Cargando…

Recipient vessels for free flaps in advanced facial oncologic defects

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively compare the results of microvascular flap reconstruction of midface and scalp advanced oncologic defects using superficial temporal versus cervical as recipient vessels. METHODS: This is a parallel group clinical trial with 1:1 allocation ratio of patients who underwent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sousa, Bruno Albuquerque, Dias, Fernando Luiz, de Sousa, Marcus A. Acioly, Pinto, Marco Antônio, Silva, Jéssica Marquet, Cernea, Cláudio Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37329667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.03.008
_version_ 1785064555258314752
author Sousa, Bruno Albuquerque
Dias, Fernando Luiz
de Sousa, Marcus A. Acioly
Pinto, Marco Antônio
Silva, Jéssica Marquet
Cernea, Cláudio Roberto
author_facet Sousa, Bruno Albuquerque
Dias, Fernando Luiz
de Sousa, Marcus A. Acioly
Pinto, Marco Antônio
Silva, Jéssica Marquet
Cernea, Cláudio Roberto
author_sort Sousa, Bruno Albuquerque
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To prospectively compare the results of microvascular flap reconstruction of midface and scalp advanced oncologic defects using superficial temporal versus cervical as recipient vessels. METHODS: This is a parallel group clinical trial with 1:1 allocation ratio of patients who underwent midface and scalp oncologic reconstruction with free tissue flap from April 2018 to April 2022 in a tertiary oncologic center. Two groups were analyzed: those in whom superficial temporal vessels were used as the recipient vessels (Group A) and those in whom cervical vessels were used as the recipient vessels (Group B). Patient gender and age, cause and localization of the defect, flap choice for reconstruction, recipient vessels, intraoperative outcome, postoperative course, and complications were recorded and analyzed. A Fisher’s exact test was used to compare outcomes between the 2 groups. RESULTS: On the basis of the different recipient vessels, 32 patients were randomized into 2 groups, and of these 27 patients completed the study: Group A with superficial temporal recipient vessels (n = 12) and Group B with cervical recipient vessels (n = 15). There were 18 male and 09 female patients with an average age of 53.92 ± 17.49 years. The overall flap survival rate was 88.89%. The overall complication rate for vascular anastomosis was 14.81%. The total flap loss rate in patients with superficial temporal recipient vessels was higher than the complication rate in those with cervical recipient vessels but with no statistical significance (16.67% vs. 6.66%, p = 0.569). Minor complications occurred in 05 patients without statistical significance between the groups (p = 0.342). CONCLUSION: In the group with superficial temporal recipient vessels, the postoperative rate of free flap complications was similar than the cervical recipient vessel group. Therefore the use of superficial temporal recipient vessels for midface and scalp oncologic reconstruction could be a reliable option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10300290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103002902023-06-29 Recipient vessels for free flaps in advanced facial oncologic defects Sousa, Bruno Albuquerque Dias, Fernando Luiz de Sousa, Marcus A. Acioly Pinto, Marco Antônio Silva, Jéssica Marquet Cernea, Cláudio Roberto Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To prospectively compare the results of microvascular flap reconstruction of midface and scalp advanced oncologic defects using superficial temporal versus cervical as recipient vessels. METHODS: This is a parallel group clinical trial with 1:1 allocation ratio of patients who underwent midface and scalp oncologic reconstruction with free tissue flap from April 2018 to April 2022 in a tertiary oncologic center. Two groups were analyzed: those in whom superficial temporal vessels were used as the recipient vessels (Group A) and those in whom cervical vessels were used as the recipient vessels (Group B). Patient gender and age, cause and localization of the defect, flap choice for reconstruction, recipient vessels, intraoperative outcome, postoperative course, and complications were recorded and analyzed. A Fisher’s exact test was used to compare outcomes between the 2 groups. RESULTS: On the basis of the different recipient vessels, 32 patients were randomized into 2 groups, and of these 27 patients completed the study: Group A with superficial temporal recipient vessels (n = 12) and Group B with cervical recipient vessels (n = 15). There were 18 male and 09 female patients with an average age of 53.92 ± 17.49 years. The overall flap survival rate was 88.89%. The overall complication rate for vascular anastomosis was 14.81%. The total flap loss rate in patients with superficial temporal recipient vessels was higher than the complication rate in those with cervical recipient vessels but with no statistical significance (16.67% vs. 6.66%, p = 0.569). Minor complications occurred in 05 patients without statistical significance between the groups (p = 0.342). CONCLUSION: In the group with superficial temporal recipient vessels, the postoperative rate of free flap complications was similar than the cervical recipient vessel group. Therefore the use of superficial temporal recipient vessels for midface and scalp oncologic reconstruction could be a reliable option. Elsevier 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10300290/ /pubmed/37329667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.03.008 Text en © 2023 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Sousa, Bruno Albuquerque
Dias, Fernando Luiz
de Sousa, Marcus A. Acioly
Pinto, Marco Antônio
Silva, Jéssica Marquet
Cernea, Cláudio Roberto
Recipient vessels for free flaps in advanced facial oncologic defects
title Recipient vessels for free flaps in advanced facial oncologic defects
title_full Recipient vessels for free flaps in advanced facial oncologic defects
title_fullStr Recipient vessels for free flaps in advanced facial oncologic defects
title_full_unstemmed Recipient vessels for free flaps in advanced facial oncologic defects
title_short Recipient vessels for free flaps in advanced facial oncologic defects
title_sort recipient vessels for free flaps in advanced facial oncologic defects
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37329667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.03.008
work_keys_str_mv AT sousabrunoalbuquerque recipientvesselsforfreeflapsinadvancedfacialoncologicdefects
AT diasfernandoluiz recipientvesselsforfreeflapsinadvancedfacialoncologicdefects
AT desousamarcusaacioly recipientvesselsforfreeflapsinadvancedfacialoncologicdefects
AT pintomarcoantonio recipientvesselsforfreeflapsinadvancedfacialoncologicdefects
AT silvajessicamarquet recipientvesselsforfreeflapsinadvancedfacialoncologicdefects
AT cerneaclaudioroberto recipientvesselsforfreeflapsinadvancedfacialoncologicdefects