Cargando…

At-Home Use of a Pregnancy-Specific Zone-MPC Closed-Loop System for Pregnancies Complicated by Type 1 Diabetes: A Single-Arm, Observational Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE: There are no commercially available hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery systems customized to achieve pregnancy-specific glucose targets in the U.S. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and performance of at-home use of a zone model predictive controller–based closed-loop insulin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levy, Carol J., Kudva, Yogish C., Ozaslan, Basak, Castorino, Kristin, O’Malley, Grenye, Kaur, Ravinder Jeet, Levister, Camilla M., Church, Mei Mei, Desjardins, Donna, McCrady-Spitzer, Shelly, Ogyaadu, Selassie, Trinidad, Mari Charisse, Reid, Corey, Rizvi, Shafaq, Deshpande, Sunil, Zaniletti, Isabella, Kremers, Walter K., Pinsker, Jordan E., Doyle, Francis J., Dassau, Eyal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37196353
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc23-0173
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: There are no commercially available hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery systems customized to achieve pregnancy-specific glucose targets in the U.S. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and performance of at-home use of a zone model predictive controller–based closed-loop insulin delivery system customized for pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes (CLC-P). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Pregnant women with type 1 diabetes using insulin pumps were enrolled in the second or early third trimester. After study sensor wear collecting run-in data on personal pump therapy and 2 days of supervised training, participants used CLC-P targeting 80–110 mg/dL during the day and 80–100 mg/dL overnight running on an unlocked smartphone at home. Meals and activities were unrestricted throughout the trial. The primary outcome was the continuous glucose monitoring percentage of time in the target range 63–140 mg/dL versus run-in. RESULTS: Ten participants (HbA(1c) 5.8 ± 0.6%) used the system from mean gestational age of 23.7 ± 3.5 weeks. Mean percentage time in range increased 14.1 percentage points, equivalent to 3.4 h per day, compared with run-in (run-in 64.5 ± 16.3% versus CLC-P 78.6 ± 9.2%; P = 0.002). During CLC-P use, there was significant decrease in both time over 140 mg/dL (P = 0.033) and the hypoglycemic ranges of less than 63 mg/dL and 54 mg/dL (P = 0.037 for both). Nine participants exceeded consensus goals of above 70% time in range during CLC-P use. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the extended use of CLC-P at home until delivery is feasible. Larger, randomized studies are needed to further evaluate system efficacy and pregnancy outcomes.