Cargando…

Rates of reoperation after breast conserving cancer surgery in Western Australia before and after publication of the SSO-ASTRO margins guideline

BACKGROUND: A 2014 SSO-ASTRO guideline on surgical margins aimed to reduce unnecessary reoperation after breast conserving surgery (BCS). We investigate whether publication of the guideline was associated with a reduction in reoperation in Western Australia (WA). METHODS: In this retrospective, popu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marinovich, M. Luke, Saunders, Christobel M., Pereira, Gavin, Houssami, Nehmat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36759253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.013
_version_ 1785064615181287424
author Marinovich, M. Luke
Saunders, Christobel M.
Pereira, Gavin
Houssami, Nehmat
author_facet Marinovich, M. Luke
Saunders, Christobel M.
Pereira, Gavin
Houssami, Nehmat
author_sort Marinovich, M. Luke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A 2014 SSO-ASTRO guideline on surgical margins aimed to reduce unnecessary reoperation after breast conserving surgery (BCS). We investigate whether publication of the guideline was associated with a reduction in reoperation in Western Australia (WA). METHODS: In this retrospective, population-based cohort study, cases of newly-diagnosed breast cancer were identified from the WA Cancer Registry. Linkage to the Hospital Morbidity Data Collection identified index BCS for invasive cancer between January 2009 and June 2018 (N = 8059) and reoperation within 90 days. Pre-guideline (2009–2013) and post-guideline (2014–2018) reoperation proportions were compared, and temporal trends were estimated with generalised linear regression. RESULTS: The pre-guideline reoperation proportion was 25.8% compared with 21.7% post-guideline (difference −4.0% [95% CI —5.9, −2.2, p < 0.001], odds ratio [OR] 0.80 [95% CI 0.72, 0.89, p < 0.001]). Absolute reductions were similar for repeat BCS (16.3% versus 14.6%; difference −1.8% [95% CI —3.4, −0.2, p = 0.03]) and conversion to mastectomy (9.4% versus 7.2%; difference −2.2% [95% CI —3.4, −1.0, p < 0.001]). Over the study period, there was an annual absolute change in reoperation of −0.8% (95% CI —1.2, −0.5, p < 0.001). Accounting for this linear trend, the difference in reoperation between time periods was −0.5% (95% CI —4.3, 3.3; p = 0.81), reflecting a non-significant reduction in conversion to mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Comparisons of pre- versus post-guideline time periods in WA showed reductions in reoperation that were similar to international estimates; however, an annual decline in reoperation predated the guideline. Analyses that do not account for temporal trends are likely to overestimate changes in reoperation associated with the guideline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10300570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103005702023-06-29 Rates of reoperation after breast conserving cancer surgery in Western Australia before and after publication of the SSO-ASTRO margins guideline Marinovich, M. Luke Saunders, Christobel M. Pereira, Gavin Houssami, Nehmat Breast Original Article BACKGROUND: A 2014 SSO-ASTRO guideline on surgical margins aimed to reduce unnecessary reoperation after breast conserving surgery (BCS). We investigate whether publication of the guideline was associated with a reduction in reoperation in Western Australia (WA). METHODS: In this retrospective, population-based cohort study, cases of newly-diagnosed breast cancer were identified from the WA Cancer Registry. Linkage to the Hospital Morbidity Data Collection identified index BCS for invasive cancer between January 2009 and June 2018 (N = 8059) and reoperation within 90 days. Pre-guideline (2009–2013) and post-guideline (2014–2018) reoperation proportions were compared, and temporal trends were estimated with generalised linear regression. RESULTS: The pre-guideline reoperation proportion was 25.8% compared with 21.7% post-guideline (difference −4.0% [95% CI —5.9, −2.2, p < 0.001], odds ratio [OR] 0.80 [95% CI 0.72, 0.89, p < 0.001]). Absolute reductions were similar for repeat BCS (16.3% versus 14.6%; difference −1.8% [95% CI —3.4, −0.2, p = 0.03]) and conversion to mastectomy (9.4% versus 7.2%; difference −2.2% [95% CI —3.4, −1.0, p < 0.001]). Over the study period, there was an annual absolute change in reoperation of −0.8% (95% CI —1.2, −0.5, p < 0.001). Accounting for this linear trend, the difference in reoperation between time periods was −0.5% (95% CI —4.3, 3.3; p = 0.81), reflecting a non-significant reduction in conversion to mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Comparisons of pre- versus post-guideline time periods in WA showed reductions in reoperation that were similar to international estimates; however, an annual decline in reoperation predated the guideline. Analyses that do not account for temporal trends are likely to overestimate changes in reoperation associated with the guideline. Elsevier 2023-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10300570/ /pubmed/36759253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.013 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Marinovich, M. Luke
Saunders, Christobel M.
Pereira, Gavin
Houssami, Nehmat
Rates of reoperation after breast conserving cancer surgery in Western Australia before and after publication of the SSO-ASTRO margins guideline
title Rates of reoperation after breast conserving cancer surgery in Western Australia before and after publication of the SSO-ASTRO margins guideline
title_full Rates of reoperation after breast conserving cancer surgery in Western Australia before and after publication of the SSO-ASTRO margins guideline
title_fullStr Rates of reoperation after breast conserving cancer surgery in Western Australia before and after publication of the SSO-ASTRO margins guideline
title_full_unstemmed Rates of reoperation after breast conserving cancer surgery in Western Australia before and after publication of the SSO-ASTRO margins guideline
title_short Rates of reoperation after breast conserving cancer surgery in Western Australia before and after publication of the SSO-ASTRO margins guideline
title_sort rates of reoperation after breast conserving cancer surgery in western australia before and after publication of the sso-astro margins guideline
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36759253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.013
work_keys_str_mv AT marinovichmluke ratesofreoperationafterbreastconservingcancersurgeryinwesternaustraliabeforeandafterpublicationofthessoastromarginsguideline
AT saunderschristobelm ratesofreoperationafterbreastconservingcancersurgeryinwesternaustraliabeforeandafterpublicationofthessoastromarginsguideline
AT pereiragavin ratesofreoperationafterbreastconservingcancersurgeryinwesternaustraliabeforeandafterpublicationofthessoastromarginsguideline
AT houssaminehmat ratesofreoperationafterbreastconservingcancersurgeryinwesternaustraliabeforeandafterpublicationofthessoastromarginsguideline