Cargando…

Modified Lemaire Tenodesis Forces in Cadaveric Specimens Are Not Affected by Random Small-Scale Variations in the Femoral Insertion Point During Active Knee Joint Flexion-Extension

PURPOSE: To directly measure lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) forces supporting anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) during dynamic flexion-extension cycles induced by simulated active muscle forces, to investigate the influence of random surgical variation in the femoral LET inse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sigloch, Maximilian, Mayr, Raul, Glodny, Bernhard, Coppola, Christian, Hoermann, Romed, Schmoelz, Werner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2023.04.007
_version_ 1785064618113105920
author Sigloch, Maximilian
Mayr, Raul
Glodny, Bernhard
Coppola, Christian
Hoermann, Romed
Schmoelz, Werner
author_facet Sigloch, Maximilian
Mayr, Raul
Glodny, Bernhard
Coppola, Christian
Hoermann, Romed
Schmoelz, Werner
author_sort Sigloch, Maximilian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To directly measure lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) forces supporting anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) during dynamic flexion-extension cycles induced by simulated active muscle forces, to investigate the influence of random surgical variation in the femoral LET insertion point around the target insertion position, and to determine potential changes to the extension behavior of the knee joint in a cadaveric model. METHODS: After iatrogenic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency and simulated anterolateral rotatory instability, 7 fresh-frozen cadaveric knee joints were treated with isolated ACLR followed by combined ACLR-LET. The specimens were tested on a knee joint test bench during active dynamic flexion-extension with simulated muscle forces. LET forces and the degree of knee joint extension were measured. Random variation in the LET insertion point around the target insertion position was postoperatively quantified by computed tomography. RESULTS: In extension, the median LET force increased to 39 ± 2 N (95% confidence interval [CI], 36 to 40 N). In flexion over 70°, the LET was offloaded (2 ± 1 N; 95% CI, 0 to 2 N). In this study, small-scale surgical variation in the femoral LET insertion point around the target position had a negligible effect on the graft forces measured. We detected no difference in the degree of knee joint extension after combined ACLR-LET (median, 1.0° ± 3.0°; 95% CI, −6.2° to 5.2°) in comparison with isolated ACLR (median, 1.1° ± 3.3°; 95% CI, −6.7° to 6.1°; P = .62). CONCLUSIONS: LET forces in combined ACLR-LET increased to a limited extent during active knee joint flexion-extension independent of small-scale variation around 1 specific target insertion point. Combined ACLR-LET did not change knee joint extension in comparison with isolated ACLR under the testing conditions used in this biomechanical study. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Low LET forces can be expected during flexion-extension of the knee joint. Small-scale deviations in the femoral LET insertion point around the target insertion position in the modified Lemaire technique might have a minor effect on graft forces during active flexion-extension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10300583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103005832023-06-29 Modified Lemaire Tenodesis Forces in Cadaveric Specimens Are Not Affected by Random Small-Scale Variations in the Femoral Insertion Point During Active Knee Joint Flexion-Extension Sigloch, Maximilian Mayr, Raul Glodny, Bernhard Coppola, Christian Hoermann, Romed Schmoelz, Werner Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: To directly measure lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) forces supporting anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) during dynamic flexion-extension cycles induced by simulated active muscle forces, to investigate the influence of random surgical variation in the femoral LET insertion point around the target insertion position, and to determine potential changes to the extension behavior of the knee joint in a cadaveric model. METHODS: After iatrogenic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency and simulated anterolateral rotatory instability, 7 fresh-frozen cadaveric knee joints were treated with isolated ACLR followed by combined ACLR-LET. The specimens were tested on a knee joint test bench during active dynamic flexion-extension with simulated muscle forces. LET forces and the degree of knee joint extension were measured. Random variation in the LET insertion point around the target insertion position was postoperatively quantified by computed tomography. RESULTS: In extension, the median LET force increased to 39 ± 2 N (95% confidence interval [CI], 36 to 40 N). In flexion over 70°, the LET was offloaded (2 ± 1 N; 95% CI, 0 to 2 N). In this study, small-scale surgical variation in the femoral LET insertion point around the target position had a negligible effect on the graft forces measured. We detected no difference in the degree of knee joint extension after combined ACLR-LET (median, 1.0° ± 3.0°; 95% CI, −6.2° to 5.2°) in comparison with isolated ACLR (median, 1.1° ± 3.3°; 95% CI, −6.7° to 6.1°; P = .62). CONCLUSIONS: LET forces in combined ACLR-LET increased to a limited extent during active knee joint flexion-extension independent of small-scale variation around 1 specific target insertion point. Combined ACLR-LET did not change knee joint extension in comparison with isolated ACLR under the testing conditions used in this biomechanical study. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Low LET forces can be expected during flexion-extension of the knee joint. Small-scale deviations in the femoral LET insertion point around the target insertion position in the modified Lemaire technique might have a minor effect on graft forces during active flexion-extension. Elsevier 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10300583/ /pubmed/37388897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2023.04.007 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Sigloch, Maximilian
Mayr, Raul
Glodny, Bernhard
Coppola, Christian
Hoermann, Romed
Schmoelz, Werner
Modified Lemaire Tenodesis Forces in Cadaveric Specimens Are Not Affected by Random Small-Scale Variations in the Femoral Insertion Point During Active Knee Joint Flexion-Extension
title Modified Lemaire Tenodesis Forces in Cadaveric Specimens Are Not Affected by Random Small-Scale Variations in the Femoral Insertion Point During Active Knee Joint Flexion-Extension
title_full Modified Lemaire Tenodesis Forces in Cadaveric Specimens Are Not Affected by Random Small-Scale Variations in the Femoral Insertion Point During Active Knee Joint Flexion-Extension
title_fullStr Modified Lemaire Tenodesis Forces in Cadaveric Specimens Are Not Affected by Random Small-Scale Variations in the Femoral Insertion Point During Active Knee Joint Flexion-Extension
title_full_unstemmed Modified Lemaire Tenodesis Forces in Cadaveric Specimens Are Not Affected by Random Small-Scale Variations in the Femoral Insertion Point During Active Knee Joint Flexion-Extension
title_short Modified Lemaire Tenodesis Forces in Cadaveric Specimens Are Not Affected by Random Small-Scale Variations in the Femoral Insertion Point During Active Knee Joint Flexion-Extension
title_sort modified lemaire tenodesis forces in cadaveric specimens are not affected by random small-scale variations in the femoral insertion point during active knee joint flexion-extension
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2023.04.007
work_keys_str_mv AT siglochmaximilian modifiedlemairetenodesisforcesincadavericspecimensarenotaffectedbyrandomsmallscalevariationsinthefemoralinsertionpointduringactivekneejointflexionextension
AT mayrraul modifiedlemairetenodesisforcesincadavericspecimensarenotaffectedbyrandomsmallscalevariationsinthefemoralinsertionpointduringactivekneejointflexionextension
AT glodnybernhard modifiedlemairetenodesisforcesincadavericspecimensarenotaffectedbyrandomsmallscalevariationsinthefemoralinsertionpointduringactivekneejointflexionextension
AT coppolachristian modifiedlemairetenodesisforcesincadavericspecimensarenotaffectedbyrandomsmallscalevariationsinthefemoralinsertionpointduringactivekneejointflexionextension
AT hoermannromed modifiedlemairetenodesisforcesincadavericspecimensarenotaffectedbyrandomsmallscalevariationsinthefemoralinsertionpointduringactivekneejointflexionextension
AT schmoelzwerner modifiedlemairetenodesisforcesincadavericspecimensarenotaffectedbyrandomsmallscalevariationsinthefemoralinsertionpointduringactivekneejointflexionextension