Cargando…

Forest Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs/Synergies and System Function Optimization in Karst Desertification Control

Karst desertification control forests are essential for ecosystem multi functionality, but the trade-offs/synergies are unclear for forest ecosystem services. In order to clarify the trade-offs/synergies, this study was conducted on eight forest communities in a karst desertification control area an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiong, Kangning, Deng, Xuehua, Zhang, Shihao, Zhang, Yu, Kong, Lingwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37376000
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12122376
_version_ 1785064652466552832
author Xiong, Kangning
Deng, Xuehua
Zhang, Shihao
Zhang, Yu
Kong, Lingwei
author_facet Xiong, Kangning
Deng, Xuehua
Zhang, Shihao
Zhang, Yu
Kong, Lingwei
author_sort Xiong, Kangning
collection PubMed
description Karst desertification control forests are essential for ecosystem multi functionality, but the trade-offs/synergies are unclear for forest ecosystem services. In order to clarify the trade-offs/synergies, this study was conducted on eight forest communities in a karst desertification control area and was based on vegetation surveys and structural and functional monitoring. It analyzes water holding capacity, species diversity, soil conservation, and carbon storage characteristics and their trade-off/synergies. The results indicate the following: (1) The Cladrastis platycarpa + Cotinus coggygria community (H1) had the highest water holding capacity and species diversity with values of 252.21 t·hm(−2) and 2.56, respectively. Soil conservation was highest in the Zanthoxylum bungeanum + Glycine max community (H6), with an index value of 1.56. Carbon storage was the greatest in the Tectona grandis community (H8), at 103.93 t·hm(−2). The results of these studies have shown that there are significant differences in different types of forest community ecosystem services. (2) Water holding capacity, species diversity, soil conservation, and carbon storage, all have synergistic relationships, suggesting a trend towards synergistic enhancement between the services. (3) The species diversity of the forest ecosystems was shown to be in a trade-off with carbon storage and soil conservation, which suggests that the services are in competition with each other. To further improve the service capacity of forest ecosystems, the trade-offs between the regulation of forest community structure and function and the improvement of services should be optimized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10300760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103007602023-06-29 Forest Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs/Synergies and System Function Optimization in Karst Desertification Control Xiong, Kangning Deng, Xuehua Zhang, Shihao Zhang, Yu Kong, Lingwei Plants (Basel) Article Karst desertification control forests are essential for ecosystem multi functionality, but the trade-offs/synergies are unclear for forest ecosystem services. In order to clarify the trade-offs/synergies, this study was conducted on eight forest communities in a karst desertification control area and was based on vegetation surveys and structural and functional monitoring. It analyzes water holding capacity, species diversity, soil conservation, and carbon storage characteristics and their trade-off/synergies. The results indicate the following: (1) The Cladrastis platycarpa + Cotinus coggygria community (H1) had the highest water holding capacity and species diversity with values of 252.21 t·hm(−2) and 2.56, respectively. Soil conservation was highest in the Zanthoxylum bungeanum + Glycine max community (H6), with an index value of 1.56. Carbon storage was the greatest in the Tectona grandis community (H8), at 103.93 t·hm(−2). The results of these studies have shown that there are significant differences in different types of forest community ecosystem services. (2) Water holding capacity, species diversity, soil conservation, and carbon storage, all have synergistic relationships, suggesting a trend towards synergistic enhancement between the services. (3) The species diversity of the forest ecosystems was shown to be in a trade-off with carbon storage and soil conservation, which suggests that the services are in competition with each other. To further improve the service capacity of forest ecosystems, the trade-offs between the regulation of forest community structure and function and the improvement of services should be optimized. MDPI 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10300760/ /pubmed/37376000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12122376 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Xiong, Kangning
Deng, Xuehua
Zhang, Shihao
Zhang, Yu
Kong, Lingwei
Forest Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs/Synergies and System Function Optimization in Karst Desertification Control
title Forest Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs/Synergies and System Function Optimization in Karst Desertification Control
title_full Forest Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs/Synergies and System Function Optimization in Karst Desertification Control
title_fullStr Forest Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs/Synergies and System Function Optimization in Karst Desertification Control
title_full_unstemmed Forest Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs/Synergies and System Function Optimization in Karst Desertification Control
title_short Forest Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs/Synergies and System Function Optimization in Karst Desertification Control
title_sort forest ecosystem service trade-offs/synergies and system function optimization in karst desertification control
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37376000
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12122376
work_keys_str_mv AT xiongkangning forestecosystemservicetradeoffssynergiesandsystemfunctionoptimizationinkarstdesertificationcontrol
AT dengxuehua forestecosystemservicetradeoffssynergiesandsystemfunctionoptimizationinkarstdesertificationcontrol
AT zhangshihao forestecosystemservicetradeoffssynergiesandsystemfunctionoptimizationinkarstdesertificationcontrol
AT zhangyu forestecosystemservicetradeoffssynergiesandsystemfunctionoptimizationinkarstdesertificationcontrol
AT konglingwei forestecosystemservicetradeoffssynergiesandsystemfunctionoptimizationinkarstdesertificationcontrol