Cargando…

Development of a Novel Retrospective Instrument to Gauge the General Well-Being Index and Lumbar-Specific Disability Index Post-intervention in Lumbar Degenerative Disease

STUDY DESIGN: Validation of a novel retrospective comparative questionnaire to obtain post-intervention outcome data in patients with lumbar degenerative spinal disease. PURPOSE: Acquiring prospective outcome data for spinal intervention is not frequently feasible in resource-depleted units in certa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chong, Song Ying, Danaee, Mahmoud, Ganesan, Dharmendra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36740928
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2022.0293
_version_ 1785064680758181888
author Chong, Song Ying
Danaee, Mahmoud
Ganesan, Dharmendra
author_facet Chong, Song Ying
Danaee, Mahmoud
Ganesan, Dharmendra
author_sort Chong, Song Ying
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Validation of a novel retrospective comparative questionnaire to obtain post-intervention outcome data in patients with lumbar degenerative spinal disease. PURPOSE: Acquiring prospective outcome data for spinal intervention is not frequently feasible in resource-depleted units in certain developing countries. Therefore, a novel retrospective instrument is being validated for clinical use, which can act as a standard method to describe outcomes when data are retrospectively collected. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The standard method of collecting outcome data after a spinal intervention has been prospective, including the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Questionnaire, and Short Form-36. The process of content validation and reliability of the novel retrospective spinal questionnaires is highlighted. METHODS: Questionnaire items were created based on a literature review, followed by a process of content validation by experts and modification based on expert opinions to achieve an acceptable content validity index (CVI, 0.70–1.00). To calculate factor loadings for each question, a pilot test was subsequently conducted from a pool of patients who underwent lumbar spine surgeries for degenerative spine diseases. RESULTS: All items achieved a CVI of >0.85 for both relevancy and clarity and were successfully validated after appropriate corrections were made before the second validation phase. Except for Q9 and Q10, which showed low-loading factors in the pooled sample, the remainder of the items had acceptable loading factors across different subgroups, indicating that the passage of time did not affect the results of the exploratory factor analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The retrospective questionnaire that encompasses the general well-being and lumbar-specific symptoms is a valid and reliable instrument to provide an impression of the outcome after intervention in a patient with a degenerative lumbar spinal disease. A summative score will indicate the overall outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10300880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103008802023-06-29 Development of a Novel Retrospective Instrument to Gauge the General Well-Being Index and Lumbar-Specific Disability Index Post-intervention in Lumbar Degenerative Disease Chong, Song Ying Danaee, Mahmoud Ganesan, Dharmendra Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Validation of a novel retrospective comparative questionnaire to obtain post-intervention outcome data in patients with lumbar degenerative spinal disease. PURPOSE: Acquiring prospective outcome data for spinal intervention is not frequently feasible in resource-depleted units in certain developing countries. Therefore, a novel retrospective instrument is being validated for clinical use, which can act as a standard method to describe outcomes when data are retrospectively collected. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The standard method of collecting outcome data after a spinal intervention has been prospective, including the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Questionnaire, and Short Form-36. The process of content validation and reliability of the novel retrospective spinal questionnaires is highlighted. METHODS: Questionnaire items were created based on a literature review, followed by a process of content validation by experts and modification based on expert opinions to achieve an acceptable content validity index (CVI, 0.70–1.00). To calculate factor loadings for each question, a pilot test was subsequently conducted from a pool of patients who underwent lumbar spine surgeries for degenerative spine diseases. RESULTS: All items achieved a CVI of >0.85 for both relevancy and clarity and were successfully validated after appropriate corrections were made before the second validation phase. Except for Q9 and Q10, which showed low-loading factors in the pooled sample, the remainder of the items had acceptable loading factors across different subgroups, indicating that the passage of time did not affect the results of the exploratory factor analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The retrospective questionnaire that encompasses the general well-being and lumbar-specific symptoms is a valid and reliable instrument to provide an impression of the outcome after intervention in a patient with a degenerative lumbar spinal disease. A summative score will indicate the overall outcome. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2023-06 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10300880/ /pubmed/36740928 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2022.0293 Text en Copyright © 2023 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Chong, Song Ying
Danaee, Mahmoud
Ganesan, Dharmendra
Development of a Novel Retrospective Instrument to Gauge the General Well-Being Index and Lumbar-Specific Disability Index Post-intervention in Lumbar Degenerative Disease
title Development of a Novel Retrospective Instrument to Gauge the General Well-Being Index and Lumbar-Specific Disability Index Post-intervention in Lumbar Degenerative Disease
title_full Development of a Novel Retrospective Instrument to Gauge the General Well-Being Index and Lumbar-Specific Disability Index Post-intervention in Lumbar Degenerative Disease
title_fullStr Development of a Novel Retrospective Instrument to Gauge the General Well-Being Index and Lumbar-Specific Disability Index Post-intervention in Lumbar Degenerative Disease
title_full_unstemmed Development of a Novel Retrospective Instrument to Gauge the General Well-Being Index and Lumbar-Specific Disability Index Post-intervention in Lumbar Degenerative Disease
title_short Development of a Novel Retrospective Instrument to Gauge the General Well-Being Index and Lumbar-Specific Disability Index Post-intervention in Lumbar Degenerative Disease
title_sort development of a novel retrospective instrument to gauge the general well-being index and lumbar-specific disability index post-intervention in lumbar degenerative disease
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36740928
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2022.0293
work_keys_str_mv AT chongsongying developmentofanovelretrospectiveinstrumenttogaugethegeneralwellbeingindexandlumbarspecificdisabilityindexpostinterventioninlumbardegenerativedisease
AT danaeemahmoud developmentofanovelretrospectiveinstrumenttogaugethegeneralwellbeingindexandlumbarspecificdisabilityindexpostinterventioninlumbardegenerativedisease
AT ganesandharmendra developmentofanovelretrospectiveinstrumenttogaugethegeneralwellbeingindexandlumbarspecificdisabilityindexpostinterventioninlumbardegenerativedisease