Cargando…

Effect of Antibacterial Agents on Dentin Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Materials

Treating dentin surfaces with antibacterial agents prior to bonding bioactive restorations might affect their mechanical properties. In this study, we evaluated the effect of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) and chlorhexidine (CHX) on the shear bond strength (SBS) of bioactive restorative materials. De...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abuljadayel, Roaa, Aljadani, Nouf, Almutairi, Hazim, Turkistani, Alaa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37376257
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15122612
_version_ 1785064698427736064
author Abuljadayel, Roaa
Aljadani, Nouf
Almutairi, Hazim
Turkistani, Alaa
author_facet Abuljadayel, Roaa
Aljadani, Nouf
Almutairi, Hazim
Turkistani, Alaa
author_sort Abuljadayel, Roaa
collection PubMed
description Treating dentin surfaces with antibacterial agents prior to bonding bioactive restorations might affect their mechanical properties. In this study, we evaluated the effect of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) and chlorhexidine (CHX) on the shear bond strength (SBS) of bioactive restorative materials. Dentin discs were treated with SDF for 60 s or CHX for 20 s and bonded with four restorative materials, namely Activa Bioactive Restorative (AB), Beautifil II (BF), Fuji II LC (FJ), and Surefil One (SO). Control discs were bonded without treatment (n = 10). SBS was determined using a universal testing machine, and a scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used for the evaluation of the failure mode and the cross-sectional examination of adhesive interfaces. The SBS of each material between different treatments and of the different materials within each treatment were compared via a Kruskal–Wallis test. The SBS of AB and BF was significantly higher than that of FJ and SO in the control and CHX groups (p < 0.01). In the latter, SBS was higher in FJ than SO (p < 0.01). SO had a higher value with SDF compared to CHX (p = 0.01). The SBS of SDF-treated FJ was higher than that of the control (p < 0.01). SEM showed a more homogenous and improved interface of FJ and SO with SDF. Neither CHX nor SDF compromised the dentin bonding of bioactive restorative materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10300955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103009552023-06-29 Effect of Antibacterial Agents on Dentin Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Materials Abuljadayel, Roaa Aljadani, Nouf Almutairi, Hazim Turkistani, Alaa Polymers (Basel) Article Treating dentin surfaces with antibacterial agents prior to bonding bioactive restorations might affect their mechanical properties. In this study, we evaluated the effect of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) and chlorhexidine (CHX) on the shear bond strength (SBS) of bioactive restorative materials. Dentin discs were treated with SDF for 60 s or CHX for 20 s and bonded with four restorative materials, namely Activa Bioactive Restorative (AB), Beautifil II (BF), Fuji II LC (FJ), and Surefil One (SO). Control discs were bonded without treatment (n = 10). SBS was determined using a universal testing machine, and a scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used for the evaluation of the failure mode and the cross-sectional examination of adhesive interfaces. The SBS of each material between different treatments and of the different materials within each treatment were compared via a Kruskal–Wallis test. The SBS of AB and BF was significantly higher than that of FJ and SO in the control and CHX groups (p < 0.01). In the latter, SBS was higher in FJ than SO (p < 0.01). SO had a higher value with SDF compared to CHX (p = 0.01). The SBS of SDF-treated FJ was higher than that of the control (p < 0.01). SEM showed a more homogenous and improved interface of FJ and SO with SDF. Neither CHX nor SDF compromised the dentin bonding of bioactive restorative materials. MDPI 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10300955/ /pubmed/37376257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15122612 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Abuljadayel, Roaa
Aljadani, Nouf
Almutairi, Hazim
Turkistani, Alaa
Effect of Antibacterial Agents on Dentin Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Materials
title Effect of Antibacterial Agents on Dentin Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Materials
title_full Effect of Antibacterial Agents on Dentin Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Materials
title_fullStr Effect of Antibacterial Agents on Dentin Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Materials
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Antibacterial Agents on Dentin Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Materials
title_short Effect of Antibacterial Agents on Dentin Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Materials
title_sort effect of antibacterial agents on dentin bond strength of bioactive restorative materials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37376257
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15122612
work_keys_str_mv AT abuljadayelroaa effectofantibacterialagentsondentinbondstrengthofbioactiverestorativematerials
AT aljadaninouf effectofantibacterialagentsondentinbondstrengthofbioactiverestorativematerials
AT almutairihazim effectofantibacterialagentsondentinbondstrengthofbioactiverestorativematerials
AT turkistanialaa effectofantibacterialagentsondentinbondstrengthofbioactiverestorativematerials