Cargando…

A Comparison of the Effect of Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNCs) and Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) as Additives in Ultrafiltration Membranes (PES-UF): Characterization and Performance

This work demonstrated the potential of CNC as a substitute for PEG as an additive in ultrafiltration membrane fabrication. Two sets of modified membranes were fabricated using the phase inversion technique, with polyethersulfone (PES) as the base polymer and 1-N-methyl-2 pyrrolidone (NMP) as the so...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adeniyi, Amos, Odo, Gerald Oke, Gonzalez-Ortiz, Danae, Pochat-Bohatier, Celine, Mbakop, Sandrine, Onyango, Maurice Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37376282
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15122636
_version_ 1785064711060979712
author Adeniyi, Amos
Odo, Gerald Oke
Gonzalez-Ortiz, Danae
Pochat-Bohatier, Celine
Mbakop, Sandrine
Onyango, Maurice Stephen
author_facet Adeniyi, Amos
Odo, Gerald Oke
Gonzalez-Ortiz, Danae
Pochat-Bohatier, Celine
Mbakop, Sandrine
Onyango, Maurice Stephen
author_sort Adeniyi, Amos
collection PubMed
description This work demonstrated the potential of CNC as a substitute for PEG as an additive in ultrafiltration membrane fabrication. Two sets of modified membranes were fabricated using the phase inversion technique, with polyethersulfone (PES) as the base polymer and 1-N-methyl-2 pyrrolidone (NMP) as the solvent. The first set was fabricated with 0.075 wt% CNC, while the second set was fabricated with 2 wt% PEG. All membranes were characterized using SEM, EDX, FTIR, and contact angle measurements. The SEM images were analyzed for surface characteristics using WSxM 5.0 Develop 9.1 software. The membranes were tested, characterized, and compared for their performance in treating both synthetic and real restaurant wastewater. Both membranes exhibited improved hydrophilicity, morphology, pore structure, and roughness. Both membranes also exhibited similar water flux for real and synthetic polluted water. However, the membrane prepared with CNC gave higher turbidity removal and COD removal when raw restaurant water was treated. The membrane compared well with the UF membrane containing 2 wt% PEG in terms of morphology and performance when synthetic turbid water and raw restaurant water were treated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10301009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103010092023-06-29 A Comparison of the Effect of Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNCs) and Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) as Additives in Ultrafiltration Membranes (PES-UF): Characterization and Performance Adeniyi, Amos Odo, Gerald Oke Gonzalez-Ortiz, Danae Pochat-Bohatier, Celine Mbakop, Sandrine Onyango, Maurice Stephen Polymers (Basel) Article This work demonstrated the potential of CNC as a substitute for PEG as an additive in ultrafiltration membrane fabrication. Two sets of modified membranes were fabricated using the phase inversion technique, with polyethersulfone (PES) as the base polymer and 1-N-methyl-2 pyrrolidone (NMP) as the solvent. The first set was fabricated with 0.075 wt% CNC, while the second set was fabricated with 2 wt% PEG. All membranes were characterized using SEM, EDX, FTIR, and contact angle measurements. The SEM images were analyzed for surface characteristics using WSxM 5.0 Develop 9.1 software. The membranes were tested, characterized, and compared for their performance in treating both synthetic and real restaurant wastewater. Both membranes exhibited improved hydrophilicity, morphology, pore structure, and roughness. Both membranes also exhibited similar water flux for real and synthetic polluted water. However, the membrane prepared with CNC gave higher turbidity removal and COD removal when raw restaurant water was treated. The membrane compared well with the UF membrane containing 2 wt% PEG in terms of morphology and performance when synthetic turbid water and raw restaurant water were treated. MDPI 2023-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10301009/ /pubmed/37376282 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15122636 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Adeniyi, Amos
Odo, Gerald Oke
Gonzalez-Ortiz, Danae
Pochat-Bohatier, Celine
Mbakop, Sandrine
Onyango, Maurice Stephen
A Comparison of the Effect of Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNCs) and Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) as Additives in Ultrafiltration Membranes (PES-UF): Characterization and Performance
title A Comparison of the Effect of Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNCs) and Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) as Additives in Ultrafiltration Membranes (PES-UF): Characterization and Performance
title_full A Comparison of the Effect of Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNCs) and Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) as Additives in Ultrafiltration Membranes (PES-UF): Characterization and Performance
title_fullStr A Comparison of the Effect of Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNCs) and Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) as Additives in Ultrafiltration Membranes (PES-UF): Characterization and Performance
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of the Effect of Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNCs) and Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) as Additives in Ultrafiltration Membranes (PES-UF): Characterization and Performance
title_short A Comparison of the Effect of Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNCs) and Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) as Additives in Ultrafiltration Membranes (PES-UF): Characterization and Performance
title_sort comparison of the effect of cellulose nanocrystals (cncs) and polyethylene glycol (peg) as additives in ultrafiltration membranes (pes-uf): characterization and performance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37376282
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15122636
work_keys_str_mv AT adeniyiamos acomparisonoftheeffectofcellulosenanocrystalscncsandpolyethyleneglycolpegasadditivesinultrafiltrationmembranespesufcharacterizationandperformance
AT odogeraldoke acomparisonoftheeffectofcellulosenanocrystalscncsandpolyethyleneglycolpegasadditivesinultrafiltrationmembranespesufcharacterizationandperformance
AT gonzalezortizdanae acomparisonoftheeffectofcellulosenanocrystalscncsandpolyethyleneglycolpegasadditivesinultrafiltrationmembranespesufcharacterizationandperformance
AT pochatbohatierceline acomparisonoftheeffectofcellulosenanocrystalscncsandpolyethyleneglycolpegasadditivesinultrafiltrationmembranespesufcharacterizationandperformance
AT mbakopsandrine acomparisonoftheeffectofcellulosenanocrystalscncsandpolyethyleneglycolpegasadditivesinultrafiltrationmembranespesufcharacterizationandperformance
AT onyangomauricestephen acomparisonoftheeffectofcellulosenanocrystalscncsandpolyethyleneglycolpegasadditivesinultrafiltrationmembranespesufcharacterizationandperformance
AT adeniyiamos comparisonoftheeffectofcellulosenanocrystalscncsandpolyethyleneglycolpegasadditivesinultrafiltrationmembranespesufcharacterizationandperformance
AT odogeraldoke comparisonoftheeffectofcellulosenanocrystalscncsandpolyethyleneglycolpegasadditivesinultrafiltrationmembranespesufcharacterizationandperformance
AT gonzalezortizdanae comparisonoftheeffectofcellulosenanocrystalscncsandpolyethyleneglycolpegasadditivesinultrafiltrationmembranespesufcharacterizationandperformance
AT pochatbohatierceline comparisonoftheeffectofcellulosenanocrystalscncsandpolyethyleneglycolpegasadditivesinultrafiltrationmembranespesufcharacterizationandperformance
AT mbakopsandrine comparisonoftheeffectofcellulosenanocrystalscncsandpolyethyleneglycolpegasadditivesinultrafiltrationmembranespesufcharacterizationandperformance
AT onyangomauricestephen comparisonoftheeffectofcellulosenanocrystalscncsandpolyethyleneglycolpegasadditivesinultrafiltrationmembranespesufcharacterizationandperformance