Cargando…

Flexural Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium-Based Silicate Glass–Ceramics: A Narrative Review

Amongst chairside CAD/CAM materials, the use of lithium-based silicate glass–ceramics (LSGC) for indirect restorations has recently been increasing. Flexural strength is one of the most important parameters to consider in the clinical selection of materials. The aim of this paper is to review the fl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munoz, Alvaro, Zhao, Zejiao, Paolone, Gaetano, Louca, Chris, Vichi, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37374581
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16124398
_version_ 1785064735198150656
author Munoz, Alvaro
Zhao, Zejiao
Paolone, Gaetano
Louca, Chris
Vichi, Alessandro
author_facet Munoz, Alvaro
Zhao, Zejiao
Paolone, Gaetano
Louca, Chris
Vichi, Alessandro
author_sort Munoz, Alvaro
collection PubMed
description Amongst chairside CAD/CAM materials, the use of lithium-based silicate glass–ceramics (LSGC) for indirect restorations has recently been increasing. Flexural strength is one of the most important parameters to consider in the clinical selection of materials. The aim of this paper is to review the flexural strength of LSGC and the methods used to measure it. Methods: The electronic search was completed within PubMed database from 2 June 2011 to 2 June 2022. English-language papers investigating the flexural strength of IPS e.max CAD, Celtra Duo, Suprinity PC, and n!ce CAD/CAM blocks were included in the search strategy. Results: From 211 potential articles, a total of 26 were identified for a comprehensive analysis. Categorization per material was carried out as follows: IPS e.max CAD (n = 27), Suprinity PC (n = 8), Celtra Duo (n = 6), and n!ce (n = 1). The three-point bending test (3-PBT) was used in 18 articles, followed by biaxial flexural test (BFT) in 10 articles, with one of these using the four-point bending test (4-PBT) as well. The most common specimen dimension was 14 × 4 × 1.2 mm (plates) for the 3-PBT and 12 × 1.2 mm (discs) for BFT. The flexural strength values for LSGC materials varied widely between the studies. Significance: As new LSGC materials are launched on the market, clinicians need to be aware of their flexural strength differences, which could influence the clinical performance of restorations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10301111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103011112023-06-29 Flexural Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium-Based Silicate Glass–Ceramics: A Narrative Review Munoz, Alvaro Zhao, Zejiao Paolone, Gaetano Louca, Chris Vichi, Alessandro Materials (Basel) Review Amongst chairside CAD/CAM materials, the use of lithium-based silicate glass–ceramics (LSGC) for indirect restorations has recently been increasing. Flexural strength is one of the most important parameters to consider in the clinical selection of materials. The aim of this paper is to review the flexural strength of LSGC and the methods used to measure it. Methods: The electronic search was completed within PubMed database from 2 June 2011 to 2 June 2022. English-language papers investigating the flexural strength of IPS e.max CAD, Celtra Duo, Suprinity PC, and n!ce CAD/CAM blocks were included in the search strategy. Results: From 211 potential articles, a total of 26 were identified for a comprehensive analysis. Categorization per material was carried out as follows: IPS e.max CAD (n = 27), Suprinity PC (n = 8), Celtra Duo (n = 6), and n!ce (n = 1). The three-point bending test (3-PBT) was used in 18 articles, followed by biaxial flexural test (BFT) in 10 articles, with one of these using the four-point bending test (4-PBT) as well. The most common specimen dimension was 14 × 4 × 1.2 mm (plates) for the 3-PBT and 12 × 1.2 mm (discs) for BFT. The flexural strength values for LSGC materials varied widely between the studies. Significance: As new LSGC materials are launched on the market, clinicians need to be aware of their flexural strength differences, which could influence the clinical performance of restorations. MDPI 2023-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10301111/ /pubmed/37374581 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16124398 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Munoz, Alvaro
Zhao, Zejiao
Paolone, Gaetano
Louca, Chris
Vichi, Alessandro
Flexural Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium-Based Silicate Glass–Ceramics: A Narrative Review
title Flexural Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium-Based Silicate Glass–Ceramics: A Narrative Review
title_full Flexural Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium-Based Silicate Glass–Ceramics: A Narrative Review
title_fullStr Flexural Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium-Based Silicate Glass–Ceramics: A Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed Flexural Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium-Based Silicate Glass–Ceramics: A Narrative Review
title_short Flexural Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium-Based Silicate Glass–Ceramics: A Narrative Review
title_sort flexural strength of cad/cam lithium-based silicate glass–ceramics: a narrative review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37374581
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16124398
work_keys_str_mv AT munozalvaro flexuralstrengthofcadcamlithiumbasedsilicateglassceramicsanarrativereview
AT zhaozejiao flexuralstrengthofcadcamlithiumbasedsilicateglassceramicsanarrativereview
AT paolonegaetano flexuralstrengthofcadcamlithiumbasedsilicateglassceramicsanarrativereview
AT loucachris flexuralstrengthofcadcamlithiumbasedsilicateglassceramicsanarrativereview
AT vichialessandro flexuralstrengthofcadcamlithiumbasedsilicateglassceramicsanarrativereview