Cargando…
Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review
This article provides a thorough overview of the available resorbable biomaterials appropriate for producing replacements for damaged tissues. In addition, their various properties and application possibilities are discussed as well. Biomaterials are fundamental components in tissue engineering (TE)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37374451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16124267 |
_version_ | 1785064765421256704 |
---|---|
author | Vach Agocsova, Sara Culenova, Martina Birova, Ivana Omanikova, Leona Moncmanova, Barbora Danisovic, Lubos Ziaran, Stanislav Bakos, Dusan Alexy, Pavol |
author_facet | Vach Agocsova, Sara Culenova, Martina Birova, Ivana Omanikova, Leona Moncmanova, Barbora Danisovic, Lubos Ziaran, Stanislav Bakos, Dusan Alexy, Pavol |
author_sort | Vach Agocsova, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article provides a thorough overview of the available resorbable biomaterials appropriate for producing replacements for damaged tissues. In addition, their various properties and application possibilities are discussed as well. Biomaterials are fundamental components in tissue engineering (TE) of scaffolds and play a critical role. They need to exhibit biocompatibility, bioactivity, biodegradability, and non-toxicity, to ensure their ability to function effectively with an appropriate host response. With ongoing research and advancements in biomaterials for medical implants, the objective of this review is to explore recently developed implantable scaffold materials for various tissues. The categorization of biomaterials in this paper includes fossil-based materials (e.g., PCL, PVA, PU, PEG, and PPF), natural or bio-based materials (e.g., HA, PLA, PHB, PHBV, chitosan, fibrin, collagen, starch, and hydrogels), and hybrid biomaterials (e.g., PCL/PLA, PCL/PEG, PLA/PEG, PLA/PHB PCL/collagen, PCL/chitosan, PCL/starch, and PLA/bioceramics). The application of these biomaterials in both hard and soft TE is considered, with a particular focus on their physicochemical, mechanical, and biological properties. Furthermore, the interactions between scaffolds and the host immune system in the context of scaffold-driven tissue regeneration are discussed. Additionally, the article briefly mentions the concept of in situ TE, which leverages the self-renewal capacities of affected tissues and highlights the crucial role played by biopolymer-based scaffolds in this strategy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10301242 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103012422023-06-29 Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review Vach Agocsova, Sara Culenova, Martina Birova, Ivana Omanikova, Leona Moncmanova, Barbora Danisovic, Lubos Ziaran, Stanislav Bakos, Dusan Alexy, Pavol Materials (Basel) Review This article provides a thorough overview of the available resorbable biomaterials appropriate for producing replacements for damaged tissues. In addition, their various properties and application possibilities are discussed as well. Biomaterials are fundamental components in tissue engineering (TE) of scaffolds and play a critical role. They need to exhibit biocompatibility, bioactivity, biodegradability, and non-toxicity, to ensure their ability to function effectively with an appropriate host response. With ongoing research and advancements in biomaterials for medical implants, the objective of this review is to explore recently developed implantable scaffold materials for various tissues. The categorization of biomaterials in this paper includes fossil-based materials (e.g., PCL, PVA, PU, PEG, and PPF), natural or bio-based materials (e.g., HA, PLA, PHB, PHBV, chitosan, fibrin, collagen, starch, and hydrogels), and hybrid biomaterials (e.g., PCL/PLA, PCL/PEG, PLA/PEG, PLA/PHB PCL/collagen, PCL/chitosan, PCL/starch, and PLA/bioceramics). The application of these biomaterials in both hard and soft TE is considered, with a particular focus on their physicochemical, mechanical, and biological properties. Furthermore, the interactions between scaffolds and the host immune system in the context of scaffold-driven tissue regeneration are discussed. Additionally, the article briefly mentions the concept of in situ TE, which leverages the self-renewal capacities of affected tissues and highlights the crucial role played by biopolymer-based scaffolds in this strategy. MDPI 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10301242/ /pubmed/37374451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16124267 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Vach Agocsova, Sara Culenova, Martina Birova, Ivana Omanikova, Leona Moncmanova, Barbora Danisovic, Lubos Ziaran, Stanislav Bakos, Dusan Alexy, Pavol Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review |
title | Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review |
title_full | Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review |
title_fullStr | Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review |
title_short | Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review |
title_sort | resorbable biomaterials used for 3d scaffolds in tissue engineering: a review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37374451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16124267 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vachagocsovasara resorbablebiomaterialsusedfor3dscaffoldsintissueengineeringareview AT culenovamartina resorbablebiomaterialsusedfor3dscaffoldsintissueengineeringareview AT birovaivana resorbablebiomaterialsusedfor3dscaffoldsintissueengineeringareview AT omanikovaleona resorbablebiomaterialsusedfor3dscaffoldsintissueengineeringareview AT moncmanovabarbora resorbablebiomaterialsusedfor3dscaffoldsintissueengineeringareview AT danisoviclubos resorbablebiomaterialsusedfor3dscaffoldsintissueengineeringareview AT ziaranstanislav resorbablebiomaterialsusedfor3dscaffoldsintissueengineeringareview AT bakosdusan resorbablebiomaterialsusedfor3dscaffoldsintissueengineeringareview AT alexypavol resorbablebiomaterialsusedfor3dscaffoldsintissueengineeringareview |