Cargando…

Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Incidental Aortic Arch Abnormalities on Contrast-Enhanced Neck MR Angiography: A Single-Center Experience

Background and Objectives: Vascular abnormalities within the anatomical coverage are frequently encountered in imaging studies. The aortic arch is often overlooked as an anatomical blind spot, especially in neck magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. This study investigated the prevalence of incidenta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hwang, Minhee, Choi, Dae-Seob, Choi, Kwang-Ho, Baek, Hye-Jin, Cho, Eun, Park, Jong-Myung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37374376
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061172
_version_ 1785064777368731648
author Hwang, Minhee
Choi, Dae-Seob
Choi, Kwang-Ho
Baek, Hye-Jin
Cho, Eun
Park, Jong-Myung
author_facet Hwang, Minhee
Choi, Dae-Seob
Choi, Kwang-Ho
Baek, Hye-Jin
Cho, Eun
Park, Jong-Myung
author_sort Hwang, Minhee
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Vascular abnormalities within the anatomical coverage are frequently encountered in imaging studies. The aortic arch is often overlooked as an anatomical blind spot, especially in neck magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. This study investigated the prevalence of incidental aortic arch abnormalities. We also estimated the potential clinical significance of aortic arch abnormalities as blind spots detected on contrast-enhanced neck MR angiography. Materials and Methods: Between February 2016 and March 2023, 348 patients were identified based on contrast-enhanced neck MR angiography reports. The clinical and radiological characteristics of the patients and the presence of additional imaging studies were assessed. The aortic arch abnormalities and coexisting non-aortic arterial abnormalities were classified into two categories according to their clinical significance. We performed the χ(2) test and Fisher’s exact test for group comparisons. Results: Of the 348 study patients, only 29 (8.3%) had clinically significant incidental aortic arch abnormalities. Among these 348 patients, 250 (71.8%) and 136 (39%) had intracranial and extracranial abnormalities, respectively; the clinically significant intracranial abnormalities in the two groups were 130 lesions (52.0%) and 38 lesions (27.9%), respectively. In addition, there was a significantly higher tendency of clinically significant aortic arch abnormalities (13/29, 44.8%) in the patients who had clinically significant coexisting non-aortic arterial abnormalities than in the other group (87/319, 27.3%) (p = 0.044). The patient groups with clinically significant intracranial or extracranial arterial abnormalities had higher rates of clinically significant aortic abnormalities (31.0% and 17.2%), but there was no statistical significance (p = 0.136). Conclusions: The incidence of clinically significant aortic arch abnormalities was 8.3% on neck MR angiography, with a significant association between aortic and coexisting non-aortic arterial abnormalities. The findings of this study could improve the understanding of incidental aortic arch lesions on neck MR angiography, which is of crucial clinical importance for radiologists to achieve accurate diagnoses and management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10301293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103012932023-06-29 Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Incidental Aortic Arch Abnormalities on Contrast-Enhanced Neck MR Angiography: A Single-Center Experience Hwang, Minhee Choi, Dae-Seob Choi, Kwang-Ho Baek, Hye-Jin Cho, Eun Park, Jong-Myung Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Vascular abnormalities within the anatomical coverage are frequently encountered in imaging studies. The aortic arch is often overlooked as an anatomical blind spot, especially in neck magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. This study investigated the prevalence of incidental aortic arch abnormalities. We also estimated the potential clinical significance of aortic arch abnormalities as blind spots detected on contrast-enhanced neck MR angiography. Materials and Methods: Between February 2016 and March 2023, 348 patients were identified based on contrast-enhanced neck MR angiography reports. The clinical and radiological characteristics of the patients and the presence of additional imaging studies were assessed. The aortic arch abnormalities and coexisting non-aortic arterial abnormalities were classified into two categories according to their clinical significance. We performed the χ(2) test and Fisher’s exact test for group comparisons. Results: Of the 348 study patients, only 29 (8.3%) had clinically significant incidental aortic arch abnormalities. Among these 348 patients, 250 (71.8%) and 136 (39%) had intracranial and extracranial abnormalities, respectively; the clinically significant intracranial abnormalities in the two groups were 130 lesions (52.0%) and 38 lesions (27.9%), respectively. In addition, there was a significantly higher tendency of clinically significant aortic arch abnormalities (13/29, 44.8%) in the patients who had clinically significant coexisting non-aortic arterial abnormalities than in the other group (87/319, 27.3%) (p = 0.044). The patient groups with clinically significant intracranial or extracranial arterial abnormalities had higher rates of clinically significant aortic abnormalities (31.0% and 17.2%), but there was no statistical significance (p = 0.136). Conclusions: The incidence of clinically significant aortic arch abnormalities was 8.3% on neck MR angiography, with a significant association between aortic and coexisting non-aortic arterial abnormalities. The findings of this study could improve the understanding of incidental aortic arch lesions on neck MR angiography, which is of crucial clinical importance for radiologists to achieve accurate diagnoses and management. MDPI 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10301293/ /pubmed/37374376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061172 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hwang, Minhee
Choi, Dae-Seob
Choi, Kwang-Ho
Baek, Hye-Jin
Cho, Eun
Park, Jong-Myung
Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Incidental Aortic Arch Abnormalities on Contrast-Enhanced Neck MR Angiography: A Single-Center Experience
title Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Incidental Aortic Arch Abnormalities on Contrast-Enhanced Neck MR Angiography: A Single-Center Experience
title_full Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Incidental Aortic Arch Abnormalities on Contrast-Enhanced Neck MR Angiography: A Single-Center Experience
title_fullStr Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Incidental Aortic Arch Abnormalities on Contrast-Enhanced Neck MR Angiography: A Single-Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Incidental Aortic Arch Abnormalities on Contrast-Enhanced Neck MR Angiography: A Single-Center Experience
title_short Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Incidental Aortic Arch Abnormalities on Contrast-Enhanced Neck MR Angiography: A Single-Center Experience
title_sort prevalence and clinical implications of incidental aortic arch abnormalities on contrast-enhanced neck mr angiography: a single-center experience
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37374376
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061172
work_keys_str_mv AT hwangminhee prevalenceandclinicalimplicationsofincidentalaorticarchabnormalitiesoncontrastenhancedneckmrangiographyasinglecenterexperience
AT choidaeseob prevalenceandclinicalimplicationsofincidentalaorticarchabnormalitiesoncontrastenhancedneckmrangiographyasinglecenterexperience
AT choikwangho prevalenceandclinicalimplicationsofincidentalaorticarchabnormalitiesoncontrastenhancedneckmrangiographyasinglecenterexperience
AT baekhyejin prevalenceandclinicalimplicationsofincidentalaorticarchabnormalitiesoncontrastenhancedneckmrangiographyasinglecenterexperience
AT choeun prevalenceandclinicalimplicationsofincidentalaorticarchabnormalitiesoncontrastenhancedneckmrangiographyasinglecenterexperience
AT parkjongmyung prevalenceandclinicalimplicationsofincidentalaorticarchabnormalitiesoncontrastenhancedneckmrangiographyasinglecenterexperience