Cargando…

The Role of Cosolvent–Water Interactions in Effects of the Media on Functionality of Enzymes: A Case Study of Photobacterium leiognathi Luciferase

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Traditionally, enzymes have been studied in standardized buffers, but in real life, inside cells, they have to function under conditions far from “ideal”. The intracellular milieu is crowded by numerous molecules with various physical and chemical properties. What consequences does i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lisitsa, Albert E., Sukovatyi, Lev A., Deeva, Anna A., Gulnov, Dmitry V., Esimbekova, Elena N., Kratasyuk, Valentina A., Nemtseva, Elena V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37374166
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13061384
_version_ 1785064785572790272
author Lisitsa, Albert E.
Sukovatyi, Lev A.
Deeva, Anna A.
Gulnov, Dmitry V.
Esimbekova, Elena N.
Kratasyuk, Valentina A.
Nemtseva, Elena V.
author_facet Lisitsa, Albert E.
Sukovatyi, Lev A.
Deeva, Anna A.
Gulnov, Dmitry V.
Esimbekova, Elena N.
Kratasyuk, Valentina A.
Nemtseva, Elena V.
author_sort Lisitsa, Albert E.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Traditionally, enzymes have been studied in standardized buffers, but in real life, inside cells, they have to function under conditions far from “ideal”. The intracellular milieu is crowded by numerous molecules with various physical and chemical properties. What consequences does it have for enzymatic reactions? How do enzymes deal with disturbing neighbors? To examine this issue, we studied the mechanisms of influence of seven model substances with different molecular sizes on the reaction catalyzed by bacterial luciferase. This reaction passes through several stages and ends with light emission. We analyzed the responses rate in different stages to the addition of alcohols, saccharides, and biopolymers and found the counteraction of two effects. On the one hand, increased viscosity slows down many of the stages, both associative and dissociative. On the other hand, it is accompanied by an increase in the catalytic constant of luciferase, which compensates for kinetic disadvantages. We assumed that both effects could be caused by the same property of the added substances—their ability to interact with water. Our findings serve not only to shed light on the organization of the cellular metabolism, but also to improve enzyme-based biotechnologies using the recipes of nature. ABSTRACT: A complex heterogeneous intracellular environment seems to affect enzymatic catalysis by changing the mobility of biomolecules, their stability, and their conformational states, as well as by facilitating or hindering continuously occurring interactions. The evaluation and description of the influence of the cytoplasmic matrix components on enzymatic activity are problems that remain unsolved. In this work, we aimed to determine the mechanisms of action of two-component media with cosolvents of various molecular sizes on the complex multi-stage bioluminescent reaction catalyzed by bacterial luciferase. Kinetic and structural effects of ethylene glycol, glycerol, sorbitol, glucose, sucrose, dextran, and polyethylene glycol on bacterial luciferase were studied using stopped-flow and fluorescence spectroscopy techniques and molecular dynamics simulations. We have found that diffusion limitations in the presence of cosolvents promote the stabilization of flavin substrate and peroxyflavin intermediate of the reaction, but do not provide any advantages in bioluminescence quantum yield, because substrate binding is slowed down as well. The catalytic constant of bacterial luciferase has been found to be viscosity-independent and correlated with parameters of water–cosolvent interactions (Norrish constant, van der Waals interaction energies). Crowding agents, in contrast to low-molecular-weight cosolvents, had little effect on peroxyflavin intermediate decay and enzyme catalytic constant. We attributed specific kinetic effects to the preferential interaction of the cosolvents with enzyme surface and their penetration into the active site.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10301326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103013262023-06-29 The Role of Cosolvent–Water Interactions in Effects of the Media on Functionality of Enzymes: A Case Study of Photobacterium leiognathi Luciferase Lisitsa, Albert E. Sukovatyi, Lev A. Deeva, Anna A. Gulnov, Dmitry V. Esimbekova, Elena N. Kratasyuk, Valentina A. Nemtseva, Elena V. Life (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Traditionally, enzymes have been studied in standardized buffers, but in real life, inside cells, they have to function under conditions far from “ideal”. The intracellular milieu is crowded by numerous molecules with various physical and chemical properties. What consequences does it have for enzymatic reactions? How do enzymes deal with disturbing neighbors? To examine this issue, we studied the mechanisms of influence of seven model substances with different molecular sizes on the reaction catalyzed by bacterial luciferase. This reaction passes through several stages and ends with light emission. We analyzed the responses rate in different stages to the addition of alcohols, saccharides, and biopolymers and found the counteraction of two effects. On the one hand, increased viscosity slows down many of the stages, both associative and dissociative. On the other hand, it is accompanied by an increase in the catalytic constant of luciferase, which compensates for kinetic disadvantages. We assumed that both effects could be caused by the same property of the added substances—their ability to interact with water. Our findings serve not only to shed light on the organization of the cellular metabolism, but also to improve enzyme-based biotechnologies using the recipes of nature. ABSTRACT: A complex heterogeneous intracellular environment seems to affect enzymatic catalysis by changing the mobility of biomolecules, their stability, and their conformational states, as well as by facilitating or hindering continuously occurring interactions. The evaluation and description of the influence of the cytoplasmic matrix components on enzymatic activity are problems that remain unsolved. In this work, we aimed to determine the mechanisms of action of two-component media with cosolvents of various molecular sizes on the complex multi-stage bioluminescent reaction catalyzed by bacterial luciferase. Kinetic and structural effects of ethylene glycol, glycerol, sorbitol, glucose, sucrose, dextran, and polyethylene glycol on bacterial luciferase were studied using stopped-flow and fluorescence spectroscopy techniques and molecular dynamics simulations. We have found that diffusion limitations in the presence of cosolvents promote the stabilization of flavin substrate and peroxyflavin intermediate of the reaction, but do not provide any advantages in bioluminescence quantum yield, because substrate binding is slowed down as well. The catalytic constant of bacterial luciferase has been found to be viscosity-independent and correlated with parameters of water–cosolvent interactions (Norrish constant, van der Waals interaction energies). Crowding agents, in contrast to low-molecular-weight cosolvents, had little effect on peroxyflavin intermediate decay and enzyme catalytic constant. We attributed specific kinetic effects to the preferential interaction of the cosolvents with enzyme surface and their penetration into the active site. MDPI 2023-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10301326/ /pubmed/37374166 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13061384 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lisitsa, Albert E.
Sukovatyi, Lev A.
Deeva, Anna A.
Gulnov, Dmitry V.
Esimbekova, Elena N.
Kratasyuk, Valentina A.
Nemtseva, Elena V.
The Role of Cosolvent–Water Interactions in Effects of the Media on Functionality of Enzymes: A Case Study of Photobacterium leiognathi Luciferase
title The Role of Cosolvent–Water Interactions in Effects of the Media on Functionality of Enzymes: A Case Study of Photobacterium leiognathi Luciferase
title_full The Role of Cosolvent–Water Interactions in Effects of the Media on Functionality of Enzymes: A Case Study of Photobacterium leiognathi Luciferase
title_fullStr The Role of Cosolvent–Water Interactions in Effects of the Media on Functionality of Enzymes: A Case Study of Photobacterium leiognathi Luciferase
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Cosolvent–Water Interactions in Effects of the Media on Functionality of Enzymes: A Case Study of Photobacterium leiognathi Luciferase
title_short The Role of Cosolvent–Water Interactions in Effects of the Media on Functionality of Enzymes: A Case Study of Photobacterium leiognathi Luciferase
title_sort role of cosolvent–water interactions in effects of the media on functionality of enzymes: a case study of photobacterium leiognathi luciferase
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37374166
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13061384
work_keys_str_mv AT lisitsaalberte theroleofcosolventwaterinteractionsineffectsofthemediaonfunctionalityofenzymesacasestudyofphotobacteriumleiognathiluciferase
AT sukovatyileva theroleofcosolventwaterinteractionsineffectsofthemediaonfunctionalityofenzymesacasestudyofphotobacteriumleiognathiluciferase
AT deevaannaa theroleofcosolventwaterinteractionsineffectsofthemediaonfunctionalityofenzymesacasestudyofphotobacteriumleiognathiluciferase
AT gulnovdmitryv theroleofcosolventwaterinteractionsineffectsofthemediaonfunctionalityofenzymesacasestudyofphotobacteriumleiognathiluciferase
AT esimbekovaelenan theroleofcosolventwaterinteractionsineffectsofthemediaonfunctionalityofenzymesacasestudyofphotobacteriumleiognathiluciferase
AT kratasyukvalentinaa theroleofcosolventwaterinteractionsineffectsofthemediaonfunctionalityofenzymesacasestudyofphotobacteriumleiognathiluciferase
AT nemtsevaelenav theroleofcosolventwaterinteractionsineffectsofthemediaonfunctionalityofenzymesacasestudyofphotobacteriumleiognathiluciferase
AT lisitsaalberte roleofcosolventwaterinteractionsineffectsofthemediaonfunctionalityofenzymesacasestudyofphotobacteriumleiognathiluciferase
AT sukovatyileva roleofcosolventwaterinteractionsineffectsofthemediaonfunctionalityofenzymesacasestudyofphotobacteriumleiognathiluciferase
AT deevaannaa roleofcosolventwaterinteractionsineffectsofthemediaonfunctionalityofenzymesacasestudyofphotobacteriumleiognathiluciferase
AT gulnovdmitryv roleofcosolventwaterinteractionsineffectsofthemediaonfunctionalityofenzymesacasestudyofphotobacteriumleiognathiluciferase
AT esimbekovaelenan roleofcosolventwaterinteractionsineffectsofthemediaonfunctionalityofenzymesacasestudyofphotobacteriumleiognathiluciferase
AT kratasyukvalentinaa roleofcosolventwaterinteractionsineffectsofthemediaonfunctionalityofenzymesacasestudyofphotobacteriumleiognathiluciferase
AT nemtsevaelenav roleofcosolventwaterinteractionsineffectsofthemediaonfunctionalityofenzymesacasestudyofphotobacteriumleiognathiluciferase