Cargando…

Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review

Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is characterized by complex-shaped tumors and numerous organs at risk (OARs), inducing challenging radiotherapy (RT) planning, optimization, and delivery. In this review, we provided a thorough description of the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) too...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franzese, Ciro, Dei, Damiano, Lambri, Nicola, Teriaca, Maria Ausilia, Badalamenti, Marco, Crespi, Leonardo, Tomatis, Stefano, Loiacono, Daniele, Mancosu, Pietro, Scorsetti, Marta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373935
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13060946
_version_ 1785064837694357504
author Franzese, Ciro
Dei, Damiano
Lambri, Nicola
Teriaca, Maria Ausilia
Badalamenti, Marco
Crespi, Leonardo
Tomatis, Stefano
Loiacono, Daniele
Mancosu, Pietro
Scorsetti, Marta
author_facet Franzese, Ciro
Dei, Damiano
Lambri, Nicola
Teriaca, Maria Ausilia
Badalamenti, Marco
Crespi, Leonardo
Tomatis, Stefano
Loiacono, Daniele
Mancosu, Pietro
Scorsetti, Marta
author_sort Franzese, Ciro
collection PubMed
description Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is characterized by complex-shaped tumors and numerous organs at risk (OARs), inducing challenging radiotherapy (RT) planning, optimization, and delivery. In this review, we provided a thorough description of the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the HNC RT process. Methods: The PubMed database was queried, and a total of 168 articles (2016–2022) were screened by a group of experts in radiation oncology. The group selected 62 articles, which were subdivided into three categories, representing the whole RT workflow: (i) target and OAR contouring, (ii) planning, and (iii) delivery. Results: The majority of the selected studies focused on the OARs segmentation process. Overall, the performance of AI models was evaluated using standard metrics, while limited research was found on how the introduction of AI could impact clinical outcomes. Additionally, papers usually lacked information about the confidence level associated with the predictions made by the AI models. Conclusions: AI represents a promising tool to automate the RT workflow for the complex field of HNC treatment. To ensure that the development of AI technologies in RT is effectively aligned with clinical needs, we suggest conducting future studies within interdisciplinary groups, including clinicians and computer scientists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10301548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103015482023-06-29 Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review Franzese, Ciro Dei, Damiano Lambri, Nicola Teriaca, Maria Ausilia Badalamenti, Marco Crespi, Leonardo Tomatis, Stefano Loiacono, Daniele Mancosu, Pietro Scorsetti, Marta J Pers Med Review Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is characterized by complex-shaped tumors and numerous organs at risk (OARs), inducing challenging radiotherapy (RT) planning, optimization, and delivery. In this review, we provided a thorough description of the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the HNC RT process. Methods: The PubMed database was queried, and a total of 168 articles (2016–2022) were screened by a group of experts in radiation oncology. The group selected 62 articles, which were subdivided into three categories, representing the whole RT workflow: (i) target and OAR contouring, (ii) planning, and (iii) delivery. Results: The majority of the selected studies focused on the OARs segmentation process. Overall, the performance of AI models was evaluated using standard metrics, while limited research was found on how the introduction of AI could impact clinical outcomes. Additionally, papers usually lacked information about the confidence level associated with the predictions made by the AI models. Conclusions: AI represents a promising tool to automate the RT workflow for the complex field of HNC treatment. To ensure that the development of AI technologies in RT is effectively aligned with clinical needs, we suggest conducting future studies within interdisciplinary groups, including clinicians and computer scientists. MDPI 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10301548/ /pubmed/37373935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13060946 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Franzese, Ciro
Dei, Damiano
Lambri, Nicola
Teriaca, Maria Ausilia
Badalamenti, Marco
Crespi, Leonardo
Tomatis, Stefano
Loiacono, Daniele
Mancosu, Pietro
Scorsetti, Marta
Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review
title Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review
title_full Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review
title_short Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review
title_sort enhancing radiotherapy workflow for head and neck cancer with artificial intelligence: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373935
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13060946
work_keys_str_mv AT franzeseciro enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview
AT deidamiano enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview
AT lambrinicola enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview
AT teriacamariaausilia enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview
AT badalamentimarco enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview
AT crespileonardo enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview
AT tomatisstefano enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview
AT loiaconodaniele enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview
AT mancosupietro enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview
AT scorsettimarta enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview