Cargando…
Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review
Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is characterized by complex-shaped tumors and numerous organs at risk (OARs), inducing challenging radiotherapy (RT) planning, optimization, and delivery. In this review, we provided a thorough description of the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) too...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13060946 |
_version_ | 1785064837694357504 |
---|---|
author | Franzese, Ciro Dei, Damiano Lambri, Nicola Teriaca, Maria Ausilia Badalamenti, Marco Crespi, Leonardo Tomatis, Stefano Loiacono, Daniele Mancosu, Pietro Scorsetti, Marta |
author_facet | Franzese, Ciro Dei, Damiano Lambri, Nicola Teriaca, Maria Ausilia Badalamenti, Marco Crespi, Leonardo Tomatis, Stefano Loiacono, Daniele Mancosu, Pietro Scorsetti, Marta |
author_sort | Franzese, Ciro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is characterized by complex-shaped tumors and numerous organs at risk (OARs), inducing challenging radiotherapy (RT) planning, optimization, and delivery. In this review, we provided a thorough description of the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the HNC RT process. Methods: The PubMed database was queried, and a total of 168 articles (2016–2022) were screened by a group of experts in radiation oncology. The group selected 62 articles, which were subdivided into three categories, representing the whole RT workflow: (i) target and OAR contouring, (ii) planning, and (iii) delivery. Results: The majority of the selected studies focused on the OARs segmentation process. Overall, the performance of AI models was evaluated using standard metrics, while limited research was found on how the introduction of AI could impact clinical outcomes. Additionally, papers usually lacked information about the confidence level associated with the predictions made by the AI models. Conclusions: AI represents a promising tool to automate the RT workflow for the complex field of HNC treatment. To ensure that the development of AI technologies in RT is effectively aligned with clinical needs, we suggest conducting future studies within interdisciplinary groups, including clinicians and computer scientists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10301548 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103015482023-06-29 Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review Franzese, Ciro Dei, Damiano Lambri, Nicola Teriaca, Maria Ausilia Badalamenti, Marco Crespi, Leonardo Tomatis, Stefano Loiacono, Daniele Mancosu, Pietro Scorsetti, Marta J Pers Med Review Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) is characterized by complex-shaped tumors and numerous organs at risk (OARs), inducing challenging radiotherapy (RT) planning, optimization, and delivery. In this review, we provided a thorough description of the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the HNC RT process. Methods: The PubMed database was queried, and a total of 168 articles (2016–2022) were screened by a group of experts in radiation oncology. The group selected 62 articles, which were subdivided into three categories, representing the whole RT workflow: (i) target and OAR contouring, (ii) planning, and (iii) delivery. Results: The majority of the selected studies focused on the OARs segmentation process. Overall, the performance of AI models was evaluated using standard metrics, while limited research was found on how the introduction of AI could impact clinical outcomes. Additionally, papers usually lacked information about the confidence level associated with the predictions made by the AI models. Conclusions: AI represents a promising tool to automate the RT workflow for the complex field of HNC treatment. To ensure that the development of AI technologies in RT is effectively aligned with clinical needs, we suggest conducting future studies within interdisciplinary groups, including clinicians and computer scientists. MDPI 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10301548/ /pubmed/37373935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13060946 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Franzese, Ciro Dei, Damiano Lambri, Nicola Teriaca, Maria Ausilia Badalamenti, Marco Crespi, Leonardo Tomatis, Stefano Loiacono, Daniele Mancosu, Pietro Scorsetti, Marta Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review |
title | Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | enhancing radiotherapy workflow for head and neck cancer with artificial intelligence: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37373935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13060946 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT franzeseciro enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview AT deidamiano enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview AT lambrinicola enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview AT teriacamariaausilia enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview AT badalamentimarco enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview AT crespileonardo enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview AT tomatisstefano enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview AT loiaconodaniele enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview AT mancosupietro enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview AT scorsettimarta enhancingradiotherapyworkflowforheadandneckcancerwithartificialintelligenceasystematicreview |