Cargando…
Terrain Characterization via Machine vs. Deep Learning Using Remote Sensing
Terrain traversability is critical for developing Go/No-Go maps for ground vehicles, which significantly impact a mission’s success. To predict the mobility of terrain, one must understand the soil characteristics. In-situ measurements performed in the field are the current method of collecting this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420672 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23125505 |
_version_ | 1785064839623737344 |
---|---|
author | Ewing, Jordan Oommen, Thomas Thomas, Jobin Kasaragod, Anush Dobson, Richard Brooks, Colin Jayakumar, Paramsothy Cole, Michael Ersal, Tulga |
author_facet | Ewing, Jordan Oommen, Thomas Thomas, Jobin Kasaragod, Anush Dobson, Richard Brooks, Colin Jayakumar, Paramsothy Cole, Michael Ersal, Tulga |
author_sort | Ewing, Jordan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Terrain traversability is critical for developing Go/No-Go maps for ground vehicles, which significantly impact a mission’s success. To predict the mobility of terrain, one must understand the soil characteristics. In-situ measurements performed in the field are the current method of collecting this information, which is time-consuming, costly, and can be lethal for military operations. This paper investigates an alternative approach using thermal, multispectral, and hyperspectral remote sensing from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platform. Remotely sensed data combined with machine learning (linear, ridge, lasso, partial least squares (PLS), support vector machines (SVM), and k nearest neighbors (KNN)) and deep learning (multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and convolutional neural network (CNN)) are used to perform a comparative study to estimate the soil properties, such as the soil moisture and terrain strength, used to generate prediction maps of these terrain characteristics. This study found that deep learning outperformed machine learning. Specifically, a multi-layer perceptron performed the best for predicting the percent moisture content (R(2)/RMSE = 0.97/1.55) and the soil strength (in PSI), as measured by a cone penetrometer for the averaged 0–6” (CP06) (R(2)/RMSE = 0.95/67) and 0–12” depth (CP12) (R(2)/RMSE = 0.92/94). A Polaris MRZR vehicle was used to test the application of these prediction maps for mobility purposes, and correlations were observed between the CP06 and the rear wheel slip and the CP12 and the vehicle speed. Thus, this study demonstrates the potential of a more rapid, cost-efficient, and safer approach to predict terrain properties for mobility mapping using remote sensing data with machine and deep learning algorithms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10301555 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103015552023-06-29 Terrain Characterization via Machine vs. Deep Learning Using Remote Sensing Ewing, Jordan Oommen, Thomas Thomas, Jobin Kasaragod, Anush Dobson, Richard Brooks, Colin Jayakumar, Paramsothy Cole, Michael Ersal, Tulga Sensors (Basel) Article Terrain traversability is critical for developing Go/No-Go maps for ground vehicles, which significantly impact a mission’s success. To predict the mobility of terrain, one must understand the soil characteristics. In-situ measurements performed in the field are the current method of collecting this information, which is time-consuming, costly, and can be lethal for military operations. This paper investigates an alternative approach using thermal, multispectral, and hyperspectral remote sensing from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platform. Remotely sensed data combined with machine learning (linear, ridge, lasso, partial least squares (PLS), support vector machines (SVM), and k nearest neighbors (KNN)) and deep learning (multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and convolutional neural network (CNN)) are used to perform a comparative study to estimate the soil properties, such as the soil moisture and terrain strength, used to generate prediction maps of these terrain characteristics. This study found that deep learning outperformed machine learning. Specifically, a multi-layer perceptron performed the best for predicting the percent moisture content (R(2)/RMSE = 0.97/1.55) and the soil strength (in PSI), as measured by a cone penetrometer for the averaged 0–6” (CP06) (R(2)/RMSE = 0.95/67) and 0–12” depth (CP12) (R(2)/RMSE = 0.92/94). A Polaris MRZR vehicle was used to test the application of these prediction maps for mobility purposes, and correlations were observed between the CP06 and the rear wheel slip and the CP12 and the vehicle speed. Thus, this study demonstrates the potential of a more rapid, cost-efficient, and safer approach to predict terrain properties for mobility mapping using remote sensing data with machine and deep learning algorithms. MDPI 2023-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10301555/ /pubmed/37420672 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23125505 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ewing, Jordan Oommen, Thomas Thomas, Jobin Kasaragod, Anush Dobson, Richard Brooks, Colin Jayakumar, Paramsothy Cole, Michael Ersal, Tulga Terrain Characterization via Machine vs. Deep Learning Using Remote Sensing |
title | Terrain Characterization via Machine vs. Deep Learning Using Remote Sensing |
title_full | Terrain Characterization via Machine vs. Deep Learning Using Remote Sensing |
title_fullStr | Terrain Characterization via Machine vs. Deep Learning Using Remote Sensing |
title_full_unstemmed | Terrain Characterization via Machine vs. Deep Learning Using Remote Sensing |
title_short | Terrain Characterization via Machine vs. Deep Learning Using Remote Sensing |
title_sort | terrain characterization via machine vs. deep learning using remote sensing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420672 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23125505 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ewingjordan terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing AT oommenthomas terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing AT thomasjobin terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing AT kasaragodanush terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing AT dobsonrichard terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing AT brookscolin terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing AT jayakumarparamsothy terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing AT colemichael terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing AT ersaltulga terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing |