Cargando…

Terrain Characterization via Machine vs. Deep Learning Using Remote Sensing

Terrain traversability is critical for developing Go/No-Go maps for ground vehicles, which significantly impact a mission’s success. To predict the mobility of terrain, one must understand the soil characteristics. In-situ measurements performed in the field are the current method of collecting this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ewing, Jordan, Oommen, Thomas, Thomas, Jobin, Kasaragod, Anush, Dobson, Richard, Brooks, Colin, Jayakumar, Paramsothy, Cole, Michael, Ersal, Tulga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420672
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23125505
_version_ 1785064839623737344
author Ewing, Jordan
Oommen, Thomas
Thomas, Jobin
Kasaragod, Anush
Dobson, Richard
Brooks, Colin
Jayakumar, Paramsothy
Cole, Michael
Ersal, Tulga
author_facet Ewing, Jordan
Oommen, Thomas
Thomas, Jobin
Kasaragod, Anush
Dobson, Richard
Brooks, Colin
Jayakumar, Paramsothy
Cole, Michael
Ersal, Tulga
author_sort Ewing, Jordan
collection PubMed
description Terrain traversability is critical for developing Go/No-Go maps for ground vehicles, which significantly impact a mission’s success. To predict the mobility of terrain, one must understand the soil characteristics. In-situ measurements performed in the field are the current method of collecting this information, which is time-consuming, costly, and can be lethal for military operations. This paper investigates an alternative approach using thermal, multispectral, and hyperspectral remote sensing from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platform. Remotely sensed data combined with machine learning (linear, ridge, lasso, partial least squares (PLS), support vector machines (SVM), and k nearest neighbors (KNN)) and deep learning (multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and convolutional neural network (CNN)) are used to perform a comparative study to estimate the soil properties, such as the soil moisture and terrain strength, used to generate prediction maps of these terrain characteristics. This study found that deep learning outperformed machine learning. Specifically, a multi-layer perceptron performed the best for predicting the percent moisture content (R(2)/RMSE = 0.97/1.55) and the soil strength (in PSI), as measured by a cone penetrometer for the averaged 0–6” (CP06) (R(2)/RMSE = 0.95/67) and 0–12” depth (CP12) (R(2)/RMSE = 0.92/94). A Polaris MRZR vehicle was used to test the application of these prediction maps for mobility purposes, and correlations were observed between the CP06 and the rear wheel slip and the CP12 and the vehicle speed. Thus, this study demonstrates the potential of a more rapid, cost-efficient, and safer approach to predict terrain properties for mobility mapping using remote sensing data with machine and deep learning algorithms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10301555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103015552023-06-29 Terrain Characterization via Machine vs. Deep Learning Using Remote Sensing Ewing, Jordan Oommen, Thomas Thomas, Jobin Kasaragod, Anush Dobson, Richard Brooks, Colin Jayakumar, Paramsothy Cole, Michael Ersal, Tulga Sensors (Basel) Article Terrain traversability is critical for developing Go/No-Go maps for ground vehicles, which significantly impact a mission’s success. To predict the mobility of terrain, one must understand the soil characteristics. In-situ measurements performed in the field are the current method of collecting this information, which is time-consuming, costly, and can be lethal for military operations. This paper investigates an alternative approach using thermal, multispectral, and hyperspectral remote sensing from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platform. Remotely sensed data combined with machine learning (linear, ridge, lasso, partial least squares (PLS), support vector machines (SVM), and k nearest neighbors (KNN)) and deep learning (multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and convolutional neural network (CNN)) are used to perform a comparative study to estimate the soil properties, such as the soil moisture and terrain strength, used to generate prediction maps of these terrain characteristics. This study found that deep learning outperformed machine learning. Specifically, a multi-layer perceptron performed the best for predicting the percent moisture content (R(2)/RMSE = 0.97/1.55) and the soil strength (in PSI), as measured by a cone penetrometer for the averaged 0–6” (CP06) (R(2)/RMSE = 0.95/67) and 0–12” depth (CP12) (R(2)/RMSE = 0.92/94). A Polaris MRZR vehicle was used to test the application of these prediction maps for mobility purposes, and correlations were observed between the CP06 and the rear wheel slip and the CP12 and the vehicle speed. Thus, this study demonstrates the potential of a more rapid, cost-efficient, and safer approach to predict terrain properties for mobility mapping using remote sensing data with machine and deep learning algorithms. MDPI 2023-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10301555/ /pubmed/37420672 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23125505 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ewing, Jordan
Oommen, Thomas
Thomas, Jobin
Kasaragod, Anush
Dobson, Richard
Brooks, Colin
Jayakumar, Paramsothy
Cole, Michael
Ersal, Tulga
Terrain Characterization via Machine vs. Deep Learning Using Remote Sensing
title Terrain Characterization via Machine vs. Deep Learning Using Remote Sensing
title_full Terrain Characterization via Machine vs. Deep Learning Using Remote Sensing
title_fullStr Terrain Characterization via Machine vs. Deep Learning Using Remote Sensing
title_full_unstemmed Terrain Characterization via Machine vs. Deep Learning Using Remote Sensing
title_short Terrain Characterization via Machine vs. Deep Learning Using Remote Sensing
title_sort terrain characterization via machine vs. deep learning using remote sensing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420672
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23125505
work_keys_str_mv AT ewingjordan terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing
AT oommenthomas terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing
AT thomasjobin terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing
AT kasaragodanush terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing
AT dobsonrichard terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing
AT brookscolin terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing
AT jayakumarparamsothy terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing
AT colemichael terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing
AT ersaltulga terraincharacterizationviamachinevsdeeplearningusingremotesensing