Cargando…

Influence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures by Surgical Versus Conservative Management in Adult Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objective: This meta-analysis was performed to compare the effectiveness of surgical treatment and conservative treatment in adult ankle fractures. Methods: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane-Library databases were searched to retrieve prospective randomized-controlled studies that compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Hui, Guo, Xiao-Bo, Zhao, Jin-Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37374356
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061152
_version_ 1785064894086774784
author Peng, Hui
Guo, Xiao-Bo
Zhao, Jin-Min
author_facet Peng, Hui
Guo, Xiao-Bo
Zhao, Jin-Min
author_sort Peng, Hui
collection PubMed
description Background and Objective: This meta-analysis was performed to compare the effectiveness of surgical treatment and conservative treatment in adult ankle fractures. Methods: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane-Library databases were searched to retrieve prospective randomized-controlled studies that compared the efficacy of surgical treatment and conservative treatment in adult ankle fractures. The meta package in R language was used to organize and analyze the obtained data. Results: A total of eight studies involving 2081 patients was considered eligible, including 1029 patients receiving surgical treatment and 1052 receiving conservative treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered on PROSPERO, and the registration number is CRD42018520164. Olerud and Molander ankle-fracture scores (OMAS) and the health survey 12-item Short-Form (SF-12) were used as main outcome indicators, and the follow-up outcomes were grouped according to the follow-up time. Meta-analysis results showed significantly higher OMAS scores in patients receiving surgical treatment than those with conservative treatment at six months (MD = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.07; 1.93) and over 24 months (MD = 3.10, 95% CI: 2.46; 3.74), while this statistical significance was absent at 12–24 months (MD = 0.08, 95% CI: −5.80; 5.96). At six months and 12 months after treatment, patients receiving surgical treatment exhibited significantly higher SF12-physical results than those receiving conservative treatment (MD = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.89; 2.91). The MD of SF12-mental data at six months after meta-analysis was −0.81 (95% CI: −1.22; 0.39), and the MD of SF12-mental data at 12+ months was −0.81 (95% CI: −1.22; 0.39). There was no significant difference in SF12-mental results between the two treatment methods after six months, but after 12 months, the SF12-mental results of patients receiving surgical treatment were significantly lower than those of conservative treatment. Conclusions: In the treatment of adult ankle fractures, surgical treatment is more efficacious than conservative treatment in improving early and long-term joint function and physical health of patients, but it is associated with long-term adverse mental health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10301782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103017822023-06-29 Influence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures by Surgical Versus Conservative Management in Adult Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Peng, Hui Guo, Xiao-Bo Zhao, Jin-Min Medicina (Kaunas) Review Background and Objective: This meta-analysis was performed to compare the effectiveness of surgical treatment and conservative treatment in adult ankle fractures. Methods: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane-Library databases were searched to retrieve prospective randomized-controlled studies that compared the efficacy of surgical treatment and conservative treatment in adult ankle fractures. The meta package in R language was used to organize and analyze the obtained data. Results: A total of eight studies involving 2081 patients was considered eligible, including 1029 patients receiving surgical treatment and 1052 receiving conservative treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered on PROSPERO, and the registration number is CRD42018520164. Olerud and Molander ankle-fracture scores (OMAS) and the health survey 12-item Short-Form (SF-12) were used as main outcome indicators, and the follow-up outcomes were grouped according to the follow-up time. Meta-analysis results showed significantly higher OMAS scores in patients receiving surgical treatment than those with conservative treatment at six months (MD = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.07; 1.93) and over 24 months (MD = 3.10, 95% CI: 2.46; 3.74), while this statistical significance was absent at 12–24 months (MD = 0.08, 95% CI: −5.80; 5.96). At six months and 12 months after treatment, patients receiving surgical treatment exhibited significantly higher SF12-physical results than those receiving conservative treatment (MD = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.89; 2.91). The MD of SF12-mental data at six months after meta-analysis was −0.81 (95% CI: −1.22; 0.39), and the MD of SF12-mental data at 12+ months was −0.81 (95% CI: −1.22; 0.39). There was no significant difference in SF12-mental results between the two treatment methods after six months, but after 12 months, the SF12-mental results of patients receiving surgical treatment were significantly lower than those of conservative treatment. Conclusions: In the treatment of adult ankle fractures, surgical treatment is more efficacious than conservative treatment in improving early and long-term joint function and physical health of patients, but it is associated with long-term adverse mental health. MDPI 2023-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10301782/ /pubmed/37374356 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061152 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Peng, Hui
Guo, Xiao-Bo
Zhao, Jin-Min
Influence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures by Surgical Versus Conservative Management in Adult Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Influence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures by Surgical Versus Conservative Management in Adult Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Influence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures by Surgical Versus Conservative Management in Adult Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Influence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures by Surgical Versus Conservative Management in Adult Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures by Surgical Versus Conservative Management in Adult Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Influence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures by Surgical Versus Conservative Management in Adult Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort influence of patient-reported outcome measures by surgical versus conservative management in adult ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37374356
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061152
work_keys_str_mv AT penghui influenceofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresbysurgicalversusconservativemanagementinadultanklefracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guoxiaobo influenceofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresbysurgicalversusconservativemanagementinadultanklefracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaojinmin influenceofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresbysurgicalversusconservativemanagementinadultanklefracturesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis