Cargando…

Practical Method to Evaluate the Stiffness of Fractured Radius

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are one of the most common fractures of the upper extremity system. To evaluate the performance of DRF treatments, the construct (i.e., a DRF fixed by an implant) was compressed at the distal radius in the axial direction to evaluate the compressive stiffness. In previ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noraphaiphipaksa, Nitikorn, Katepun, Surangkana, Waitayawinyu, Thanapong, Kanchanomai, Chaosuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37368000
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps6030056
_version_ 1785064922722336768
author Noraphaiphipaksa, Nitikorn
Katepun, Surangkana
Waitayawinyu, Thanapong
Kanchanomai, Chaosuan
author_facet Noraphaiphipaksa, Nitikorn
Katepun, Surangkana
Waitayawinyu, Thanapong
Kanchanomai, Chaosuan
author_sort Noraphaiphipaksa, Nitikorn
collection PubMed
description Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are one of the most common fractures of the upper extremity system. To evaluate the performance of DRF treatments, the construct (i.e., a DRF fixed by an implant) was compressed at the distal radius in the axial direction to evaluate the compressive stiffness. In previous studies, various constructs of both cadaveric and synthetic radii have been proposed for biomechanical testing for DRF. Unfortunately, high deviations of the measured stiffness have been reported across the literature, which may relate to the inconsistency of applied mechanical actions (i.e., the tested radii may under various combinations including compression, bending, and shear). In the present study, a biomechanical apparatus and an experimental procedure were proposed for the biomechanical testing of radii under pure compression. After the biomechanical tests of synthetic radii, it was found that the standard deviation of stiffness was significantly lower than that in previous studies. Thus, the biomechanical apparatus and the experimental procedure were proven to be a practical method for the evaluation of radii stiffness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10301903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103019032023-06-29 Practical Method to Evaluate the Stiffness of Fractured Radius Noraphaiphipaksa, Nitikorn Katepun, Surangkana Waitayawinyu, Thanapong Kanchanomai, Chaosuan Methods Protoc Article Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are one of the most common fractures of the upper extremity system. To evaluate the performance of DRF treatments, the construct (i.e., a DRF fixed by an implant) was compressed at the distal radius in the axial direction to evaluate the compressive stiffness. In previous studies, various constructs of both cadaveric and synthetic radii have been proposed for biomechanical testing for DRF. Unfortunately, high deviations of the measured stiffness have been reported across the literature, which may relate to the inconsistency of applied mechanical actions (i.e., the tested radii may under various combinations including compression, bending, and shear). In the present study, a biomechanical apparatus and an experimental procedure were proposed for the biomechanical testing of radii under pure compression. After the biomechanical tests of synthetic radii, it was found that the standard deviation of stiffness was significantly lower than that in previous studies. Thus, the biomechanical apparatus and the experimental procedure were proven to be a practical method for the evaluation of radii stiffness. MDPI 2023-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10301903/ /pubmed/37368000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps6030056 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Noraphaiphipaksa, Nitikorn
Katepun, Surangkana
Waitayawinyu, Thanapong
Kanchanomai, Chaosuan
Practical Method to Evaluate the Stiffness of Fractured Radius
title Practical Method to Evaluate the Stiffness of Fractured Radius
title_full Practical Method to Evaluate the Stiffness of Fractured Radius
title_fullStr Practical Method to Evaluate the Stiffness of Fractured Radius
title_full_unstemmed Practical Method to Evaluate the Stiffness of Fractured Radius
title_short Practical Method to Evaluate the Stiffness of Fractured Radius
title_sort practical method to evaluate the stiffness of fractured radius
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37368000
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps6030056
work_keys_str_mv AT noraphaiphipaksanitikorn practicalmethodtoevaluatethestiffnessoffracturedradius
AT katepunsurangkana practicalmethodtoevaluatethestiffnessoffracturedradius
AT waitayawinyuthanapong practicalmethodtoevaluatethestiffnessoffracturedradius
AT kanchanomaichaosuan practicalmethodtoevaluatethestiffnessoffracturedradius