Cargando…
Practical Method to Evaluate the Stiffness of Fractured Radius
Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are one of the most common fractures of the upper extremity system. To evaluate the performance of DRF treatments, the construct (i.e., a DRF fixed by an implant) was compressed at the distal radius in the axial direction to evaluate the compressive stiffness. In previ...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37368000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps6030056 |
_version_ | 1785064922722336768 |
---|---|
author | Noraphaiphipaksa, Nitikorn Katepun, Surangkana Waitayawinyu, Thanapong Kanchanomai, Chaosuan |
author_facet | Noraphaiphipaksa, Nitikorn Katepun, Surangkana Waitayawinyu, Thanapong Kanchanomai, Chaosuan |
author_sort | Noraphaiphipaksa, Nitikorn |
collection | PubMed |
description | Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are one of the most common fractures of the upper extremity system. To evaluate the performance of DRF treatments, the construct (i.e., a DRF fixed by an implant) was compressed at the distal radius in the axial direction to evaluate the compressive stiffness. In previous studies, various constructs of both cadaveric and synthetic radii have been proposed for biomechanical testing for DRF. Unfortunately, high deviations of the measured stiffness have been reported across the literature, which may relate to the inconsistency of applied mechanical actions (i.e., the tested radii may under various combinations including compression, bending, and shear). In the present study, a biomechanical apparatus and an experimental procedure were proposed for the biomechanical testing of radii under pure compression. After the biomechanical tests of synthetic radii, it was found that the standard deviation of stiffness was significantly lower than that in previous studies. Thus, the biomechanical apparatus and the experimental procedure were proven to be a practical method for the evaluation of radii stiffness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10301903 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103019032023-06-29 Practical Method to Evaluate the Stiffness of Fractured Radius Noraphaiphipaksa, Nitikorn Katepun, Surangkana Waitayawinyu, Thanapong Kanchanomai, Chaosuan Methods Protoc Article Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are one of the most common fractures of the upper extremity system. To evaluate the performance of DRF treatments, the construct (i.e., a DRF fixed by an implant) was compressed at the distal radius in the axial direction to evaluate the compressive stiffness. In previous studies, various constructs of both cadaveric and synthetic radii have been proposed for biomechanical testing for DRF. Unfortunately, high deviations of the measured stiffness have been reported across the literature, which may relate to the inconsistency of applied mechanical actions (i.e., the tested radii may under various combinations including compression, bending, and shear). In the present study, a biomechanical apparatus and an experimental procedure were proposed for the biomechanical testing of radii under pure compression. After the biomechanical tests of synthetic radii, it was found that the standard deviation of stiffness was significantly lower than that in previous studies. Thus, the biomechanical apparatus and the experimental procedure were proven to be a practical method for the evaluation of radii stiffness. MDPI 2023-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10301903/ /pubmed/37368000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps6030056 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Noraphaiphipaksa, Nitikorn Katepun, Surangkana Waitayawinyu, Thanapong Kanchanomai, Chaosuan Practical Method to Evaluate the Stiffness of Fractured Radius |
title | Practical Method to Evaluate the Stiffness of Fractured Radius |
title_full | Practical Method to Evaluate the Stiffness of Fractured Radius |
title_fullStr | Practical Method to Evaluate the Stiffness of Fractured Radius |
title_full_unstemmed | Practical Method to Evaluate the Stiffness of Fractured Radius |
title_short | Practical Method to Evaluate the Stiffness of Fractured Radius |
title_sort | practical method to evaluate the stiffness of fractured radius |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37368000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mps6030056 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noraphaiphipaksanitikorn practicalmethodtoevaluatethestiffnessoffracturedradius AT katepunsurangkana practicalmethodtoevaluatethestiffnessoffracturedradius AT waitayawinyuthanapong practicalmethodtoevaluatethestiffnessoffracturedradius AT kanchanomaichaosuan practicalmethodtoevaluatethestiffnessoffracturedradius |