Cargando…

Re-Irradiation with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Recurrent Cervical Cancer in the Pelvis: An Analysis of Outcomes and Toxicity

Background and Objectives: Treatment options for most patients with recurrent cervical cancer within the previously irradiated field are limited. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of re-irradiation using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with cervical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Hye Jin, Kwak, Yoo-Kang, Lee, So Jung, Kim, Myungsoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10302383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37374368
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061164
_version_ 1785065033598763008
author Kang, Hye Jin
Kwak, Yoo-Kang
Lee, So Jung
Kim, Myungsoo
author_facet Kang, Hye Jin
Kwak, Yoo-Kang
Lee, So Jung
Kim, Myungsoo
author_sort Kang, Hye Jin
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Treatment options for most patients with recurrent cervical cancer within the previously irradiated field are limited. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of re-irradiation using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with cervical cancer who experienced intrapelvic recurrence. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 22 patients with recurrent cervical cancer who were treated with re-irradiation for intrapelvic recurrence using IMRT between July 2006 and July 2020. The irradiation dose and volume were determined based on the range considered safe for the tumor size, location, and previous irradiation dose. Results: The median follow-up period was 15 months (range: 3–120) and the overall response rate was 63.6%. Of the symptomatic patients, 90% experienced symptom relief after treatment. The 1- and 2-year local progression-free survival (LPFS) rates were 36.8% and 30.7%, respectively, whereas the 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 68.2% and 25.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the interval between irradiations and gross tumor volume (GTV) were significant prognostic factors for LPFS. The response to re-irradiation showed borderline statistical significance for LPFS. The GTV and response to re-irradiation were also independent prognostic factors for OS. Grade 3 late toxicities were observed in 4 (18.2%) of the 22 patients. Recto- or vesico-vaginal fistula occurred in four patients. The irradiation dose was associated with fistula formation with borderline significance. Conclusions: Re-irradiation using IMRT is a safe and effective treatment strategy for patients with recurrent cervical cancer who previously received RT. Interval between irradiations, tumor size, response to re-irradiation, and radiation dose were the main factors affecting efficacy and safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10302383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103023832023-06-29 Re-Irradiation with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Recurrent Cervical Cancer in the Pelvis: An Analysis of Outcomes and Toxicity Kang, Hye Jin Kwak, Yoo-Kang Lee, So Jung Kim, Myungsoo Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Treatment options for most patients with recurrent cervical cancer within the previously irradiated field are limited. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of re-irradiation using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with cervical cancer who experienced intrapelvic recurrence. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 22 patients with recurrent cervical cancer who were treated with re-irradiation for intrapelvic recurrence using IMRT between July 2006 and July 2020. The irradiation dose and volume were determined based on the range considered safe for the tumor size, location, and previous irradiation dose. Results: The median follow-up period was 15 months (range: 3–120) and the overall response rate was 63.6%. Of the symptomatic patients, 90% experienced symptom relief after treatment. The 1- and 2-year local progression-free survival (LPFS) rates were 36.8% and 30.7%, respectively, whereas the 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 68.2% and 25.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the interval between irradiations and gross tumor volume (GTV) were significant prognostic factors for LPFS. The response to re-irradiation showed borderline statistical significance for LPFS. The GTV and response to re-irradiation were also independent prognostic factors for OS. Grade 3 late toxicities were observed in 4 (18.2%) of the 22 patients. Recto- or vesico-vaginal fistula occurred in four patients. The irradiation dose was associated with fistula formation with borderline significance. Conclusions: Re-irradiation using IMRT is a safe and effective treatment strategy for patients with recurrent cervical cancer who previously received RT. Interval between irradiations, tumor size, response to re-irradiation, and radiation dose were the main factors affecting efficacy and safety. MDPI 2023-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10302383/ /pubmed/37374368 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061164 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kang, Hye Jin
Kwak, Yoo-Kang
Lee, So Jung
Kim, Myungsoo
Re-Irradiation with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Recurrent Cervical Cancer in the Pelvis: An Analysis of Outcomes and Toxicity
title Re-Irradiation with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Recurrent Cervical Cancer in the Pelvis: An Analysis of Outcomes and Toxicity
title_full Re-Irradiation with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Recurrent Cervical Cancer in the Pelvis: An Analysis of Outcomes and Toxicity
title_fullStr Re-Irradiation with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Recurrent Cervical Cancer in the Pelvis: An Analysis of Outcomes and Toxicity
title_full_unstemmed Re-Irradiation with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Recurrent Cervical Cancer in the Pelvis: An Analysis of Outcomes and Toxicity
title_short Re-Irradiation with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Recurrent Cervical Cancer in the Pelvis: An Analysis of Outcomes and Toxicity
title_sort re-irradiation with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of recurrent cervical cancer in the pelvis: an analysis of outcomes and toxicity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10302383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37374368
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061164
work_keys_str_mv AT kanghyejin reirradiationwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofrecurrentcervicalcancerinthepelvisananalysisofoutcomesandtoxicity
AT kwakyookang reirradiationwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofrecurrentcervicalcancerinthepelvisananalysisofoutcomesandtoxicity
AT leesojung reirradiationwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofrecurrentcervicalcancerinthepelvisananalysisofoutcomesandtoxicity
AT kimmyungsoo reirradiationwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforthetreatmentofrecurrentcervicalcancerinthepelvisananalysisofoutcomesandtoxicity