Cargando…

Knowledge and attitudes of Chinese medical postgraduates toward research ethics and research ethics committees: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Research ethics provides the ethical standards for conducting sound and safe research. The field of medical research in China is rapidly growing and facing various ethical challenges. However, in China, little empirical research has been conducted on the knowledge and attitudes of medica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xing, Wang, Xianxiong, Wu, Ying, Yu, Haitao, Yang, Min, Khoshnood, Kaveh, Luo, Esther, Wang, Xiaomin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10303304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37380977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04459-y
_version_ 1785065246596005888
author Liu, Xing
Wang, Xianxiong
Wu, Ying
Yu, Haitao
Yang, Min
Khoshnood, Kaveh
Luo, Esther
Wang, Xiaomin
author_facet Liu, Xing
Wang, Xianxiong
Wu, Ying
Yu, Haitao
Yang, Min
Khoshnood, Kaveh
Luo, Esther
Wang, Xiaomin
author_sort Liu, Xing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research ethics provides the ethical standards for conducting sound and safe research. The field of medical research in China is rapidly growing and facing various ethical challenges. However, in China, little empirical research has been conducted on the knowledge and attitudes of medical postgraduates toward research ethics and RECs. It is critical for medical postgraduates to develop a proper knowledge of research ethics at the beginning of their careers. The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and attitudes of medical postgraduates toward research ethics and RECs. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted from May to July 2021 at a medical school and two affiliated hospitals in south-central China. The instrument of the study was an online survey that was distributed via WeChat. RESULTS: We found that only 46.7% were familiar with the ethical guidelines for research with human subjects. In addition, 63.2% of participants were familiar with the RECs that reviewed their research, and 90.7% perceived RECs as helpful. However, only 36.8% were fully aware of the functions of RECs. In the meantime, 30.7% believed that review by an REC would delay research and make it more difficult for researchers. Furthermore, most participants (94.9%) believed that a course on research ethics should be mandatory for medical postgraduates. Finally, 27.4% of the respondents considered the fabrication of some data or results to be acceptable. CONCLUSION: This paper serves to suggest that research ethics education should be prioritized in medical ethics curriculum, and course syllabi or teaching methods should be revised to provide medical postgraduates with a deeper understanding of the principles, regulations, and specifics of research ethics. We also recommend that RECs provide diverse approaches in their review procedure to facilitate the understanding of medical postgraduates of the functions and processes of RECs and to enhance their awareness of research integrity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10303304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103033042023-06-29 Knowledge and attitudes of Chinese medical postgraduates toward research ethics and research ethics committees: a cross-sectional study Liu, Xing Wang, Xianxiong Wu, Ying Yu, Haitao Yang, Min Khoshnood, Kaveh Luo, Esther Wang, Xiaomin BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Research ethics provides the ethical standards for conducting sound and safe research. The field of medical research in China is rapidly growing and facing various ethical challenges. However, in China, little empirical research has been conducted on the knowledge and attitudes of medical postgraduates toward research ethics and RECs. It is critical for medical postgraduates to develop a proper knowledge of research ethics at the beginning of their careers. The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and attitudes of medical postgraduates toward research ethics and RECs. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted from May to July 2021 at a medical school and two affiliated hospitals in south-central China. The instrument of the study was an online survey that was distributed via WeChat. RESULTS: We found that only 46.7% were familiar with the ethical guidelines for research with human subjects. In addition, 63.2% of participants were familiar with the RECs that reviewed their research, and 90.7% perceived RECs as helpful. However, only 36.8% were fully aware of the functions of RECs. In the meantime, 30.7% believed that review by an REC would delay research and make it more difficult for researchers. Furthermore, most participants (94.9%) believed that a course on research ethics should be mandatory for medical postgraduates. Finally, 27.4% of the respondents considered the fabrication of some data or results to be acceptable. CONCLUSION: This paper serves to suggest that research ethics education should be prioritized in medical ethics curriculum, and course syllabi or teaching methods should be revised to provide medical postgraduates with a deeper understanding of the principles, regulations, and specifics of research ethics. We also recommend that RECs provide diverse approaches in their review procedure to facilitate the understanding of medical postgraduates of the functions and processes of RECs and to enhance their awareness of research integrity. BioMed Central 2023-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10303304/ /pubmed/37380977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04459-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Liu, Xing
Wang, Xianxiong
Wu, Ying
Yu, Haitao
Yang, Min
Khoshnood, Kaveh
Luo, Esther
Wang, Xiaomin
Knowledge and attitudes of Chinese medical postgraduates toward research ethics and research ethics committees: a cross-sectional study
title Knowledge and attitudes of Chinese medical postgraduates toward research ethics and research ethics committees: a cross-sectional study
title_full Knowledge and attitudes of Chinese medical postgraduates toward research ethics and research ethics committees: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Knowledge and attitudes of Chinese medical postgraduates toward research ethics and research ethics committees: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge and attitudes of Chinese medical postgraduates toward research ethics and research ethics committees: a cross-sectional study
title_short Knowledge and attitudes of Chinese medical postgraduates toward research ethics and research ethics committees: a cross-sectional study
title_sort knowledge and attitudes of chinese medical postgraduates toward research ethics and research ethics committees: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10303304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37380977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04459-y
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxing knowledgeandattitudesofchinesemedicalpostgraduatestowardresearchethicsandresearchethicscommitteesacrosssectionalstudy
AT wangxianxiong knowledgeandattitudesofchinesemedicalpostgraduatestowardresearchethicsandresearchethicscommitteesacrosssectionalstudy
AT wuying knowledgeandattitudesofchinesemedicalpostgraduatestowardresearchethicsandresearchethicscommitteesacrosssectionalstudy
AT yuhaitao knowledgeandattitudesofchinesemedicalpostgraduatestowardresearchethicsandresearchethicscommitteesacrosssectionalstudy
AT yangmin knowledgeandattitudesofchinesemedicalpostgraduatestowardresearchethicsandresearchethicscommitteesacrosssectionalstudy
AT khoshnoodkaveh knowledgeandattitudesofchinesemedicalpostgraduatestowardresearchethicsandresearchethicscommitteesacrosssectionalstudy
AT luoesther knowledgeandattitudesofchinesemedicalpostgraduatestowardresearchethicsandresearchethicscommitteesacrosssectionalstudy
AT wangxiaomin knowledgeandattitudesofchinesemedicalpostgraduatestowardresearchethicsandresearchethicscommitteesacrosssectionalstudy