Cargando…
Pre-transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient and its clinical application: A comparison study
BACKGROUND: It is controversial whether transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement can improve long-term survival. AIM: To assess whether TIPS placement improves survival in patients with hepatic-venous-pressure-gradient (HVPG) ≥ 16 mmHg, based on HVPG-related risk stratification...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10303515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37389231 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i22.3519 |
_version_ | 1785065295157657600 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Xi-Xuan Yin, Xiao-Chun Gu, Li-Hong Guo, Hui-Wen Cheng, Yang Liu, Yan Xiao, Jiang-Qiang Wang, Yi Zhang, Wei Zou, Xiao-Ping Wang, Lei Zhang, Ming Zhu-Ge, Yu-Zheng Zhang, Feng |
author_facet | Wang, Xi-Xuan Yin, Xiao-Chun Gu, Li-Hong Guo, Hui-Wen Cheng, Yang Liu, Yan Xiao, Jiang-Qiang Wang, Yi Zhang, Wei Zou, Xiao-Ping Wang, Lei Zhang, Ming Zhu-Ge, Yu-Zheng Zhang, Feng |
author_sort | Wang, Xi-Xuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It is controversial whether transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement can improve long-term survival. AIM: To assess whether TIPS placement improves survival in patients with hepatic-venous-pressure-gradient (HVPG) ≥ 16 mmHg, based on HVPG-related risk stratification. METHODS: Consecutive variceal bleeding patients treated with endoscopic therapy + nonselective β-blockers (NSBBs) or covered TIPS placement were retrospectively enrolled between January 2013 and December 2019. HVPG measurements were performed before therapy. The primary outcome was transplant-free survival; secondary endpoints were rebleeding and overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE). RESULTS: A total of 184 patients were analyzed (mean age, 55.27 years ± 13.86, 107 males; 102 in the EVL+NSBB group, 82 in the covered TIPS group). Based on the HVPG-guided risk stratification, 70 patients had HVPG < 16 mmHg, and 114 patients had HVPG ≥ 16 mmHg. The median follow-up time of the cohort was 49.5 mo. There was no significant difference in transplant-free survival between the two treatment groups overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-1.05; P = 0.07). In the high-HVPG tier, transplant-free survival was higher in the TIPS group (HR, 0.44; 95%CI: 0.23-0.85; P = 0.004). In the low-HVPG tier, transplant-free survival after the two treatments was similar (HR, 0.86; 95%CI: 0.33-0.23; P = 0.74). Covered TIPS placement decreased the rate of rebleeding independent of the HVPG tier (P < 0.001). The difference in OHE between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.09; P = 0.48). CONCLUSION: TIPS placement can effectively improve transplant-free survival when the HVPG is greater than 16 mmHg. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10303515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103035152023-06-29 Pre-transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient and its clinical application: A comparison study Wang, Xi-Xuan Yin, Xiao-Chun Gu, Li-Hong Guo, Hui-Wen Cheng, Yang Liu, Yan Xiao, Jiang-Qiang Wang, Yi Zhang, Wei Zou, Xiao-Ping Wang, Lei Zhang, Ming Zhu-Ge, Yu-Zheng Zhang, Feng World J Gastroenterol Observational Study BACKGROUND: It is controversial whether transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement can improve long-term survival. AIM: To assess whether TIPS placement improves survival in patients with hepatic-venous-pressure-gradient (HVPG) ≥ 16 mmHg, based on HVPG-related risk stratification. METHODS: Consecutive variceal bleeding patients treated with endoscopic therapy + nonselective β-blockers (NSBBs) or covered TIPS placement were retrospectively enrolled between January 2013 and December 2019. HVPG measurements were performed before therapy. The primary outcome was transplant-free survival; secondary endpoints were rebleeding and overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE). RESULTS: A total of 184 patients were analyzed (mean age, 55.27 years ± 13.86, 107 males; 102 in the EVL+NSBB group, 82 in the covered TIPS group). Based on the HVPG-guided risk stratification, 70 patients had HVPG < 16 mmHg, and 114 patients had HVPG ≥ 16 mmHg. The median follow-up time of the cohort was 49.5 mo. There was no significant difference in transplant-free survival between the two treatment groups overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-1.05; P = 0.07). In the high-HVPG tier, transplant-free survival was higher in the TIPS group (HR, 0.44; 95%CI: 0.23-0.85; P = 0.004). In the low-HVPG tier, transplant-free survival after the two treatments was similar (HR, 0.86; 95%CI: 0.33-0.23; P = 0.74). Covered TIPS placement decreased the rate of rebleeding independent of the HVPG tier (P < 0.001). The difference in OHE between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.09; P = 0.48). CONCLUSION: TIPS placement can effectively improve transplant-free survival when the HVPG is greater than 16 mmHg. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-06-14 2023-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10303515/ /pubmed/37389231 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i22.3519 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Observational Study Wang, Xi-Xuan Yin, Xiao-Chun Gu, Li-Hong Guo, Hui-Wen Cheng, Yang Liu, Yan Xiao, Jiang-Qiang Wang, Yi Zhang, Wei Zou, Xiao-Ping Wang, Lei Zhang, Ming Zhu-Ge, Yu-Zheng Zhang, Feng Pre-transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient and its clinical application: A comparison study |
title | Pre-transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient and its clinical application: A comparison study |
title_full | Pre-transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient and its clinical application: A comparison study |
title_fullStr | Pre-transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient and its clinical application: A comparison study |
title_full_unstemmed | Pre-transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient and its clinical application: A comparison study |
title_short | Pre-transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient and its clinical application: A comparison study |
title_sort | pre-transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient and its clinical application: a comparison study |
topic | Observational Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10303515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37389231 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i22.3519 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangxixuan pretransjugularintrahepaticportosystemicshuntmeasurementofhepaticvenouspressuregradientanditsclinicalapplicationacomparisonstudy AT yinxiaochun pretransjugularintrahepaticportosystemicshuntmeasurementofhepaticvenouspressuregradientanditsclinicalapplicationacomparisonstudy AT gulihong pretransjugularintrahepaticportosystemicshuntmeasurementofhepaticvenouspressuregradientanditsclinicalapplicationacomparisonstudy AT guohuiwen pretransjugularintrahepaticportosystemicshuntmeasurementofhepaticvenouspressuregradientanditsclinicalapplicationacomparisonstudy AT chengyang pretransjugularintrahepaticportosystemicshuntmeasurementofhepaticvenouspressuregradientanditsclinicalapplicationacomparisonstudy AT liuyan pretransjugularintrahepaticportosystemicshuntmeasurementofhepaticvenouspressuregradientanditsclinicalapplicationacomparisonstudy AT xiaojiangqiang pretransjugularintrahepaticportosystemicshuntmeasurementofhepaticvenouspressuregradientanditsclinicalapplicationacomparisonstudy AT wangyi pretransjugularintrahepaticportosystemicshuntmeasurementofhepaticvenouspressuregradientanditsclinicalapplicationacomparisonstudy AT zhangwei pretransjugularintrahepaticportosystemicshuntmeasurementofhepaticvenouspressuregradientanditsclinicalapplicationacomparisonstudy AT zouxiaoping pretransjugularintrahepaticportosystemicshuntmeasurementofhepaticvenouspressuregradientanditsclinicalapplicationacomparisonstudy AT wanglei pretransjugularintrahepaticportosystemicshuntmeasurementofhepaticvenouspressuregradientanditsclinicalapplicationacomparisonstudy AT zhangming pretransjugularintrahepaticportosystemicshuntmeasurementofhepaticvenouspressuregradientanditsclinicalapplicationacomparisonstudy AT zhugeyuzheng pretransjugularintrahepaticportosystemicshuntmeasurementofhepaticvenouspressuregradientanditsclinicalapplicationacomparisonstudy AT zhangfeng pretransjugularintrahepaticportosystemicshuntmeasurementofhepaticvenouspressuregradientanditsclinicalapplicationacomparisonstudy |