Cargando…

Wavefront Characteristics of a Digital Holographic Optical Element

In this study, a 50 × 50 mm holographic optical element (HOE) with the property of a spherical mirror was recorded digitally on a silver halide photoplate using a wavefront printing method. It consisted of 51 × 96 hologram spots with each spot measuring 0.98 × 0.52 mm. The wavefronts and optical per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Beom-Ryeol, Marichal-Hernández, José Gil, Rodríguez-Ramos, José Manuel, Son, Wook-Ho, Hong, Sunghee, Son, Jung-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10304142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37374814
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi14061229
_version_ 1785065437657038848
author Lee, Beom-Ryeol
Marichal-Hernández, José Gil
Rodríguez-Ramos, José Manuel
Son, Wook-Ho
Hong, Sunghee
Son, Jung-Young
author_facet Lee, Beom-Ryeol
Marichal-Hernández, José Gil
Rodríguez-Ramos, José Manuel
Son, Wook-Ho
Hong, Sunghee
Son, Jung-Young
author_sort Lee, Beom-Ryeol
collection PubMed
description In this study, a 50 × 50 mm holographic optical element (HOE) with the property of a spherical mirror was recorded digitally on a silver halide photoplate using a wavefront printing method. It consisted of 51 × 96 hologram spots with each spot measuring 0.98 × 0.52 mm. The wavefronts and optical performance of the HOE were compared with those of reconstructed images from a point hologram displayed on DMDs of different pixel structures. The same comparison was also performed with an analog-type HOE for a heads-up display and with a spherical mirror. A Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor was used to measure the wavefronts of the diffracted beams from the digital HOE and the holograms as well as the reflected beam from the analog HOE and the mirror when a collimated beam was incident on them. These comparisons revealed that the digital HOE could perform as a spherical mirror, but they also revealed astigmatism—as in the reconstructed images from the holograms on DMDs—and that its focusability was worse than that of the analog HOE and the spherical mirror. A phase map, i.e., the polar coordinate-type presentation of the wavefront, could visualize the wavefront distortions more clearly than the reconstructed wavefronts obtained using Zernike polynomials. The phase map revealed that the wavefront of the digital HOE was more distorted than those of the analog HOE and the spherical mirror.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10304142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103041422023-06-29 Wavefront Characteristics of a Digital Holographic Optical Element Lee, Beom-Ryeol Marichal-Hernández, José Gil Rodríguez-Ramos, José Manuel Son, Wook-Ho Hong, Sunghee Son, Jung-Young Micromachines (Basel) Article In this study, a 50 × 50 mm holographic optical element (HOE) with the property of a spherical mirror was recorded digitally on a silver halide photoplate using a wavefront printing method. It consisted of 51 × 96 hologram spots with each spot measuring 0.98 × 0.52 mm. The wavefronts and optical performance of the HOE were compared with those of reconstructed images from a point hologram displayed on DMDs of different pixel structures. The same comparison was also performed with an analog-type HOE for a heads-up display and with a spherical mirror. A Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor was used to measure the wavefronts of the diffracted beams from the digital HOE and the holograms as well as the reflected beam from the analog HOE and the mirror when a collimated beam was incident on them. These comparisons revealed that the digital HOE could perform as a spherical mirror, but they also revealed astigmatism—as in the reconstructed images from the holograms on DMDs—and that its focusability was worse than that of the analog HOE and the spherical mirror. A phase map, i.e., the polar coordinate-type presentation of the wavefront, could visualize the wavefront distortions more clearly than the reconstructed wavefronts obtained using Zernike polynomials. The phase map revealed that the wavefront of the digital HOE was more distorted than those of the analog HOE and the spherical mirror. MDPI 2023-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10304142/ /pubmed/37374814 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi14061229 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Beom-Ryeol
Marichal-Hernández, José Gil
Rodríguez-Ramos, José Manuel
Son, Wook-Ho
Hong, Sunghee
Son, Jung-Young
Wavefront Characteristics of a Digital Holographic Optical Element
title Wavefront Characteristics of a Digital Holographic Optical Element
title_full Wavefront Characteristics of a Digital Holographic Optical Element
title_fullStr Wavefront Characteristics of a Digital Holographic Optical Element
title_full_unstemmed Wavefront Characteristics of a Digital Holographic Optical Element
title_short Wavefront Characteristics of a Digital Holographic Optical Element
title_sort wavefront characteristics of a digital holographic optical element
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10304142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37374814
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi14061229
work_keys_str_mv AT leebeomryeol wavefrontcharacteristicsofadigitalholographicopticalelement
AT marichalhernandezjosegil wavefrontcharacteristicsofadigitalholographicopticalelement
AT rodriguezramosjosemanuel wavefrontcharacteristicsofadigitalholographicopticalelement
AT sonwookho wavefrontcharacteristicsofadigitalholographicopticalelement
AT hongsunghee wavefrontcharacteristicsofadigitalholographicopticalelement
AT sonjungyoung wavefrontcharacteristicsofadigitalholographicopticalelement