Cargando…
Antibody and Nanobody Radiolabeling with Copper-64: Solid vs. Liquid Target Approach
Antibody and nanobody-based copper-64 radiopharmaceuticals are increasingly being proposed as theranostic tools in multiple human diseases. While the production of copper-64 using solid targets has been established for many years, its use is limited due to the complexity of solid target systems, whi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10304849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37375223 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28124670 |
_version_ | 1785065599168151552 |
---|---|
author | Hrynchak, Ivanna Cocioabă, Diana Fonseca, Alexandra I. Leonte, Radu do Carmo, Sérgio J. C. Cornoiu, Roxana Falcão, Amílcar Niculae, Dana Abrunhosa, Antero J. |
author_facet | Hrynchak, Ivanna Cocioabă, Diana Fonseca, Alexandra I. Leonte, Radu do Carmo, Sérgio J. C. Cornoiu, Roxana Falcão, Amílcar Niculae, Dana Abrunhosa, Antero J. |
author_sort | Hrynchak, Ivanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Antibody and nanobody-based copper-64 radiopharmaceuticals are increasingly being proposed as theranostic tools in multiple human diseases. While the production of copper-64 using solid targets has been established for many years, its use is limited due to the complexity of solid target systems, which are available in only a few cyclotrons worldwide. In contrast, liquid targets, available in virtually in all cyclotrons, constitute a practical and reliable alternative. In this study, we discuss the production, purification, and radiolabeling of antibodies and nanobodies using copper-64 obtained from both solid and liquid targets. Copper-64 production from solid targets was performed on a TR-19 cyclotron with an energy of 11.7 MeV, while liquid target production was obtained by bombarding a nickel-64 solution using an IBA Cyclone Kiube cyclotron with 16.9 MeV on target. Copper-64 was purified from both solid and liquid targets and used to radiolabel NODAGA-Nb, NOTA-Nb, and DOTA-Trastuzumab conjugates. Stability studies were conducted on all radioimmunoconjugates in mouse serum, PBS, and DTPA. Irradiation of the solid target yielded 13.5 ± 0.5 GBq with a beam current of 25 ± 1.2 μA and an irradiation time of 6 h. On the other hand, irradiation of the liquid target resulted in 2.8 ± 1.3 GBq at the end of bombardment (EOB) with a beam current of 54.5 ± 7.8 μA and an irradiation time of 4.1 ± 1.3 h. Successful radiolabeling of NODAGA-Nb, NOTA-Nb, and DOTA-Trastuzumab with copper-64 from both solid and liquid targets was achieved. Specific activities (SA) obtained with the solid target were 0.11, 0.19, and 0.33 MBq/μg for NODAGA-Nb, NOTA-Nb, and DOTA-trastuzumab, respectively. For the liquid target, the corresponding SA values were 0.15, 0.12, and 0.30 MBq/μg. Furthermore, all three radiopharmaceuticals demonstrated stability under the testing conditions. While solid targets have the potential to produce significantly higher activity in a single run, the liquid process offers advantages such as speed, ease of automation, and the feasibility of back-to-back production using a medical cyclotron. In this study, successful radiolabeling of antibodies and nanobodies was achieved using both solid and liquid targets approaches. The radiolabeled compounds exhibited high radiochemical purity and specific activity, rendering them suitable for subsequent in vivo pre-clinical imaging studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10304849 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103048492023-06-29 Antibody and Nanobody Radiolabeling with Copper-64: Solid vs. Liquid Target Approach Hrynchak, Ivanna Cocioabă, Diana Fonseca, Alexandra I. Leonte, Radu do Carmo, Sérgio J. C. Cornoiu, Roxana Falcão, Amílcar Niculae, Dana Abrunhosa, Antero J. Molecules Article Antibody and nanobody-based copper-64 radiopharmaceuticals are increasingly being proposed as theranostic tools in multiple human diseases. While the production of copper-64 using solid targets has been established for many years, its use is limited due to the complexity of solid target systems, which are available in only a few cyclotrons worldwide. In contrast, liquid targets, available in virtually in all cyclotrons, constitute a practical and reliable alternative. In this study, we discuss the production, purification, and radiolabeling of antibodies and nanobodies using copper-64 obtained from both solid and liquid targets. Copper-64 production from solid targets was performed on a TR-19 cyclotron with an energy of 11.7 MeV, while liquid target production was obtained by bombarding a nickel-64 solution using an IBA Cyclone Kiube cyclotron with 16.9 MeV on target. Copper-64 was purified from both solid and liquid targets and used to radiolabel NODAGA-Nb, NOTA-Nb, and DOTA-Trastuzumab conjugates. Stability studies were conducted on all radioimmunoconjugates in mouse serum, PBS, and DTPA. Irradiation of the solid target yielded 13.5 ± 0.5 GBq with a beam current of 25 ± 1.2 μA and an irradiation time of 6 h. On the other hand, irradiation of the liquid target resulted in 2.8 ± 1.3 GBq at the end of bombardment (EOB) with a beam current of 54.5 ± 7.8 μA and an irradiation time of 4.1 ± 1.3 h. Successful radiolabeling of NODAGA-Nb, NOTA-Nb, and DOTA-Trastuzumab with copper-64 from both solid and liquid targets was achieved. Specific activities (SA) obtained with the solid target were 0.11, 0.19, and 0.33 MBq/μg for NODAGA-Nb, NOTA-Nb, and DOTA-trastuzumab, respectively. For the liquid target, the corresponding SA values were 0.15, 0.12, and 0.30 MBq/μg. Furthermore, all three radiopharmaceuticals demonstrated stability under the testing conditions. While solid targets have the potential to produce significantly higher activity in a single run, the liquid process offers advantages such as speed, ease of automation, and the feasibility of back-to-back production using a medical cyclotron. In this study, successful radiolabeling of antibodies and nanobodies was achieved using both solid and liquid targets approaches. The radiolabeled compounds exhibited high radiochemical purity and specific activity, rendering them suitable for subsequent in vivo pre-clinical imaging studies. MDPI 2023-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10304849/ /pubmed/37375223 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28124670 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hrynchak, Ivanna Cocioabă, Diana Fonseca, Alexandra I. Leonte, Radu do Carmo, Sérgio J. C. Cornoiu, Roxana Falcão, Amílcar Niculae, Dana Abrunhosa, Antero J. Antibody and Nanobody Radiolabeling with Copper-64: Solid vs. Liquid Target Approach |
title | Antibody and Nanobody Radiolabeling with Copper-64: Solid vs. Liquid Target Approach |
title_full | Antibody and Nanobody Radiolabeling with Copper-64: Solid vs. Liquid Target Approach |
title_fullStr | Antibody and Nanobody Radiolabeling with Copper-64: Solid vs. Liquid Target Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Antibody and Nanobody Radiolabeling with Copper-64: Solid vs. Liquid Target Approach |
title_short | Antibody and Nanobody Radiolabeling with Copper-64: Solid vs. Liquid Target Approach |
title_sort | antibody and nanobody radiolabeling with copper-64: solid vs. liquid target approach |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10304849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37375223 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28124670 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hrynchakivanna antibodyandnanobodyradiolabelingwithcopper64solidvsliquidtargetapproach AT cocioabadiana antibodyandnanobodyradiolabelingwithcopper64solidvsliquidtargetapproach AT fonsecaalexandrai antibodyandnanobodyradiolabelingwithcopper64solidvsliquidtargetapproach AT leonteradu antibodyandnanobodyradiolabelingwithcopper64solidvsliquidtargetapproach AT docarmosergiojc antibodyandnanobodyradiolabelingwithcopper64solidvsliquidtargetapproach AT cornoiuroxana antibodyandnanobodyradiolabelingwithcopper64solidvsliquidtargetapproach AT falcaoamilcar antibodyandnanobodyradiolabelingwithcopper64solidvsliquidtargetapproach AT niculaedana antibodyandnanobodyradiolabelingwithcopper64solidvsliquidtargetapproach AT abrunhosaanteroj antibodyandnanobodyradiolabelingwithcopper64solidvsliquidtargetapproach |