Cargando…
The Goldberg–Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review
BACKGROUND: The classification of mental disorders used to be based only on people seen by hospital psychiatrists. In fact, most people with a mental disorder were, and are, not seen by psychiatrists because of decisions made prior to psychiatric consultation. The first description of this ‘pathway’...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10304946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37350326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.505 |
_version_ | 1785065619687735296 |
---|---|
author | Huxley, Peter Krayer, Anne Poole, Rob Gromadzka, Alicja Jie, Daniel Lai Nafees, Sadia |
author_facet | Huxley, Peter Krayer, Anne Poole, Rob Gromadzka, Alicja Jie, Daniel Lai Nafees, Sadia |
author_sort | Huxley, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The classification of mental disorders used to be based only on people seen by hospital psychiatrists. In fact, most people with a mental disorder were, and are, not seen by psychiatrists because of decisions made prior to psychiatric consultation. The first description of this ‘pathway’ to care and its levels and filters was published by Goldberg and Huxley in 1980. AIMS: To conduct a review of papers relevant to the application of the Goldberg–Huxley model in the 21st century. METHOD: Systematic review (PROSPERO registration CRD42021270603) of the pathway to psychiatric care in the 21st century. The review concentrates on community surveys and passage through the first filter (consultation in primary care or its equivalent). Ten databases were searched for papers meeting the defined inclusion criteria published between 2000 and 2019 and completed on 15 February 2020. RESULTS: In total, 1824 papers were retrieved, 137 screened fully and 31 included in this review. The results are presented in a table comparing them with previous research. Despite major social, economic and health service changes since 1980, community prevalence and consultation rates remain remarkably consistent and in line with World Health Organization findings. Passage through the first filter is largely unchanged and there is evidence that the same factors operate internationally, especially gender and social parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The Goldberg–Huxley model remains applicable internationally, but this may change owing to an increasingly mixed mental health economy and reduced access to primary care services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10304946 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103049462023-06-29 The Goldberg–Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review Huxley, Peter Krayer, Anne Poole, Rob Gromadzka, Alicja Jie, Daniel Lai Nafees, Sadia BJPsych Open Review BACKGROUND: The classification of mental disorders used to be based only on people seen by hospital psychiatrists. In fact, most people with a mental disorder were, and are, not seen by psychiatrists because of decisions made prior to psychiatric consultation. The first description of this ‘pathway’ to care and its levels and filters was published by Goldberg and Huxley in 1980. AIMS: To conduct a review of papers relevant to the application of the Goldberg–Huxley model in the 21st century. METHOD: Systematic review (PROSPERO registration CRD42021270603) of the pathway to psychiatric care in the 21st century. The review concentrates on community surveys and passage through the first filter (consultation in primary care or its equivalent). Ten databases were searched for papers meeting the defined inclusion criteria published between 2000 and 2019 and completed on 15 February 2020. RESULTS: In total, 1824 papers were retrieved, 137 screened fully and 31 included in this review. The results are presented in a table comparing them with previous research. Despite major social, economic and health service changes since 1980, community prevalence and consultation rates remain remarkably consistent and in line with World Health Organization findings. Passage through the first filter is largely unchanged and there is evidence that the same factors operate internationally, especially gender and social parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The Goldberg–Huxley model remains applicable internationally, but this may change owing to an increasingly mixed mental health economy and reduced access to primary care services. Cambridge University Press 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10304946/ /pubmed/37350326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.505 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Huxley, Peter Krayer, Anne Poole, Rob Gromadzka, Alicja Jie, Daniel Lai Nafees, Sadia The Goldberg–Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review |
title | The Goldberg–Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review |
title_full | The Goldberg–Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review |
title_fullStr | The Goldberg–Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Goldberg–Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review |
title_short | The Goldberg–Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review |
title_sort | goldberg–huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10304946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37350326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.505 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huxleypeter thegoldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview AT krayeranne thegoldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview AT poolerob thegoldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview AT gromadzkaalicja thegoldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview AT jiedaniellai thegoldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview AT nafeessadia thegoldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview AT huxleypeter goldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview AT krayeranne goldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview AT poolerob goldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview AT gromadzkaalicja goldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview AT jiedaniellai goldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview AT nafeessadia goldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview |