Cargando…

The Goldberg–Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review

BACKGROUND: The classification of mental disorders used to be based only on people seen by hospital psychiatrists. In fact, most people with a mental disorder were, and are, not seen by psychiatrists because of decisions made prior to psychiatric consultation. The first description of this ‘pathway’...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huxley, Peter, Krayer, Anne, Poole, Rob, Gromadzka, Alicja, Jie, Daniel Lai, Nafees, Sadia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10304946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37350326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.505
_version_ 1785065619687735296
author Huxley, Peter
Krayer, Anne
Poole, Rob
Gromadzka, Alicja
Jie, Daniel Lai
Nafees, Sadia
author_facet Huxley, Peter
Krayer, Anne
Poole, Rob
Gromadzka, Alicja
Jie, Daniel Lai
Nafees, Sadia
author_sort Huxley, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The classification of mental disorders used to be based only on people seen by hospital psychiatrists. In fact, most people with a mental disorder were, and are, not seen by psychiatrists because of decisions made prior to psychiatric consultation. The first description of this ‘pathway’ to care and its levels and filters was published by Goldberg and Huxley in 1980. AIMS: To conduct a review of papers relevant to the application of the Goldberg–Huxley model in the 21st century. METHOD: Systematic review (PROSPERO registration CRD42021270603) of the pathway to psychiatric care in the 21st century. The review concentrates on community surveys and passage through the first filter (consultation in primary care or its equivalent). Ten databases were searched for papers meeting the defined inclusion criteria published between 2000 and 2019 and completed on 15 February 2020. RESULTS: In total, 1824 papers were retrieved, 137 screened fully and 31 included in this review. The results are presented in a table comparing them with previous research. Despite major social, economic and health service changes since 1980, community prevalence and consultation rates remain remarkably consistent and in line with World Health Organization findings. Passage through the first filter is largely unchanged and there is evidence that the same factors operate internationally, especially gender and social parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The Goldberg–Huxley model remains applicable internationally, but this may change owing to an increasingly mixed mental health economy and reduced access to primary care services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10304946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103049462023-06-29 The Goldberg–Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review Huxley, Peter Krayer, Anne Poole, Rob Gromadzka, Alicja Jie, Daniel Lai Nafees, Sadia BJPsych Open Review BACKGROUND: The classification of mental disorders used to be based only on people seen by hospital psychiatrists. In fact, most people with a mental disorder were, and are, not seen by psychiatrists because of decisions made prior to psychiatric consultation. The first description of this ‘pathway’ to care and its levels and filters was published by Goldberg and Huxley in 1980. AIMS: To conduct a review of papers relevant to the application of the Goldberg–Huxley model in the 21st century. METHOD: Systematic review (PROSPERO registration CRD42021270603) of the pathway to psychiatric care in the 21st century. The review concentrates on community surveys and passage through the first filter (consultation in primary care or its equivalent). Ten databases were searched for papers meeting the defined inclusion criteria published between 2000 and 2019 and completed on 15 February 2020. RESULTS: In total, 1824 papers were retrieved, 137 screened fully and 31 included in this review. The results are presented in a table comparing them with previous research. Despite major social, economic and health service changes since 1980, community prevalence and consultation rates remain remarkably consistent and in line with World Health Organization findings. Passage through the first filter is largely unchanged and there is evidence that the same factors operate internationally, especially gender and social parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The Goldberg–Huxley model remains applicable internationally, but this may change owing to an increasingly mixed mental health economy and reduced access to primary care services. Cambridge University Press 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10304946/ /pubmed/37350326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.505 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Huxley, Peter
Krayer, Anne
Poole, Rob
Gromadzka, Alicja
Jie, Daniel Lai
Nafees, Sadia
The Goldberg–Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review
title The Goldberg–Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review
title_full The Goldberg–Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review
title_fullStr The Goldberg–Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The Goldberg–Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review
title_short The Goldberg–Huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review
title_sort goldberg–huxley model of the pathway to psychiatric care: 21st-century systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10304946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37350326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.505
work_keys_str_mv AT huxleypeter thegoldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview
AT krayeranne thegoldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview
AT poolerob thegoldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview
AT gromadzkaalicja thegoldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview
AT jiedaniellai thegoldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview
AT nafeessadia thegoldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview
AT huxleypeter goldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview
AT krayeranne goldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview
AT poolerob goldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview
AT gromadzkaalicja goldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview
AT jiedaniellai goldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview
AT nafeessadia goldberghuxleymodelofthepathwaytopsychiatriccare21stcenturysystematicreview