Cargando…

Micro-CT Evaluation of Microgaps at Implant–Abutment Connection

The assessment of microgaps at the implant–abutment interface is an important factor that may influence clinical success. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the size of microgaps between prefabricated and customised abutments (Astra Tech, Dentsply, York, PA, USA; Apollo Implants Components,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kowalski, Jakub, Puszkarz, Adam K., Radwanski, Mateusz, Sokolowski, Jerzy, Cichomski, Michal, Bourgi, Rim, Hardan, Louis, Sauro, Salvatore, Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10305145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37374674
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16124491
_version_ 1785065664261652480
author Kowalski, Jakub
Puszkarz, Adam K.
Radwanski, Mateusz
Sokolowski, Jerzy
Cichomski, Michal
Bourgi, Rim
Hardan, Louis
Sauro, Salvatore
Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
author_facet Kowalski, Jakub
Puszkarz, Adam K.
Radwanski, Mateusz
Sokolowski, Jerzy
Cichomski, Michal
Bourgi, Rim
Hardan, Louis
Sauro, Salvatore
Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
author_sort Kowalski, Jakub
collection PubMed
description The assessment of microgaps at the implant–abutment interface is an important factor that may influence clinical success. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the size of microgaps between prefabricated and customised abutments (Astra Tech, Dentsply, York, PA, USA; Apollo Implants Components, Pabianice, Poland) mounted on a standard implant. The measurement of the microgap was performed using micro-computed tomography (MCT). Due to 15-degree rotation of samples, 24 microsections were obtained. Scans were performed at four levels established at the interface between the abutment and the implant neck. Moreover, the volume of the microgap was evaluated. The size of the microgap at all measured levels varied from 0.1 to 3.7 µm for Astra and from 0.1 to 4.9 µm for Apollo (p > 0.05). Moreover, 90% of the Astra specimens and 70% of the Apollo specimens did not exhibit any microgaps. The highest mean values of microgap size for both groups were detected at the lowest portion of the abutment (p > 0.05). Additionally, the average microgap volume was greater for Apollo than for Astra (p > 0.05). It can be concluded that most samples did not exhibit any microgaps. Furthermore, the linear and volumetric dimensions of microgaps observed at the interface between Apollo or Astra abutments and Astra implants were comparable. Additionally, all tested components presented microgaps (if any) that were clinically acceptable. However, the microgap size of the Apollo abutment was higher and more variable than that of the Astra one.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10305145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103051452023-06-29 Micro-CT Evaluation of Microgaps at Implant–Abutment Connection Kowalski, Jakub Puszkarz, Adam K. Radwanski, Mateusz Sokolowski, Jerzy Cichomski, Michal Bourgi, Rim Hardan, Louis Sauro, Salvatore Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika Materials (Basel) Article The assessment of microgaps at the implant–abutment interface is an important factor that may influence clinical success. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the size of microgaps between prefabricated and customised abutments (Astra Tech, Dentsply, York, PA, USA; Apollo Implants Components, Pabianice, Poland) mounted on a standard implant. The measurement of the microgap was performed using micro-computed tomography (MCT). Due to 15-degree rotation of samples, 24 microsections were obtained. Scans were performed at four levels established at the interface between the abutment and the implant neck. Moreover, the volume of the microgap was evaluated. The size of the microgap at all measured levels varied from 0.1 to 3.7 µm for Astra and from 0.1 to 4.9 µm for Apollo (p > 0.05). Moreover, 90% of the Astra specimens and 70% of the Apollo specimens did not exhibit any microgaps. The highest mean values of microgap size for both groups were detected at the lowest portion of the abutment (p > 0.05). Additionally, the average microgap volume was greater for Apollo than for Astra (p > 0.05). It can be concluded that most samples did not exhibit any microgaps. Furthermore, the linear and volumetric dimensions of microgaps observed at the interface between Apollo or Astra abutments and Astra implants were comparable. Additionally, all tested components presented microgaps (if any) that were clinically acceptable. However, the microgap size of the Apollo abutment was higher and more variable than that of the Astra one. MDPI 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10305145/ /pubmed/37374674 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16124491 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kowalski, Jakub
Puszkarz, Adam K.
Radwanski, Mateusz
Sokolowski, Jerzy
Cichomski, Michal
Bourgi, Rim
Hardan, Louis
Sauro, Salvatore
Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
Micro-CT Evaluation of Microgaps at Implant–Abutment Connection
title Micro-CT Evaluation of Microgaps at Implant–Abutment Connection
title_full Micro-CT Evaluation of Microgaps at Implant–Abutment Connection
title_fullStr Micro-CT Evaluation of Microgaps at Implant–Abutment Connection
title_full_unstemmed Micro-CT Evaluation of Microgaps at Implant–Abutment Connection
title_short Micro-CT Evaluation of Microgaps at Implant–Abutment Connection
title_sort micro-ct evaluation of microgaps at implant–abutment connection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10305145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37374674
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16124491
work_keys_str_mv AT kowalskijakub microctevaluationofmicrogapsatimplantabutmentconnection
AT puszkarzadamk microctevaluationofmicrogapsatimplantabutmentconnection
AT radwanskimateusz microctevaluationofmicrogapsatimplantabutmentconnection
AT sokolowskijerzy microctevaluationofmicrogapsatimplantabutmentconnection
AT cichomskimichal microctevaluationofmicrogapsatimplantabutmentconnection
AT bourgirim microctevaluationofmicrogapsatimplantabutmentconnection
AT hardanlouis microctevaluationofmicrogapsatimplantabutmentconnection
AT saurosalvatore microctevaluationofmicrogapsatimplantabutmentconnection
AT lukomskaszymanskamonika microctevaluationofmicrogapsatimplantabutmentconnection