Cargando…

Comparing inpatient management of chronic pelvic pain flares before and after the COVID-19 pandemic

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] ABSTRACT: Patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) may experience pain exacerbations requiring hospital admissions. Due to the effects of backlogged elective surgeries and outpatient gynaecology appointments resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, we hypothesised t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuan, Kevin KW, Neilson, Aileen R, Horne, Andrew W, Whitaker, Lucy HR
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10305628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37186554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/RAF-23-0004
_version_ 1785065779376422912
author Kuan, Kevin KW
Neilson, Aileen R
Horne, Andrew W
Whitaker, Lucy HR
author_facet Kuan, Kevin KW
Neilson, Aileen R
Horne, Andrew W
Whitaker, Lucy HR
author_sort Kuan, Kevin KW
collection PubMed
description GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] ABSTRACT: Patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) may experience pain exacerbations requiring hospital admissions. Due to the effects of backlogged elective surgeries and outpatient gynaecology appointments resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, we hypothesised that there would be an increased number of women admitted with CPP flares. We conducted a retrospective review of all acute gynaecology admissions at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh from July to December 2018 (pre-COVID) and 2021 (post-COVID lockdown). We collected information on the proportion of emergency admissions due to CPP, inpatient investigations and subsequent management. Average total indicative hospital inpatient costs for women with CPP were calculated using NHS National Cost Collection data guidance. There was no significant difference in the number of emergency admissions due to pelvic pain before (153/507) and after (160/461) the COVID-19 pandemic. As high as 33 and 31% had a background history of CPP, respectively. Across both timepoints, investigations in women with CPP had low diagnostic yield: <25% had abnormal imaging findings and 0% had positive vaginal swab cultures. Women with CPP received significantly more inpatient morphine, pain team reviews and were more likely to be discharged with strong opioids. Total yearly inpatient costs were £170,104 and £179,156 in 2018 and 2021, respectively. Overall, emergency admission rates for managing CPP flares was similar before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Inpatient resource use for women with CPP remains high, investigations have low diagnostic yield and frequent instigation of opiates on discharge may risk dependence. Improved community care of CPP is needed to reduce emergency gynaecology resource utilisation. LAY SUMMARY: Existing treatments for chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and endometriosis focus on surgery or hormone medication, but these are often ineffective or associated with unacceptable side-effects. As a result, women continue to experience chronic pain and often have ‘flares’ of worsening pain that may lead to hospital admission. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in backlogged gynaecology clinics and surgeries. The aim of this study was to compare the management of emergency pelvic pain admissions for women with CPP before and after COVID-19. We also aimed to better understand their in-hospital management and estimate their hospital length of stay costs. We did not find an increase in CPP patients admitted for pelvic pain flares after the COVID-19 lockdown. Women with CPP often undergo multiple hospital tests and are often prescribed with strong pain medications which can cause long-term problems. Efforts are needed to improve long-term pain management for women with CPP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10305628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103056282023-06-29 Comparing inpatient management of chronic pelvic pain flares before and after the COVID-19 pandemic Kuan, Kevin KW Neilson, Aileen R Horne, Andrew W Whitaker, Lucy HR Reprod Fertil Research GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] ABSTRACT: Patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) may experience pain exacerbations requiring hospital admissions. Due to the effects of backlogged elective surgeries and outpatient gynaecology appointments resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, we hypothesised that there would be an increased number of women admitted with CPP flares. We conducted a retrospective review of all acute gynaecology admissions at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh from July to December 2018 (pre-COVID) and 2021 (post-COVID lockdown). We collected information on the proportion of emergency admissions due to CPP, inpatient investigations and subsequent management. Average total indicative hospital inpatient costs for women with CPP were calculated using NHS National Cost Collection data guidance. There was no significant difference in the number of emergency admissions due to pelvic pain before (153/507) and after (160/461) the COVID-19 pandemic. As high as 33 and 31% had a background history of CPP, respectively. Across both timepoints, investigations in women with CPP had low diagnostic yield: <25% had abnormal imaging findings and 0% had positive vaginal swab cultures. Women with CPP received significantly more inpatient morphine, pain team reviews and were more likely to be discharged with strong opioids. Total yearly inpatient costs were £170,104 and £179,156 in 2018 and 2021, respectively. Overall, emergency admission rates for managing CPP flares was similar before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Inpatient resource use for women with CPP remains high, investigations have low diagnostic yield and frequent instigation of opiates on discharge may risk dependence. Improved community care of CPP is needed to reduce emergency gynaecology resource utilisation. LAY SUMMARY: Existing treatments for chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and endometriosis focus on surgery or hormone medication, but these are often ineffective or associated with unacceptable side-effects. As a result, women continue to experience chronic pain and often have ‘flares’ of worsening pain that may lead to hospital admission. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in backlogged gynaecology clinics and surgeries. The aim of this study was to compare the management of emergency pelvic pain admissions for women with CPP before and after COVID-19. We also aimed to better understand their in-hospital management and estimate their hospital length of stay costs. We did not find an increase in CPP patients admitted for pelvic pain flares after the COVID-19 lockdown. Women with CPP often undergo multiple hospital tests and are often prescribed with strong pain medications which can cause long-term problems. Efforts are needed to improve long-term pain management for women with CPP. Bioscientifica Ltd 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10305628/ /pubmed/37186554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/RAF-23-0004 Text en © the author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research
Kuan, Kevin KW
Neilson, Aileen R
Horne, Andrew W
Whitaker, Lucy HR
Comparing inpatient management of chronic pelvic pain flares before and after the COVID-19 pandemic
title Comparing inpatient management of chronic pelvic pain flares before and after the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Comparing inpatient management of chronic pelvic pain flares before and after the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Comparing inpatient management of chronic pelvic pain flares before and after the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Comparing inpatient management of chronic pelvic pain flares before and after the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Comparing inpatient management of chronic pelvic pain flares before and after the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort comparing inpatient management of chronic pelvic pain flares before and after the covid-19 pandemic
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10305628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37186554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/RAF-23-0004
work_keys_str_mv AT kuankevinkw comparinginpatientmanagementofchronicpelvicpainflaresbeforeandafterthecovid19pandemic
AT neilsonaileenr comparinginpatientmanagementofchronicpelvicpainflaresbeforeandafterthecovid19pandemic
AT horneandreww comparinginpatientmanagementofchronicpelvicpainflaresbeforeandafterthecovid19pandemic
AT whitakerlucyhr comparinginpatientmanagementofchronicpelvicpainflaresbeforeandafterthecovid19pandemic