Cargando…

Prone Vs. Supine Position Ventilation in Intubated COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Whether prone positioning of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 pneumonia has benefits over supine positioning is not clear. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine whether prone versus supine positioning during ventilation resulted in different outcomes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fayed, Mohamed, Maroun, Wissam, Elnahla, Ahmed, Yeldo, Nicholas, Was, Jessica R, Penning, Donald H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10305786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388580
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39636
_version_ 1785065813163638784
author Fayed, Mohamed
Maroun, Wissam
Elnahla, Ahmed
Yeldo, Nicholas
Was, Jessica R
Penning, Donald H
author_facet Fayed, Mohamed
Maroun, Wissam
Elnahla, Ahmed
Yeldo, Nicholas
Was, Jessica R
Penning, Donald H
author_sort Fayed, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description Whether prone positioning of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 pneumonia has benefits over supine positioning is not clear. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine whether prone versus supine positioning during ventilation resulted in different outcomes for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, and Web of Science for prospective and retrospective studies up through April 2023. We included studies that compared outcomes of patients with COVID-19 after ventilation in prone and supine positions. The primary outcomes were three mortality measures: hospital, overall, and intensive care unit (ICU). Secondary outcomes were mechanical ventilation days, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and hospital length of stay. We conducted risk of bias analysis and used meta-analysis software to analyze results. Mean difference (MD) was used for continuous data, and odds ratio (OR) was used for dichotomous data, both with 95% CIs. Significant heterogeneity (I(2)) was considered if I(2) was >50%. A statistically significant result was considered if the p-value was <0.05. Of 1787 articles identified, 93 were retrieved, and seven retrospective cohort studies encompassing 5216 patients with COVID-19 were analyzed. ICU mortality was significantly higher in the prone group (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.43-3.43; p=0.0004). No statistically significant difference was observed between prone and supine groups for hospital mortality (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.66-1.37; p=0.78) or overall mortality (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.72-1.64; p=0.71). Studies that analyzed primary outcomes had significant heterogeneity. Hospital length of stay was significantly higher in the prone than in the supine group (MD, 6.06; 95 % CI, 3.15-8.97; p<0.0001). ICU length of stay and days of mechanical ventilation did not differ between the two groups. In conclusion, mechanical ventilation with prone positioning for all patients with COVID-19 pneumonia may not provide a mortality benefit over supine positioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10305786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103057862023-06-29 Prone Vs. Supine Position Ventilation in Intubated COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Fayed, Mohamed Maroun, Wissam Elnahla, Ahmed Yeldo, Nicholas Was, Jessica R Penning, Donald H Cureus Anesthesiology Whether prone positioning of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for COVID-19 pneumonia has benefits over supine positioning is not clear. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine whether prone versus supine positioning during ventilation resulted in different outcomes for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, and Web of Science for prospective and retrospective studies up through April 2023. We included studies that compared outcomes of patients with COVID-19 after ventilation in prone and supine positions. The primary outcomes were three mortality measures: hospital, overall, and intensive care unit (ICU). Secondary outcomes were mechanical ventilation days, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and hospital length of stay. We conducted risk of bias analysis and used meta-analysis software to analyze results. Mean difference (MD) was used for continuous data, and odds ratio (OR) was used for dichotomous data, both with 95% CIs. Significant heterogeneity (I(2)) was considered if I(2) was >50%. A statistically significant result was considered if the p-value was <0.05. Of 1787 articles identified, 93 were retrieved, and seven retrospective cohort studies encompassing 5216 patients with COVID-19 were analyzed. ICU mortality was significantly higher in the prone group (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.43-3.43; p=0.0004). No statistically significant difference was observed between prone and supine groups for hospital mortality (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.66-1.37; p=0.78) or overall mortality (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.72-1.64; p=0.71). Studies that analyzed primary outcomes had significant heterogeneity. Hospital length of stay was significantly higher in the prone than in the supine group (MD, 6.06; 95 % CI, 3.15-8.97; p<0.0001). ICU length of stay and days of mechanical ventilation did not differ between the two groups. In conclusion, mechanical ventilation with prone positioning for all patients with COVID-19 pneumonia may not provide a mortality benefit over supine positioning. Cureus 2023-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10305786/ /pubmed/37388580 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39636 Text en Copyright © 2023, Fayed et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Fayed, Mohamed
Maroun, Wissam
Elnahla, Ahmed
Yeldo, Nicholas
Was, Jessica R
Penning, Donald H
Prone Vs. Supine Position Ventilation in Intubated COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Prone Vs. Supine Position Ventilation in Intubated COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Prone Vs. Supine Position Ventilation in Intubated COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Prone Vs. Supine Position Ventilation in Intubated COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prone Vs. Supine Position Ventilation in Intubated COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Prone Vs. Supine Position Ventilation in Intubated COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort prone vs. supine position ventilation in intubated covid-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10305786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37388580
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39636
work_keys_str_mv AT fayedmohamed pronevssupinepositionventilationinintubatedcovid19patientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marounwissam pronevssupinepositionventilationinintubatedcovid19patientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT elnahlaahmed pronevssupinepositionventilationinintubatedcovid19patientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yeldonicholas pronevssupinepositionventilationinintubatedcovid19patientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wasjessicar pronevssupinepositionventilationinintubatedcovid19patientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT penningdonaldh pronevssupinepositionventilationinintubatedcovid19patientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis