Cargando…

Hypertension control rate in India: systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level non-interventional studies, 2001–2022

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a significant contributor to mortality in India. Achieving better hypertension control rate at the population level is critical in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Hypertension control rate was defined as the proportion of patients with their bloo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koya, Shaffi Fazaludeen, Pilakkadavath, Zarin, Chandran, Praseeda, Wilson, Tom, Kuriakose, Serin, Akbar, Suni K., Ali, Althaf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10305851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37383035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2022.100113
_version_ 1785065821972725760
author Koya, Shaffi Fazaludeen
Pilakkadavath, Zarin
Chandran, Praseeda
Wilson, Tom
Kuriakose, Serin
Akbar, Suni K.
Ali, Althaf
author_facet Koya, Shaffi Fazaludeen
Pilakkadavath, Zarin
Chandran, Praseeda
Wilson, Tom
Kuriakose, Serin
Akbar, Suni K.
Ali, Althaf
author_sort Koya, Shaffi Fazaludeen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a significant contributor to mortality in India. Achieving better hypertension control rate at the population level is critical in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Hypertension control rate was defined as the proportion of patients with their blood pressure under control (systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based, non-interventional studies published after 2001 that reported hypertension control rates. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, and grey literature, and extracted data using a common framework, and summarized the study characteristics. We conducted random-effects meta-analysis using untransformed hypertension control rates and reported the overall summary estimates and subgroup estimates of control rates as percentages and 95% confidence intervals. We also conducted mixed-effects meta-regression with sex, region, and study period as covariates. The risk of bias was assessed, and level of evidence was summarized using SIGN-50 methodology. The protocol was pre-registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021267973. FINDINGS: The systematic review included 51 studies (n = 338,313 hypertensive patients). 21 studies (41%) reported poorer control rates among males than females, and six studies (12%) reported poorer control rates among rural patients. The pooled hypertension control rate in India during 2001–2020 was 17.5% (95% CI: 14.3%–20.6%)—with significant increase over the years, reaching 22.5% (CI: 16.9–28.0%) in 2016–2020. Sub-group analysis showed significantly better control rates in the South and West regions, and significantly poorer control rates among males. Very few studies reported data on social determinants or lifestyle risk factors. INTERPRETATION: Less than one-fourth of hypertensive patients in India had their blood pressure under control during 2016–2020. Although the control rate has improved compared to previous years, substantial differences exist across regions. Very few studies have examined the lifestyle risk factors and social determinants relevant to hypertension control in India. The country needs to develop and evaluate sustainable, community-based strategies and programs to improve hypertension control rates. FUNDING: Not applicable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10305851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103058512023-06-28 Hypertension control rate in India: systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level non-interventional studies, 2001–2022 Koya, Shaffi Fazaludeen Pilakkadavath, Zarin Chandran, Praseeda Wilson, Tom Kuriakose, Serin Akbar, Suni K. Ali, Althaf Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia Articles BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a significant contributor to mortality in India. Achieving better hypertension control rate at the population level is critical in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Hypertension control rate was defined as the proportion of patients with their blood pressure under control (systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based, non-interventional studies published after 2001 that reported hypertension control rates. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, and grey literature, and extracted data using a common framework, and summarized the study characteristics. We conducted random-effects meta-analysis using untransformed hypertension control rates and reported the overall summary estimates and subgroup estimates of control rates as percentages and 95% confidence intervals. We also conducted mixed-effects meta-regression with sex, region, and study period as covariates. The risk of bias was assessed, and level of evidence was summarized using SIGN-50 methodology. The protocol was pre-registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021267973. FINDINGS: The systematic review included 51 studies (n = 338,313 hypertensive patients). 21 studies (41%) reported poorer control rates among males than females, and six studies (12%) reported poorer control rates among rural patients. The pooled hypertension control rate in India during 2001–2020 was 17.5% (95% CI: 14.3%–20.6%)—with significant increase over the years, reaching 22.5% (CI: 16.9–28.0%) in 2016–2020. Sub-group analysis showed significantly better control rates in the South and West regions, and significantly poorer control rates among males. Very few studies reported data on social determinants or lifestyle risk factors. INTERPRETATION: Less than one-fourth of hypertensive patients in India had their blood pressure under control during 2016–2020. Although the control rate has improved compared to previous years, substantial differences exist across regions. Very few studies have examined the lifestyle risk factors and social determinants relevant to hypertension control in India. The country needs to develop and evaluate sustainable, community-based strategies and programs to improve hypertension control rates. FUNDING: Not applicable. Elsevier 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10305851/ /pubmed/37383035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2022.100113 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Koya, Shaffi Fazaludeen
Pilakkadavath, Zarin
Chandran, Praseeda
Wilson, Tom
Kuriakose, Serin
Akbar, Suni K.
Ali, Althaf
Hypertension control rate in India: systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level non-interventional studies, 2001–2022
title Hypertension control rate in India: systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level non-interventional studies, 2001–2022
title_full Hypertension control rate in India: systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level non-interventional studies, 2001–2022
title_fullStr Hypertension control rate in India: systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level non-interventional studies, 2001–2022
title_full_unstemmed Hypertension control rate in India: systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level non-interventional studies, 2001–2022
title_short Hypertension control rate in India: systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level non-interventional studies, 2001–2022
title_sort hypertension control rate in india: systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level non-interventional studies, 2001–2022
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10305851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37383035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2022.100113
work_keys_str_mv AT koyashaffifazaludeen hypertensioncontrolrateinindiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpopulationlevelnoninterventionalstudies20012022
AT pilakkadavathzarin hypertensioncontrolrateinindiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpopulationlevelnoninterventionalstudies20012022
AT chandranpraseeda hypertensioncontrolrateinindiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpopulationlevelnoninterventionalstudies20012022
AT wilsontom hypertensioncontrolrateinindiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpopulationlevelnoninterventionalstudies20012022
AT kuriakoseserin hypertensioncontrolrateinindiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpopulationlevelnoninterventionalstudies20012022
AT akbarsunik hypertensioncontrolrateinindiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpopulationlevelnoninterventionalstudies20012022
AT alialthaf hypertensioncontrolrateinindiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpopulationlevelnoninterventionalstudies20012022