Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India

BACKGROUND: Over the years, there has been introduction of newer drugs, like bendamustine and ibrutinib, for the management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Though these drugs lead to better survival, they are also associated with higher cost. The existing evidence on cost effectiveness of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nehra, Prerika, Chauhan, Akashdeep Singh, Malhotra, Pankaj, Kumar, Lalit, Singh, Ashish, Gupta, Nidhi, Mehra, Nikita, Mathew, Anisha, Kataki, Amal Chandra, Gupta, Sudeep, Prinja, Shankar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10305972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37383548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100201
_version_ 1785065844250771456
author Nehra, Prerika
Chauhan, Akashdeep Singh
Malhotra, Pankaj
Kumar, Lalit
Singh, Ashish
Gupta, Nidhi
Mehra, Nikita
Mathew, Anisha
Kataki, Amal Chandra
Gupta, Sudeep
Prinja, Shankar
author_facet Nehra, Prerika
Chauhan, Akashdeep Singh
Malhotra, Pankaj
Kumar, Lalit
Singh, Ashish
Gupta, Nidhi
Mehra, Nikita
Mathew, Anisha
Kataki, Amal Chandra
Gupta, Sudeep
Prinja, Shankar
author_sort Nehra, Prerika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the years, there has been introduction of newer drugs, like bendamustine and ibrutinib, for the management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Though these drugs lead to better survival, they are also associated with higher cost. The existing evidence on cost effectiveness of these drugs is from high-income countries, which has limited generalisability for low-income and middle-income counties. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to assess the cost-effectiveness of three therapeutic regimens, chlorambucil plus prednisolone (CP), bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) and ibrutinib for CLL treatment in India. METHODS: A Markov model was developed for estimating lifetime costs and consequences in a hypothetical cohort of 1000 CLL patients following treatment with different therapeutic regimens. The analysis was performed based on a limited societal perspective, 3% discount rate and lifetime horizon. The clinical effectiveness of each regime in the form of progression-free survival and occurrence of adverse events were assessed from various randomised controlled trials. A structured comprehensive review of literature was undertaken for the identification of relevant trials. The data on utility values and out of pocket expenditure was obtained from primary data collected from 242 CLL patients across six large cancer hospitals in India. FINDINGS: As compared to the most affordable regimen comprising of CP as first-line followed by BR as second-line therapy, none of the other therapeutic regimens were cost-effective at one time per capita gross-domestic product of India. However, if the current price of either combination of BR and ibrutinib or even ibrutinib alone could be reduced by more than 80%, regimen comprising of BR as first-line therapy followed by second-line ibrutinib would become cost-effective. INTERPRETATION: At the current market prices, regimen comprising of CP as first-line followed by BR as second-line therapy is the most cost-effective strategy for CLL treatment in India. FUNDING: Department of Health Research, Government of India.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10305972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103059722023-06-28 Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India Nehra, Prerika Chauhan, Akashdeep Singh Malhotra, Pankaj Kumar, Lalit Singh, Ashish Gupta, Nidhi Mehra, Nikita Mathew, Anisha Kataki, Amal Chandra Gupta, Sudeep Prinja, Shankar Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia Articles BACKGROUND: Over the years, there has been introduction of newer drugs, like bendamustine and ibrutinib, for the management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Though these drugs lead to better survival, they are also associated with higher cost. The existing evidence on cost effectiveness of these drugs is from high-income countries, which has limited generalisability for low-income and middle-income counties. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to assess the cost-effectiveness of three therapeutic regimens, chlorambucil plus prednisolone (CP), bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) and ibrutinib for CLL treatment in India. METHODS: A Markov model was developed for estimating lifetime costs and consequences in a hypothetical cohort of 1000 CLL patients following treatment with different therapeutic regimens. The analysis was performed based on a limited societal perspective, 3% discount rate and lifetime horizon. The clinical effectiveness of each regime in the form of progression-free survival and occurrence of adverse events were assessed from various randomised controlled trials. A structured comprehensive review of literature was undertaken for the identification of relevant trials. The data on utility values and out of pocket expenditure was obtained from primary data collected from 242 CLL patients across six large cancer hospitals in India. FINDINGS: As compared to the most affordable regimen comprising of CP as first-line followed by BR as second-line therapy, none of the other therapeutic regimens were cost-effective at one time per capita gross-domestic product of India. However, if the current price of either combination of BR and ibrutinib or even ibrutinib alone could be reduced by more than 80%, regimen comprising of BR as first-line therapy followed by second-line ibrutinib would become cost-effective. INTERPRETATION: At the current market prices, regimen comprising of CP as first-line followed by BR as second-line therapy is the most cost-effective strategy for CLL treatment in India. FUNDING: Department of Health Research, Government of India. Elsevier 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10305972/ /pubmed/37383548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100201 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Nehra, Prerika
Chauhan, Akashdeep Singh
Malhotra, Pankaj
Kumar, Lalit
Singh, Ashish
Gupta, Nidhi
Mehra, Nikita
Mathew, Anisha
Kataki, Amal Chandra
Gupta, Sudeep
Prinja, Shankar
Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in india
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10305972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37383548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100201
work_keys_str_mv AT nehraprerika costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia
AT chauhanakashdeepsingh costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia
AT malhotrapankaj costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia
AT kumarlalit costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia
AT singhashish costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia
AT guptanidhi costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia
AT mehranikita costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia
AT mathewanisha costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia
AT katakiamalchandra costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia
AT guptasudeep costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia
AT prinjashankar costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia