Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India
BACKGROUND: Over the years, there has been introduction of newer drugs, like bendamustine and ibrutinib, for the management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Though these drugs lead to better survival, they are also associated with higher cost. The existing evidence on cost effectiveness of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10305972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37383548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100201 |
_version_ | 1785065844250771456 |
---|---|
author | Nehra, Prerika Chauhan, Akashdeep Singh Malhotra, Pankaj Kumar, Lalit Singh, Ashish Gupta, Nidhi Mehra, Nikita Mathew, Anisha Kataki, Amal Chandra Gupta, Sudeep Prinja, Shankar |
author_facet | Nehra, Prerika Chauhan, Akashdeep Singh Malhotra, Pankaj Kumar, Lalit Singh, Ashish Gupta, Nidhi Mehra, Nikita Mathew, Anisha Kataki, Amal Chandra Gupta, Sudeep Prinja, Shankar |
author_sort | Nehra, Prerika |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Over the years, there has been introduction of newer drugs, like bendamustine and ibrutinib, for the management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Though these drugs lead to better survival, they are also associated with higher cost. The existing evidence on cost effectiveness of these drugs is from high-income countries, which has limited generalisability for low-income and middle-income counties. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to assess the cost-effectiveness of three therapeutic regimens, chlorambucil plus prednisolone (CP), bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) and ibrutinib for CLL treatment in India. METHODS: A Markov model was developed for estimating lifetime costs and consequences in a hypothetical cohort of 1000 CLL patients following treatment with different therapeutic regimens. The analysis was performed based on a limited societal perspective, 3% discount rate and lifetime horizon. The clinical effectiveness of each regime in the form of progression-free survival and occurrence of adverse events were assessed from various randomised controlled trials. A structured comprehensive review of literature was undertaken for the identification of relevant trials. The data on utility values and out of pocket expenditure was obtained from primary data collected from 242 CLL patients across six large cancer hospitals in India. FINDINGS: As compared to the most affordable regimen comprising of CP as first-line followed by BR as second-line therapy, none of the other therapeutic regimens were cost-effective at one time per capita gross-domestic product of India. However, if the current price of either combination of BR and ibrutinib or even ibrutinib alone could be reduced by more than 80%, regimen comprising of BR as first-line therapy followed by second-line ibrutinib would become cost-effective. INTERPRETATION: At the current market prices, regimen comprising of CP as first-line followed by BR as second-line therapy is the most cost-effective strategy for CLL treatment in India. FUNDING: Department of Health Research, Government of India. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10305972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103059722023-06-28 Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India Nehra, Prerika Chauhan, Akashdeep Singh Malhotra, Pankaj Kumar, Lalit Singh, Ashish Gupta, Nidhi Mehra, Nikita Mathew, Anisha Kataki, Amal Chandra Gupta, Sudeep Prinja, Shankar Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia Articles BACKGROUND: Over the years, there has been introduction of newer drugs, like bendamustine and ibrutinib, for the management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Though these drugs lead to better survival, they are also associated with higher cost. The existing evidence on cost effectiveness of these drugs is from high-income countries, which has limited generalisability for low-income and middle-income counties. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to assess the cost-effectiveness of three therapeutic regimens, chlorambucil plus prednisolone (CP), bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) and ibrutinib for CLL treatment in India. METHODS: A Markov model was developed for estimating lifetime costs and consequences in a hypothetical cohort of 1000 CLL patients following treatment with different therapeutic regimens. The analysis was performed based on a limited societal perspective, 3% discount rate and lifetime horizon. The clinical effectiveness of each regime in the form of progression-free survival and occurrence of adverse events were assessed from various randomised controlled trials. A structured comprehensive review of literature was undertaken for the identification of relevant trials. The data on utility values and out of pocket expenditure was obtained from primary data collected from 242 CLL patients across six large cancer hospitals in India. FINDINGS: As compared to the most affordable regimen comprising of CP as first-line followed by BR as second-line therapy, none of the other therapeutic regimens were cost-effective at one time per capita gross-domestic product of India. However, if the current price of either combination of BR and ibrutinib or even ibrutinib alone could be reduced by more than 80%, regimen comprising of BR as first-line therapy followed by second-line ibrutinib would become cost-effective. INTERPRETATION: At the current market prices, regimen comprising of CP as first-line followed by BR as second-line therapy is the most cost-effective strategy for CLL treatment in India. FUNDING: Department of Health Research, Government of India. Elsevier 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10305972/ /pubmed/37383548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100201 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Nehra, Prerika Chauhan, Akashdeep Singh Malhotra, Pankaj Kumar, Lalit Singh, Ashish Gupta, Nidhi Mehra, Nikita Mathew, Anisha Kataki, Amal Chandra Gupta, Sudeep Prinja, Shankar Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India |
title | Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in India |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of different combination therapies for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in india |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10305972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37383548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100201 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nehraprerika costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia AT chauhanakashdeepsingh costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia AT malhotrapankaj costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia AT kumarlalit costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia AT singhashish costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia AT guptanidhi costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia AT mehranikita costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia AT mathewanisha costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia AT katakiamalchandra costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia AT guptasudeep costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia AT prinjashankar costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferentcombinationtherapiesforthetreatmentofchroniclymphocyticleukaemiainindia |