Cargando…
Evaluating the status of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery indicators for India
For universal surgical, obstetric, trauma, and anesthesia care by 2030, the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (LCoGS) suggested tracking six indicators. We reviewed academic and policy literature to investigate the current state of LCoGS indicators in India. There was limited primary data for acce...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10306037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37383563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100178 |
_version_ | 1785065855254528000 |
---|---|
author | Zadey, Siddhesh Iyer, Himanshu Nayan, Anveshi Shetty, Ritika Sonal, Swati Smith, Emily R. Staton, Catherine A. Fitzgerald, Tamara N. Nickenig Vissoci, Joao Ricardo |
author_facet | Zadey, Siddhesh Iyer, Himanshu Nayan, Anveshi Shetty, Ritika Sonal, Swati Smith, Emily R. Staton, Catherine A. Fitzgerald, Tamara N. Nickenig Vissoci, Joao Ricardo |
author_sort | Zadey, Siddhesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | For universal surgical, obstetric, trauma, and anesthesia care by 2030, the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (LCoGS) suggested tracking six indicators. We reviewed academic and policy literature to investigate the current state of LCoGS indicators in India. There was limited primary data for access to timely essential surgery, risk of impoverishing and catastrophic health expenditures due to surgery, though some modeled estimates are present. Surgical specialist workforce estimates are heterogeneous across different levels of care, urban and rural areas, and diverse health sectors. Surgical volumes differ widely across demographic, socio-economic, and geographic cohorts. Perioperative mortality rates vary across procedures, diagnoses, and follow-up time periods. Available data suggest India falls short of achieving global targets. This review highlights the evidence gap for India's surgical care planning. India needs a systematic subnational mapping of indicators and adaptation of targets as per the country's health needs for equitable and sustainable planning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10306037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103060372023-06-28 Evaluating the status of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery indicators for India Zadey, Siddhesh Iyer, Himanshu Nayan, Anveshi Shetty, Ritika Sonal, Swati Smith, Emily R. Staton, Catherine A. Fitzgerald, Tamara N. Nickenig Vissoci, Joao Ricardo Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia Review For universal surgical, obstetric, trauma, and anesthesia care by 2030, the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (LCoGS) suggested tracking six indicators. We reviewed academic and policy literature to investigate the current state of LCoGS indicators in India. There was limited primary data for access to timely essential surgery, risk of impoverishing and catastrophic health expenditures due to surgery, though some modeled estimates are present. Surgical specialist workforce estimates are heterogeneous across different levels of care, urban and rural areas, and diverse health sectors. Surgical volumes differ widely across demographic, socio-economic, and geographic cohorts. Perioperative mortality rates vary across procedures, diagnoses, and follow-up time periods. Available data suggest India falls short of achieving global targets. This review highlights the evidence gap for India's surgical care planning. India needs a systematic subnational mapping of indicators and adaptation of targets as per the country's health needs for equitable and sustainable planning. Elsevier 2023-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10306037/ /pubmed/37383563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100178 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Zadey, Siddhesh Iyer, Himanshu Nayan, Anveshi Shetty, Ritika Sonal, Swati Smith, Emily R. Staton, Catherine A. Fitzgerald, Tamara N. Nickenig Vissoci, Joao Ricardo Evaluating the status of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery indicators for India |
title | Evaluating the status of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery indicators for India |
title_full | Evaluating the status of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery indicators for India |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the status of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery indicators for India |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the status of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery indicators for India |
title_short | Evaluating the status of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery indicators for India |
title_sort | evaluating the status of the lancet commission on global surgery indicators for india |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10306037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37383563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100178 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zadeysiddhesh evaluatingthestatusofthelancetcommissiononglobalsurgeryindicatorsforindia AT iyerhimanshu evaluatingthestatusofthelancetcommissiononglobalsurgeryindicatorsforindia AT nayananveshi evaluatingthestatusofthelancetcommissiononglobalsurgeryindicatorsforindia AT shettyritika evaluatingthestatusofthelancetcommissiononglobalsurgeryindicatorsforindia AT sonalswati evaluatingthestatusofthelancetcommissiononglobalsurgeryindicatorsforindia AT smithemilyr evaluatingthestatusofthelancetcommissiononglobalsurgeryindicatorsforindia AT statoncatherinea evaluatingthestatusofthelancetcommissiononglobalsurgeryindicatorsforindia AT fitzgeraldtamaran evaluatingthestatusofthelancetcommissiononglobalsurgeryindicatorsforindia AT nickenigvissocijoaoricardo evaluatingthestatusofthelancetcommissiononglobalsurgeryindicatorsforindia |