Cargando…
Response surface methodology application on lubricant oil degradation, performance, and emissions in SI engine: A novel optimization of alcoholic fuel blends
For evaluating the significance of renewable alternative fuels for optimized engine performance and lower emissions, methanol has been extensively utilized as a blend with gasoline in spark-ignition engines. However, rare attempts have been rendered to examine the consequence of methanol–gasoline fu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10306155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36617880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504221148342 |
_version_ | 1785065878246653952 |
---|---|
author | Ijaz Malik, Muhammad Ali Usman, Muhammad Akhtar, Maaz Farooq, Muhammad Saleem Iqbal, Hafiz Muhammad Irshad, Muneeb Shah, Muhammad Haris |
author_facet | Ijaz Malik, Muhammad Ali Usman, Muhammad Akhtar, Maaz Farooq, Muhammad Saleem Iqbal, Hafiz Muhammad Irshad, Muneeb Shah, Muhammad Haris |
author_sort | Ijaz Malik, Muhammad Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | For evaluating the significance of renewable alternative fuels for optimized engine performance and lower emissions, methanol has been extensively utilized as a blend with gasoline in spark-ignition engines. However, rare attempts have been rendered to examine the consequence of methanol–gasoline fuel blends (M6, M12, and M18) on lubricant oil operating for a longer period in engines. The highest and least decrease of 9.62% and 6.68% in kinematic viscosity (KV) was observed for M0 and M18, respectively. However, the flash point (FP) of degraded lubricant oil for M6, M12, and M18 was 3%, 5%, and 7% higher than that of M0, respectively. Total acid number (TAN) and ash content of degraded lubricant oil for M18 were the highest among M0, M6, and M12. An inclusive optimization of engine performance, emissions, and lubricant oil properties has been made for various methanol–gasoline fuel blends at distinct operating conditions by employing the response surface methodology (RSM) technique. RSM-based optimization portrayed the composite desirability value of 0.73 for 2137.13 watt brake power (BP), 6.08 N-m torque, 0.37 kg/kwh brake-specific fuel consumption, 22.10% brake thermal efficiency, 4.02% carbon monoxide emission, 7.15% carbon dioxide emission, 134.12 ppm hydrocarbon emission, 517.02 ppm nitrogen oxides emission, 12.44 cst KV, 203.77°C FP, 2.23 mg/g KOH TAN, and 2.65%wt ash content as responses for fuel blend M8 at 3400 rpm and higher loading condition. RSM predicted results demonstrated significant compliance with empirical findings, with absolute percentage error (APE) below 5% for each response. However, the highest APE of 4.68% was obtained for FP owing to inefficient desirability as a consequence of manual testing. The least APE of 1.57% was obtained for torque because of the highest desirability. Overall, the RSM predicted results of the designed models are effective and viable. RSM technique was found to be effective for the optimization of the broader engine characteristics spectrum. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10306155 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103061552023-08-09 Response surface methodology application on lubricant oil degradation, performance, and emissions in SI engine: A novel optimization of alcoholic fuel blends Ijaz Malik, Muhammad Ali Usman, Muhammad Akhtar, Maaz Farooq, Muhammad Saleem Iqbal, Hafiz Muhammad Irshad, Muneeb Shah, Muhammad Haris Sci Prog Original Article For evaluating the significance of renewable alternative fuels for optimized engine performance and lower emissions, methanol has been extensively utilized as a blend with gasoline in spark-ignition engines. However, rare attempts have been rendered to examine the consequence of methanol–gasoline fuel blends (M6, M12, and M18) on lubricant oil operating for a longer period in engines. The highest and least decrease of 9.62% and 6.68% in kinematic viscosity (KV) was observed for M0 and M18, respectively. However, the flash point (FP) of degraded lubricant oil for M6, M12, and M18 was 3%, 5%, and 7% higher than that of M0, respectively. Total acid number (TAN) and ash content of degraded lubricant oil for M18 were the highest among M0, M6, and M12. An inclusive optimization of engine performance, emissions, and lubricant oil properties has been made for various methanol–gasoline fuel blends at distinct operating conditions by employing the response surface methodology (RSM) technique. RSM-based optimization portrayed the composite desirability value of 0.73 for 2137.13 watt brake power (BP), 6.08 N-m torque, 0.37 kg/kwh brake-specific fuel consumption, 22.10% brake thermal efficiency, 4.02% carbon monoxide emission, 7.15% carbon dioxide emission, 134.12 ppm hydrocarbon emission, 517.02 ppm nitrogen oxides emission, 12.44 cst KV, 203.77°C FP, 2.23 mg/g KOH TAN, and 2.65%wt ash content as responses for fuel blend M8 at 3400 rpm and higher loading condition. RSM predicted results demonstrated significant compliance with empirical findings, with absolute percentage error (APE) below 5% for each response. However, the highest APE of 4.68% was obtained for FP owing to inefficient desirability as a consequence of manual testing. The least APE of 1.57% was obtained for torque because of the highest desirability. Overall, the RSM predicted results of the designed models are effective and viable. RSM technique was found to be effective for the optimization of the broader engine characteristics spectrum. SAGE Publications 2023-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10306155/ /pubmed/36617880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504221148342 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ijaz Malik, Muhammad Ali Usman, Muhammad Akhtar, Maaz Farooq, Muhammad Saleem Iqbal, Hafiz Muhammad Irshad, Muneeb Shah, Muhammad Haris Response surface methodology application on lubricant oil degradation, performance, and emissions in SI engine: A novel optimization of alcoholic fuel blends |
title | Response surface methodology application on lubricant oil degradation, performance,
and emissions in SI engine: A novel optimization of alcoholic fuel blends |
title_full | Response surface methodology application on lubricant oil degradation, performance,
and emissions in SI engine: A novel optimization of alcoholic fuel blends |
title_fullStr | Response surface methodology application on lubricant oil degradation, performance,
and emissions in SI engine: A novel optimization of alcoholic fuel blends |
title_full_unstemmed | Response surface methodology application on lubricant oil degradation, performance,
and emissions in SI engine: A novel optimization of alcoholic fuel blends |
title_short | Response surface methodology application on lubricant oil degradation, performance,
and emissions in SI engine: A novel optimization of alcoholic fuel blends |
title_sort | response surface methodology application on lubricant oil degradation, performance,
and emissions in si engine: a novel optimization of alcoholic fuel blends |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10306155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36617880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504221148342 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ijazmalikmuhammadali responsesurfacemethodologyapplicationonlubricantoildegradationperformanceandemissionsinsiengineanoveloptimizationofalcoholicfuelblends AT usmanmuhammad responsesurfacemethodologyapplicationonlubricantoildegradationperformanceandemissionsinsiengineanoveloptimizationofalcoholicfuelblends AT akhtarmaaz responsesurfacemethodologyapplicationonlubricantoildegradationperformanceandemissionsinsiengineanoveloptimizationofalcoholicfuelblends AT farooqmuhammad responsesurfacemethodologyapplicationonlubricantoildegradationperformanceandemissionsinsiengineanoveloptimizationofalcoholicfuelblends AT saleemiqbalhafizmuhammad responsesurfacemethodologyapplicationonlubricantoildegradationperformanceandemissionsinsiengineanoveloptimizationofalcoholicfuelblends AT irshadmuneeb responsesurfacemethodologyapplicationonlubricantoildegradationperformanceandemissionsinsiengineanoveloptimizationofalcoholicfuelblends AT shahmuhammadharis responsesurfacemethodologyapplicationonlubricantoildegradationperformanceandemissionsinsiengineanoveloptimizationofalcoholicfuelblends |