Cargando…
Machine learning in predicting outcomes for stroke patients following rehabilitation treatment: A systematic review
OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to summarize the use of machine learning for predicting the potential benefits of stroke rehabilitation treatments, to evaluate the risk of bias of predictive models, and to provide recommendations for future models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was cond...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10306189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37379289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287308 |
_version_ | 1785065884562227200 |
---|---|
author | Zu, Wanting Huang, Xuemiao Xu, Tianxin Du, Lin Wang, Yiming Wang, Lisheng Nie, Wenbo |
author_facet | Zu, Wanting Huang, Xuemiao Xu, Tianxin Du, Lin Wang, Yiming Wang, Lisheng Nie, Wenbo |
author_sort | Zu, Wanting |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to summarize the use of machine learning for predicting the potential benefits of stroke rehabilitation treatments, to evaluate the risk of bias of predictive models, and to provide recommendations for future models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement and the CHARMS checklist. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and CNKI databases were searched up to April 08, 2023. The PROBAST tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included models. RESULTS: Ten studies within 32 models met our inclusion criteria. The optimal AUC value of the included models ranged from 0.63 to 0.91, and the optimal R(2) value ranged from 0.64 to 0.91. All of the included models were rated as having a high or unclear risk of bias, and most of them were downgraded due to inappropriate data sources or analysis processes. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: There remains much room for improvement in future modeling studies, such as high-quality data sources and model analysis. Reliable predictive models should be developed to improve the efficacy of rehabilitation treatment by clinicians. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10306189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103061892023-06-29 Machine learning in predicting outcomes for stroke patients following rehabilitation treatment: A systematic review Zu, Wanting Huang, Xuemiao Xu, Tianxin Du, Lin Wang, Yiming Wang, Lisheng Nie, Wenbo PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to summarize the use of machine learning for predicting the potential benefits of stroke rehabilitation treatments, to evaluate the risk of bias of predictive models, and to provide recommendations for future models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement and the CHARMS checklist. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and CNKI databases were searched up to April 08, 2023. The PROBAST tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included models. RESULTS: Ten studies within 32 models met our inclusion criteria. The optimal AUC value of the included models ranged from 0.63 to 0.91, and the optimal R(2) value ranged from 0.64 to 0.91. All of the included models were rated as having a high or unclear risk of bias, and most of them were downgraded due to inappropriate data sources or analysis processes. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: There remains much room for improvement in future modeling studies, such as high-quality data sources and model analysis. Reliable predictive models should be developed to improve the efficacy of rehabilitation treatment by clinicians. Public Library of Science 2023-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10306189/ /pubmed/37379289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287308 Text en © 2023 Zu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zu, Wanting Huang, Xuemiao Xu, Tianxin Du, Lin Wang, Yiming Wang, Lisheng Nie, Wenbo Machine learning in predicting outcomes for stroke patients following rehabilitation treatment: A systematic review |
title | Machine learning in predicting outcomes for stroke patients following rehabilitation treatment: A systematic review |
title_full | Machine learning in predicting outcomes for stroke patients following rehabilitation treatment: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Machine learning in predicting outcomes for stroke patients following rehabilitation treatment: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning in predicting outcomes for stroke patients following rehabilitation treatment: A systematic review |
title_short | Machine learning in predicting outcomes for stroke patients following rehabilitation treatment: A systematic review |
title_sort | machine learning in predicting outcomes for stroke patients following rehabilitation treatment: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10306189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37379289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287308 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zuwanting machinelearninginpredictingoutcomesforstrokepatientsfollowingrehabilitationtreatmentasystematicreview AT huangxuemiao machinelearninginpredictingoutcomesforstrokepatientsfollowingrehabilitationtreatmentasystematicreview AT xutianxin machinelearninginpredictingoutcomesforstrokepatientsfollowingrehabilitationtreatmentasystematicreview AT dulin machinelearninginpredictingoutcomesforstrokepatientsfollowingrehabilitationtreatmentasystematicreview AT wangyiming machinelearninginpredictingoutcomesforstrokepatientsfollowingrehabilitationtreatmentasystematicreview AT wanglisheng machinelearninginpredictingoutcomesforstrokepatientsfollowingrehabilitationtreatmentasystematicreview AT niewenbo machinelearninginpredictingoutcomesforstrokepatientsfollowingrehabilitationtreatmentasystematicreview |