Cargando…

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing in South Africa: Stumbling Over the First Legal Hurdle?

Despite the growing popularity of direct-to-consumer genetic testing, there is minimal South African literature on the topic. The limited available research suggests that direct-to-consumer genetic testing is unregulated. However, we suggest that direct-to-consumer genetic testing is indeed regulate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gooden, Amy, Thaldar, Donrich W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10306243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37383487
http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2022/v25i0a11764
_version_ 1785065896465661952
author Gooden, Amy
Thaldar, Donrich W
author_facet Gooden, Amy
Thaldar, Donrich W
author_sort Gooden, Amy
collection PubMed
description Despite the growing popularity of direct-to-consumer genetic testing, there is minimal South African literature on the topic. The limited available research suggests that direct-to-consumer genetic testing is unregulated. However, we suggest that direct-to-consumer genetic testing is indeed regulated, and unusually so. The first step in the process – the collection of a saliva sample by consumers themselves – is unlawful on a plain reading of the National Health Act 61 of 2003 and the Regulations Relating to the Use of Human Biological Material. This is because these statutes require that certain healthcare professionals must remove saliva for genetic testing. Yet, on closer analysis, such an apparent ban on the self-collection of saliva is neither aligned with a purposive interpretation of the relevant legislation, nor would it survive constitutional scrutiny – as it impedes an individual’s autonomy. It is concluded that, contrary to a plain reading of the relevant statutes, individuals can lawfully collect their own saliva for direct-to-consumer genetic testing. To provide legal clarity we recommend that the relevant provisions of the National Health Act 61 of 2003 and Regulations Relating to the Use of Human Biological the Material be amended to allow individuals to collect their own saliva samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10306243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103062432023-06-28 Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing in South Africa: Stumbling Over the First Legal Hurdle? Gooden, Amy Thaldar, Donrich W Potchefstroom Electron Law J Article Despite the growing popularity of direct-to-consumer genetic testing, there is minimal South African literature on the topic. The limited available research suggests that direct-to-consumer genetic testing is unregulated. However, we suggest that direct-to-consumer genetic testing is indeed regulated, and unusually so. The first step in the process – the collection of a saliva sample by consumers themselves – is unlawful on a plain reading of the National Health Act 61 of 2003 and the Regulations Relating to the Use of Human Biological Material. This is because these statutes require that certain healthcare professionals must remove saliva for genetic testing. Yet, on closer analysis, such an apparent ban on the self-collection of saliva is neither aligned with a purposive interpretation of the relevant legislation, nor would it survive constitutional scrutiny – as it impedes an individual’s autonomy. It is concluded that, contrary to a plain reading of the relevant statutes, individuals can lawfully collect their own saliva for direct-to-consumer genetic testing. To provide legal clarity we recommend that the relevant provisions of the National Health Act 61 of 2003 and Regulations Relating to the Use of Human Biological the Material be amended to allow individuals to collect their own saliva samples. 2022 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10306243/ /pubmed/37383487 http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2022/v25i0a11764 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Gooden, Amy
Thaldar, Donrich W
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing in South Africa: Stumbling Over the First Legal Hurdle?
title Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing in South Africa: Stumbling Over the First Legal Hurdle?
title_full Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing in South Africa: Stumbling Over the First Legal Hurdle?
title_fullStr Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing in South Africa: Stumbling Over the First Legal Hurdle?
title_full_unstemmed Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing in South Africa: Stumbling Over the First Legal Hurdle?
title_short Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing in South Africa: Stumbling Over the First Legal Hurdle?
title_sort direct-to-consumer genetic testing in south africa: stumbling over the first legal hurdle?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10306243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37383487
http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2022/v25i0a11764
work_keys_str_mv AT goodenamy directtoconsumergenetictestinginsouthafricastumblingoverthefirstlegalhurdle
AT thaldardonrichw directtoconsumergenetictestinginsouthafricastumblingoverthefirstlegalhurdle