Cargando…

Industrial development alters wolf spatial distribution mediated by prey availability

Increasing resource extraction and human activity are reshaping species' spatial distributions in human‐altered landscape and consequently shaping the dynamics of interspecific interactions, such as between predators and prey. To evaluate the effects of industrial features and human activity on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boczulak, Hannah, Boucher, Nicole P., Ladle, Andrew, Boyce, Mark S., Fisher, Jason T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10307794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37396026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10224
_version_ 1785066110203199488
author Boczulak, Hannah
Boucher, Nicole P.
Ladle, Andrew
Boyce, Mark S.
Fisher, Jason T.
author_facet Boczulak, Hannah
Boucher, Nicole P.
Ladle, Andrew
Boyce, Mark S.
Fisher, Jason T.
author_sort Boczulak, Hannah
collection PubMed
description Increasing resource extraction and human activity are reshaping species' spatial distributions in human‐altered landscape and consequently shaping the dynamics of interspecific interactions, such as between predators and prey. To evaluate the effects of industrial features and human activity on the occurrence of wolves (Canis lupus), we used wildlife detection data collected in 2014 from an array of 122 remote wildlife camera traps in Alberta's Rocky Mountains and foothills near Hinton, Canada. Using generalized linear models, we compared the occurrence frequency of wolves at camera sites to natural land cover, industrial disturbance (forestry and oil/gas exploration), human activity (motorized and non‐motorized), and prey availability (moose, Alces alces; elk, Cervus elaphus; mule deer, Odocoileus hemionus; and white‐tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus). Industrial block features (well sites and cutblocks) and prey (elk or mule deer) availability interacted to influence wolf occurrence, but models including motorized and non‐motorized human activity were not strongly supported. Wolves occurred infrequently at sites with high densities of well sites and cutblocks, except when elk or mule deer were frequently detected. Our results suggest that wolves risk using industrial block features when prey occur frequently to increase predation opportunities, but otherwise avoid them due to risk of human encounters. Effective management of wolves in anthropogenically altered landscapes thus requires the simultaneous consideration of industrial block features and populations of elk and mule deer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10307794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103077942023-06-30 Industrial development alters wolf spatial distribution mediated by prey availability Boczulak, Hannah Boucher, Nicole P. Ladle, Andrew Boyce, Mark S. Fisher, Jason T. Ecol Evol Research Articles Increasing resource extraction and human activity are reshaping species' spatial distributions in human‐altered landscape and consequently shaping the dynamics of interspecific interactions, such as between predators and prey. To evaluate the effects of industrial features and human activity on the occurrence of wolves (Canis lupus), we used wildlife detection data collected in 2014 from an array of 122 remote wildlife camera traps in Alberta's Rocky Mountains and foothills near Hinton, Canada. Using generalized linear models, we compared the occurrence frequency of wolves at camera sites to natural land cover, industrial disturbance (forestry and oil/gas exploration), human activity (motorized and non‐motorized), and prey availability (moose, Alces alces; elk, Cervus elaphus; mule deer, Odocoileus hemionus; and white‐tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus). Industrial block features (well sites and cutblocks) and prey (elk or mule deer) availability interacted to influence wolf occurrence, but models including motorized and non‐motorized human activity were not strongly supported. Wolves occurred infrequently at sites with high densities of well sites and cutblocks, except when elk or mule deer were frequently detected. Our results suggest that wolves risk using industrial block features when prey occur frequently to increase predation opportunities, but otherwise avoid them due to risk of human encounters. Effective management of wolves in anthropogenically altered landscapes thus requires the simultaneous consideration of industrial block features and populations of elk and mule deer. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10307794/ /pubmed/37396026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10224 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Boczulak, Hannah
Boucher, Nicole P.
Ladle, Andrew
Boyce, Mark S.
Fisher, Jason T.
Industrial development alters wolf spatial distribution mediated by prey availability
title Industrial development alters wolf spatial distribution mediated by prey availability
title_full Industrial development alters wolf spatial distribution mediated by prey availability
title_fullStr Industrial development alters wolf spatial distribution mediated by prey availability
title_full_unstemmed Industrial development alters wolf spatial distribution mediated by prey availability
title_short Industrial development alters wolf spatial distribution mediated by prey availability
title_sort industrial development alters wolf spatial distribution mediated by prey availability
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10307794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37396026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10224
work_keys_str_mv AT boczulakhannah industrialdevelopmentalterswolfspatialdistributionmediatedbypreyavailability
AT bouchernicolep industrialdevelopmentalterswolfspatialdistributionmediatedbypreyavailability
AT ladleandrew industrialdevelopmentalterswolfspatialdistributionmediatedbypreyavailability
AT boycemarks industrialdevelopmentalterswolfspatialdistributionmediatedbypreyavailability
AT fisherjasont industrialdevelopmentalterswolfspatialdistributionmediatedbypreyavailability