Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Pulse Magnetic Therapy System in Insomnia Disorder: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: This study’s objective is to assess the efficacy and safety of Pulsed Magnetic Therapy System (PMTS) in improving insomnia disorder. METHODS: Participants with insomnia disorder were randomly assigned to receive either PMTS or sham treatment for four weeks (n= 153; PMTS: 76, sham: 77). Pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liao, Jiwu, Wang, Sisi, Zhou, Borong, Liang, Wei, Ma, Ping, Lin, Min, Lin, Weisen, Li, Congrui, Zhang, Xiaotao, Li, Hongyao, Cui, Yin, Hu, Jiajia, Qin, Yuanyi, Deng, Yanhua, Fu, Aibing, Zhu, Tianhua, Zhang, Shanlian, Qu, Yunhong, Xing, Lu, Li, Wumei, Feng, Fei, Yao, Xinping, Zhang, Guimei, Pan, Jiyang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10307909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37357671
http://dx.doi.org/10.30773/pi.2022.0362
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: This study’s objective is to assess the efficacy and safety of Pulsed Magnetic Therapy System (PMTS) in improving insomnia disorder. METHODS: Participants with insomnia disorder were randomly assigned to receive either PMTS or sham treatment for four weeks (n= 153; PMTS: 76, sham: 77). Primary outcomes are the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) scores at week 0 (baseline), 1, 2, 3, 4 (treatment), and 5 (follow-up). Secondary outcomes are the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at baseline and week 4, and weekly sleep diary-derived values for sleep latency, sleep efficiency, real sleep time, waking after sleep onset, and sleep duration. RESULTS: The ISI scores of the PMTS group and the sham group were 7.13±0.50, 11.07±0.51 at week 4, respectively. There was a significant group×time interaction for ISI (F3.214, 485.271=24.25, p<0.001, η(p)(2)=0.138). Only the PMTS group experienced continuous improvement throughout the study; in contrast, the sham group only experienced a modest improvement after the first week of therapy. At the end of the treatment and one week after it, the response of the PMTS group were 69.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.6%–79.0%), 75.0% (95% CI: 64.1%–83.4%), respectively, which were higher than the response of the sham group (p<0.001). For each of the secondary outcomes, similar group×time interactions were discovered. The effects of the treatment persisted for at least a week. CONCLUSION: PMTS is safe and effective in improving insomnia disorders.