Cargando…

The new future perspective in corneal tissue utilisation – methods of preparation and preservation

PURPOSE: The goal of our study is to find an optimal approach to the preparation and preservation of corneal stromal tissue. We want to compare different methods of corneal stromal tissue creation and storage to optimize the efficacy of this process under the conditions of an eye bank. After we find...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polachova, Martina, Netukova, Magdalena, Benada, Oldrich, Kucera, Tomas, Kolin, Vojtech, Baxant, Alina-Dana, Sirolova, Zuzana, Studeny, Pavel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10308633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03048-3
_version_ 1785066286070366208
author Polachova, Martina
Netukova, Magdalena
Benada, Oldrich
Kucera, Tomas
Kolin, Vojtech
Baxant, Alina-Dana
Sirolova, Zuzana
Studeny, Pavel
author_facet Polachova, Martina
Netukova, Magdalena
Benada, Oldrich
Kucera, Tomas
Kolin, Vojtech
Baxant, Alina-Dana
Sirolova, Zuzana
Studeny, Pavel
author_sort Polachova, Martina
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The goal of our study is to find an optimal approach to the preparation and preservation of corneal stromal tissue. We want to compare different methods of corneal stromal tissue creation and storage to optimize the efficacy of this process under the conditions of an eye bank. After we find the most suitable method to create a safe high quality product, we want to prove the possibility of using a single donor cornea for more than one patient. We would also like to verify the feasibility of making more corneal lenticules after the removal of a corneal endothelium for DMEK transplantation. METHODS: We provided morphological (histology, scanning electron microscope) and microbiological analysis in order to compare different methods of corneal lenticule and corneal stromal lamellae preparation and preservation. We also tested the surgical handling of the tissue to secure a safe manipulation of the tissue for clinical use. We compared two methods of corneal lenticule preparation: microkeratome dissection and femtosecond laser. As methods of preservation, we tested hypothermia, cryopreservation at -80 degrees Celsius in DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) and storage at room temperature with glycerol. Some intrastromal lenticules and lamellae in each group were previously irradiated with gamma radiation of 25 kGy (KiloGray). RESULTS: Corneal stromal lamellae prepared with a microkeratome have a smoother cut – side surface compared to lamellae prepared with a femtosecond laser. Femtosecond laser preparation caused more irregularities on the surface and we detected more conglomerates of the fibrils, while lamellae made with microkeratome had more sparse network. Using femtosecond laser, we were able to make more than five lenticules from a single donor cornea. Gamma irradiation led to damage of collagen fibrils in corneal stroma and a loss of their regular arrangement. Corneal tissue stored in glycerol showed collagen fibril aggregates and empty spaces between fibrils caused by dehydration. Cryopreserved tissue without previous gamma irradiation showed the most regular structure of the fibrils comparable to storage in hypothermia. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that formation of a corneal lenticule lamellae by microkeratome results in smoother corneal lenticules, while being much cheaper than formation by femtosecond laser. Gamma irradiation of 25 kGy caused damage of the collagen fibres as well as their network arrangement, which correlated with loss of transparency and stiffer structure. These changes impair possible surgical utilisation of gamma irradiated corneas. Storage in glycerol at room temperature and cryopreservation had similar outcomes and we believe that both methods are appropriate and safe for further clinical use . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-023-03048-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10308633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103086332023-06-30 The new future perspective in corneal tissue utilisation – methods of preparation and preservation Polachova, Martina Netukova, Magdalena Benada, Oldrich Kucera, Tomas Kolin, Vojtech Baxant, Alina-Dana Sirolova, Zuzana Studeny, Pavel BMC Ophthalmol Research PURPOSE: The goal of our study is to find an optimal approach to the preparation and preservation of corneal stromal tissue. We want to compare different methods of corneal stromal tissue creation and storage to optimize the efficacy of this process under the conditions of an eye bank. After we find the most suitable method to create a safe high quality product, we want to prove the possibility of using a single donor cornea for more than one patient. We would also like to verify the feasibility of making more corneal lenticules after the removal of a corneal endothelium for DMEK transplantation. METHODS: We provided morphological (histology, scanning electron microscope) and microbiological analysis in order to compare different methods of corneal lenticule and corneal stromal lamellae preparation and preservation. We also tested the surgical handling of the tissue to secure a safe manipulation of the tissue for clinical use. We compared two methods of corneal lenticule preparation: microkeratome dissection and femtosecond laser. As methods of preservation, we tested hypothermia, cryopreservation at -80 degrees Celsius in DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) and storage at room temperature with glycerol. Some intrastromal lenticules and lamellae in each group were previously irradiated with gamma radiation of 25 kGy (KiloGray). RESULTS: Corneal stromal lamellae prepared with a microkeratome have a smoother cut – side surface compared to lamellae prepared with a femtosecond laser. Femtosecond laser preparation caused more irregularities on the surface and we detected more conglomerates of the fibrils, while lamellae made with microkeratome had more sparse network. Using femtosecond laser, we were able to make more than five lenticules from a single donor cornea. Gamma irradiation led to damage of collagen fibrils in corneal stroma and a loss of their regular arrangement. Corneal tissue stored in glycerol showed collagen fibril aggregates and empty spaces between fibrils caused by dehydration. Cryopreserved tissue without previous gamma irradiation showed the most regular structure of the fibrils comparable to storage in hypothermia. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that formation of a corneal lenticule lamellae by microkeratome results in smoother corneal lenticules, while being much cheaper than formation by femtosecond laser. Gamma irradiation of 25 kGy caused damage of the collagen fibres as well as their network arrangement, which correlated with loss of transparency and stiffer structure. These changes impair possible surgical utilisation of gamma irradiated corneas. Storage in glycerol at room temperature and cryopreservation had similar outcomes and we believe that both methods are appropriate and safe for further clinical use . SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-023-03048-3. BioMed Central 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10308633/ /pubmed/37386384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03048-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Polachova, Martina
Netukova, Magdalena
Benada, Oldrich
Kucera, Tomas
Kolin, Vojtech
Baxant, Alina-Dana
Sirolova, Zuzana
Studeny, Pavel
The new future perspective in corneal tissue utilisation – methods of preparation and preservation
title The new future perspective in corneal tissue utilisation – methods of preparation and preservation
title_full The new future perspective in corneal tissue utilisation – methods of preparation and preservation
title_fullStr The new future perspective in corneal tissue utilisation – methods of preparation and preservation
title_full_unstemmed The new future perspective in corneal tissue utilisation – methods of preparation and preservation
title_short The new future perspective in corneal tissue utilisation – methods of preparation and preservation
title_sort new future perspective in corneal tissue utilisation – methods of preparation and preservation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10308633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03048-3
work_keys_str_mv AT polachovamartina thenewfutureperspectiveincornealtissueutilisationmethodsofpreparationandpreservation
AT netukovamagdalena thenewfutureperspectiveincornealtissueutilisationmethodsofpreparationandpreservation
AT benadaoldrich thenewfutureperspectiveincornealtissueutilisationmethodsofpreparationandpreservation
AT kuceratomas thenewfutureperspectiveincornealtissueutilisationmethodsofpreparationandpreservation
AT kolinvojtech thenewfutureperspectiveincornealtissueutilisationmethodsofpreparationandpreservation
AT baxantalinadana thenewfutureperspectiveincornealtissueutilisationmethodsofpreparationandpreservation
AT sirolovazuzana thenewfutureperspectiveincornealtissueutilisationmethodsofpreparationandpreservation
AT studenypavel thenewfutureperspectiveincornealtissueutilisationmethodsofpreparationandpreservation
AT polachovamartina newfutureperspectiveincornealtissueutilisationmethodsofpreparationandpreservation
AT netukovamagdalena newfutureperspectiveincornealtissueutilisationmethodsofpreparationandpreservation
AT benadaoldrich newfutureperspectiveincornealtissueutilisationmethodsofpreparationandpreservation
AT kuceratomas newfutureperspectiveincornealtissueutilisationmethodsofpreparationandpreservation
AT kolinvojtech newfutureperspectiveincornealtissueutilisationmethodsofpreparationandpreservation
AT baxantalinadana newfutureperspectiveincornealtissueutilisationmethodsofpreparationandpreservation
AT sirolovazuzana newfutureperspectiveincornealtissueutilisationmethodsofpreparationandpreservation
AT studenypavel newfutureperspectiveincornealtissueutilisationmethodsofpreparationandpreservation