Cargando…
An umbrella review of the surgical performance of Harmonic ultrasonic devices and impact on patient outcomes
BACKGROUND: For thirty years, the Harmonic scalpel has been used for precise dissection, sealing and transection. There are numerous meta-analyses on individual surgical procedures with Harmonic, but no overarching review covering all the areas. This umbrella review seeks to summarize the clinical r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10308659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02057-9 |
_version_ | 1785066292137426944 |
---|---|
author | Kloosterman, Robert Wright, George W. J. Salvo-Halloran, Elizabeth M. Ferko, Nicole C. Mennone, John Z. Clymer, Jeffrey W. Ricketts, Crystal D. Tommaselli, Giovanni A. |
author_facet | Kloosterman, Robert Wright, George W. J. Salvo-Halloran, Elizabeth M. Ferko, Nicole C. Mennone, John Z. Clymer, Jeffrey W. Ricketts, Crystal D. Tommaselli, Giovanni A. |
author_sort | Kloosterman, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For thirty years, the Harmonic scalpel has been used for precise dissection, sealing and transection. There are numerous meta-analyses on individual surgical procedures with Harmonic, but no overarching review covering all the areas. This umbrella review seeks to summarize the clinical results from the use of Harmonic across surgical fields and broadly quantify its effects on patient outcomes. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Databases were searched for meta-analyses (MAs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Harmonic devices to conventional techniques or advanced bipolar (ABP) devices. For each procedure type, the most comprehensive MAs were evaluated. RCTs not already analysed in a MA were also included. Operating time, length of stay, intraoperative blood loss, drainage volume, pain, and overall complications were evaluated, and the methodological quality and certainty of evidence were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-four systematic literature reviews were identified on colectomy, hemorrhoidectomy, gastrectomy, mastectomy, flap harvesting, cholecystectomy, thyroidectomy, tonsillectomy, and neck dissection. There were also 83 RCTs included. In every MA evaluated, Harmonic devices were associated with either statistically significant or numerical improvements in every outcome compared with conventional techniques; most MAs reported a reduction in operating time of ≥ 25 min. Harmonic versus ABP device MAs in colectomy and thyroidectomy showed no significant differences in outcomes. CONCLUSION: Across surgical procedures, Harmonic devices demonstrated improved patient outcomes for operating time, length of stay, intraoperative bleeding, drainage volume, pain, and overall complications compared to conventional techniques. Additional studies are required to assess differences between Harmonic and ABP devices. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-023-02057-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10308659 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103086592023-06-30 An umbrella review of the surgical performance of Harmonic ultrasonic devices and impact on patient outcomes Kloosterman, Robert Wright, George W. J. Salvo-Halloran, Elizabeth M. Ferko, Nicole C. Mennone, John Z. Clymer, Jeffrey W. Ricketts, Crystal D. Tommaselli, Giovanni A. BMC Surg Research BACKGROUND: For thirty years, the Harmonic scalpel has been used for precise dissection, sealing and transection. There are numerous meta-analyses on individual surgical procedures with Harmonic, but no overarching review covering all the areas. This umbrella review seeks to summarize the clinical results from the use of Harmonic across surgical fields and broadly quantify its effects on patient outcomes. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Databases were searched for meta-analyses (MAs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Harmonic devices to conventional techniques or advanced bipolar (ABP) devices. For each procedure type, the most comprehensive MAs were evaluated. RCTs not already analysed in a MA were also included. Operating time, length of stay, intraoperative blood loss, drainage volume, pain, and overall complications were evaluated, and the methodological quality and certainty of evidence were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-four systematic literature reviews were identified on colectomy, hemorrhoidectomy, gastrectomy, mastectomy, flap harvesting, cholecystectomy, thyroidectomy, tonsillectomy, and neck dissection. There were also 83 RCTs included. In every MA evaluated, Harmonic devices were associated with either statistically significant or numerical improvements in every outcome compared with conventional techniques; most MAs reported a reduction in operating time of ≥ 25 min. Harmonic versus ABP device MAs in colectomy and thyroidectomy showed no significant differences in outcomes. CONCLUSION: Across surgical procedures, Harmonic devices demonstrated improved patient outcomes for operating time, length of stay, intraoperative bleeding, drainage volume, pain, and overall complications compared to conventional techniques. Additional studies are required to assess differences between Harmonic and ABP devices. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-023-02057-9. BioMed Central 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10308659/ /pubmed/37386399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02057-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kloosterman, Robert Wright, George W. J. Salvo-Halloran, Elizabeth M. Ferko, Nicole C. Mennone, John Z. Clymer, Jeffrey W. Ricketts, Crystal D. Tommaselli, Giovanni A. An umbrella review of the surgical performance of Harmonic ultrasonic devices and impact on patient outcomes |
title | An umbrella review of the surgical performance of Harmonic ultrasonic devices and impact on patient outcomes |
title_full | An umbrella review of the surgical performance of Harmonic ultrasonic devices and impact on patient outcomes |
title_fullStr | An umbrella review of the surgical performance of Harmonic ultrasonic devices and impact on patient outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | An umbrella review of the surgical performance of Harmonic ultrasonic devices and impact on patient outcomes |
title_short | An umbrella review of the surgical performance of Harmonic ultrasonic devices and impact on patient outcomes |
title_sort | umbrella review of the surgical performance of harmonic ultrasonic devices and impact on patient outcomes |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10308659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02057-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kloostermanrobert anumbrellareviewofthesurgicalperformanceofharmonicultrasonicdevicesandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT wrightgeorgewj anumbrellareviewofthesurgicalperformanceofharmonicultrasonicdevicesandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT salvohalloranelizabethm anumbrellareviewofthesurgicalperformanceofharmonicultrasonicdevicesandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT ferkonicolec anumbrellareviewofthesurgicalperformanceofharmonicultrasonicdevicesandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT mennonejohnz anumbrellareviewofthesurgicalperformanceofharmonicultrasonicdevicesandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT clymerjeffreyw anumbrellareviewofthesurgicalperformanceofharmonicultrasonicdevicesandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT rickettscrystald anumbrellareviewofthesurgicalperformanceofharmonicultrasonicdevicesandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT tommaselligiovannia anumbrellareviewofthesurgicalperformanceofharmonicultrasonicdevicesandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT kloostermanrobert umbrellareviewofthesurgicalperformanceofharmonicultrasonicdevicesandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT wrightgeorgewj umbrellareviewofthesurgicalperformanceofharmonicultrasonicdevicesandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT salvohalloranelizabethm umbrellareviewofthesurgicalperformanceofharmonicultrasonicdevicesandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT ferkonicolec umbrellareviewofthesurgicalperformanceofharmonicultrasonicdevicesandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT mennonejohnz umbrellareviewofthesurgicalperformanceofharmonicultrasonicdevicesandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT clymerjeffreyw umbrellareviewofthesurgicalperformanceofharmonicultrasonicdevicesandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT rickettscrystald umbrellareviewofthesurgicalperformanceofharmonicultrasonicdevicesandimpactonpatientoutcomes AT tommaselligiovannia umbrellareviewofthesurgicalperformanceofharmonicultrasonicdevicesandimpactonpatientoutcomes |