Cargando…

The Shape of the Foveal Avascular Zone: When a Circle Isn't Round

Numerous metrics are used to analyze the morphometry of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ). Two such metrics, roundness and circularity, have recently shown a marked growth in their use. However, there have been inconsistencies across studies with respect to how these metrics are defined, as well as th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grieshop, Jenna, Gaffney, Mina, Linderman, Rachel E., Cooper, Robert F., Carroll, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37378965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.6.26
_version_ 1785066391183818752
author Grieshop, Jenna
Gaffney, Mina
Linderman, Rachel E.
Cooper, Robert F.
Carroll, Joseph
author_facet Grieshop, Jenna
Gaffney, Mina
Linderman, Rachel E.
Cooper, Robert F.
Carroll, Joseph
author_sort Grieshop, Jenna
collection PubMed
description Numerous metrics are used to analyze the morphometry of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ). Two such metrics, roundness and circularity, have recently shown a marked growth in their use. However, there have been inconsistencies across studies with respect to how these metrics are defined, as well as the algorithms used to calculate them. In some cases, the exact definition or algorithm is not disclosed. These issues significantly limit the translational utility of these biomarkers. We simulated FAZ shapes as circles or ellipses of differing aspect ratios and evaluated roundness and circularity with two commonly used approaches for FAZ analyses. Differing shape analysis algorithms produced conflicting results even with identical equations, and differing metric definitions produced incongruent results. Therefore caution should be used when comparing FAZ circularity and roundness metrics across studies, especially in the absence of detailed information about the algorithms used. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Quantitative assessment of OCT-A images includes evaluating circularity and roundness of the FAZ. Inconsistent or inaccurate mathematical definitions of these metrics impacts their utility as biomarkers and impairs the ability to combine and compare results across studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10309160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103091602023-06-30 The Shape of the Foveal Avascular Zone: When a Circle Isn't Round Grieshop, Jenna Gaffney, Mina Linderman, Rachel E. Cooper, Robert F. Carroll, Joseph Transl Vis Sci Technol Perspective Numerous metrics are used to analyze the morphometry of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ). Two such metrics, roundness and circularity, have recently shown a marked growth in their use. However, there have been inconsistencies across studies with respect to how these metrics are defined, as well as the algorithms used to calculate them. In some cases, the exact definition or algorithm is not disclosed. These issues significantly limit the translational utility of these biomarkers. We simulated FAZ shapes as circles or ellipses of differing aspect ratios and evaluated roundness and circularity with two commonly used approaches for FAZ analyses. Differing shape analysis algorithms produced conflicting results even with identical equations, and differing metric definitions produced incongruent results. Therefore caution should be used when comparing FAZ circularity and roundness metrics across studies, especially in the absence of detailed information about the algorithms used. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Quantitative assessment of OCT-A images includes evaluating circularity and roundness of the FAZ. Inconsistent or inaccurate mathematical definitions of these metrics impacts their utility as biomarkers and impairs the ability to combine and compare results across studies. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10309160/ /pubmed/37378965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.6.26 Text en Copyright 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Perspective
Grieshop, Jenna
Gaffney, Mina
Linderman, Rachel E.
Cooper, Robert F.
Carroll, Joseph
The Shape of the Foveal Avascular Zone: When a Circle Isn't Round
title The Shape of the Foveal Avascular Zone: When a Circle Isn't Round
title_full The Shape of the Foveal Avascular Zone: When a Circle Isn't Round
title_fullStr The Shape of the Foveal Avascular Zone: When a Circle Isn't Round
title_full_unstemmed The Shape of the Foveal Avascular Zone: When a Circle Isn't Round
title_short The Shape of the Foveal Avascular Zone: When a Circle Isn't Round
title_sort shape of the foveal avascular zone: when a circle isn't round
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37378965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.6.26
work_keys_str_mv AT grieshopjenna theshapeofthefovealavascularzonewhenacircleisntround
AT gaffneymina theshapeofthefovealavascularzonewhenacircleisntround
AT lindermanrachele theshapeofthefovealavascularzonewhenacircleisntround
AT cooperrobertf theshapeofthefovealavascularzonewhenacircleisntround
AT carrolljoseph theshapeofthefovealavascularzonewhenacircleisntround
AT grieshopjenna shapeofthefovealavascularzonewhenacircleisntround
AT gaffneymina shapeofthefovealavascularzonewhenacircleisntround
AT lindermanrachele shapeofthefovealavascularzonewhenacircleisntround
AT cooperrobertf shapeofthefovealavascularzonewhenacircleisntround
AT carrolljoseph shapeofthefovealavascularzonewhenacircleisntround