Cargando…

Preterm Preeclampsia and Timing of Delivery: A Systematic Literature Review

Introduction Preeclampsia, a multifactorial disease with pathophysiology not yet fully understood, is a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, especially when preterm. The diagnosis is performed when there is an association between arterial hypertension and proteinuria or evi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guida, José Paulo de Siqueira, Surita, Fernanda Garanhani, Parpinelli, Mary Angela, Costa, Maria Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604103
_version_ 1785066428916826112
author Guida, José Paulo de Siqueira
Surita, Fernanda Garanhani
Parpinelli, Mary Angela
Costa, Maria Laura
author_facet Guida, José Paulo de Siqueira
Surita, Fernanda Garanhani
Parpinelli, Mary Angela
Costa, Maria Laura
author_sort Guida, José Paulo de Siqueira
collection PubMed
description Introduction Preeclampsia, a multifactorial disease with pathophysiology not yet fully understood, is a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, especially when preterm. The diagnosis is performed when there is an association between arterial hypertension and proteinuria or evidence of severity. There are unanswered questions in the literature considering the timing of delivery once preterm preeclampsia has been diagnosed, given the risk of developing maternal complications versus the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes associated with prematurity. The objective of this systematic review is to determine the best timing of delivery for women diagnosed with preeclampsia before 37 weeks of gestation. Methods Systematic literature review, performed in the PubMed database, using the terms preeclampsia, parturition and timing of delivery to look for studies conducted between 2014 and 2017. Studies that compared the maternal and perinatal outcomes of women who underwent immediate delivery or delayed delivery, in the absence of evidence of severe preeclampsia, were selected. Results A total of 629 studies were initially retrieved. After reading the titles, 78 were selected, and their abstracts, evaluated; 16 were then evaluated in full and, in the end, 6 studies (2 randomized clinical trials and 4 observational studies) met the inclusion criteria. The results were presented according to gestational age range (< 34 weeks and between 34 and 37 weeks) and by maternal and perinatal outcomes, according to the timing of delivery, considering immediate delivery or expectant management. Before 34 weeks, the maternal outcomes were similar, but the perinatal outcomes were significantly worse when immediate delivery occurred. Between 34 and 37 weeks, the progression to severe maternal disease was slightly higher among women undergoing expectant management, however, with better perinatal outcomes. Conclusions When there is no evidence of severe preeclampsia or impaired fetal well-being, especially before 34 weeks, the pregnancy should be carefully surveilled, and the delivery, postponed, aiming at improving the perinatal outcomes. Between 34 and 37 weeks, the decision on the timing of delivery should be shared with the pregnant woman and her family, after providing information regarding the risks of adverse outcomes associated with preeclampsia and prematurity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10309339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103093392023-07-27 Preterm Preeclampsia and Timing of Delivery: A Systematic Literature Review Guida, José Paulo de Siqueira Surita, Fernanda Garanhani Parpinelli, Mary Angela Costa, Maria Laura Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Introduction Preeclampsia, a multifactorial disease with pathophysiology not yet fully understood, is a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, especially when preterm. The diagnosis is performed when there is an association between arterial hypertension and proteinuria or evidence of severity. There are unanswered questions in the literature considering the timing of delivery once preterm preeclampsia has been diagnosed, given the risk of developing maternal complications versus the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes associated with prematurity. The objective of this systematic review is to determine the best timing of delivery for women diagnosed with preeclampsia before 37 weeks of gestation. Methods Systematic literature review, performed in the PubMed database, using the terms preeclampsia, parturition and timing of delivery to look for studies conducted between 2014 and 2017. Studies that compared the maternal and perinatal outcomes of women who underwent immediate delivery or delayed delivery, in the absence of evidence of severe preeclampsia, were selected. Results A total of 629 studies were initially retrieved. After reading the titles, 78 were selected, and their abstracts, evaluated; 16 were then evaluated in full and, in the end, 6 studies (2 randomized clinical trials and 4 observational studies) met the inclusion criteria. The results were presented according to gestational age range (< 34 weeks and between 34 and 37 weeks) and by maternal and perinatal outcomes, according to the timing of delivery, considering immediate delivery or expectant management. Before 34 weeks, the maternal outcomes were similar, but the perinatal outcomes were significantly worse when immediate delivery occurred. Between 34 and 37 weeks, the progression to severe maternal disease was slightly higher among women undergoing expectant management, however, with better perinatal outcomes. Conclusions When there is no evidence of severe preeclampsia or impaired fetal well-being, especially before 34 weeks, the pregnancy should be carefully surveilled, and the delivery, postponed, aiming at improving the perinatal outcomes. Between 34 and 37 weeks, the decision on the timing of delivery should be shared with the pregnant woman and her family, after providing information regarding the risks of adverse outcomes associated with preeclampsia and prematurity. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2017-07-12 2017-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10309339/ /pubmed/28701023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604103 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Guida, José Paulo de Siqueira
Surita, Fernanda Garanhani
Parpinelli, Mary Angela
Costa, Maria Laura
Preterm Preeclampsia and Timing of Delivery: A Systematic Literature Review
title Preterm Preeclampsia and Timing of Delivery: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Preterm Preeclampsia and Timing of Delivery: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Preterm Preeclampsia and Timing of Delivery: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Preterm Preeclampsia and Timing of Delivery: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Preterm Preeclampsia and Timing of Delivery: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort preterm preeclampsia and timing of delivery: a systematic literature review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604103
work_keys_str_mv AT guidajosepaulodesiqueira pretermpreeclampsiaandtimingofdeliveryasystematicliteraturereview
AT suritafernandagaranhani pretermpreeclampsiaandtimingofdeliveryasystematicliteraturereview
AT parpinellimaryangela pretermpreeclampsiaandtimingofdeliveryasystematicliteraturereview
AT costamarialaura pretermpreeclampsiaandtimingofdeliveryasystematicliteraturereview