Cargando…

Induction of Labor using Misoprostol in a Tertiary Hospital in the Southeast of Brazil

Purpose To assess cases of labor induction with vaginal 25-µg tablets of misoprostol and maternal outcomes in a tertiary hospital in southeastern Brazil. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 412 pregnant women with indication for labor induction. Labor induction was performed with vagina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Silva, Tácito Augusto Godoy, Borges Júnior, Luciano Eliziário, Tahan, Luisa Almeida, Costa, Taynná Ferreira Arantes, Magalhães, Fernanda Oliveira, Peixoto, Alberto Borges, Martins, Wellington de Paula, Araujo Júnior, Edward
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2017
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604259

Ejemplares similares

Can the Induction of Labor with Misoprostol Increase Maternal Blood Loss?
por: Souza, Paulo César Praciano, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for labor induction
por: Elpo, Jhonathan Alcides, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The impact of first-trimester intrauterine hematoma on adverse perinatal outcomes
por: Peixoto, Alberto Borges, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Analysis of Variables that Influence the Success Rates of Induction of Labor with Misoprostol: A Retrospective Observational Study
por: Corrêa, Thayane Delazari, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Sublingual misoprostol vs. oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor: A retrospective study
por: Amini, Mahdi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Labor Induction with Intravaginal Misoprostol versus Spontaneous Labor: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
por: Ozbasli, Esra, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Labor induction with randomized comparison of cervical, oral and intravaginal misoprostol
por: Dadashaliha, Masoumeh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term
por: Vorontsova, Yana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial
por: Young, David C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of Intracervical Foley’s Catheter With Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Kadu, Nivedita A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Vahid Roudsari, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Labor Induction with Orally Administrated Misoprostol: A Retrospective Cohort Study
por: Wallstrom, Tove, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Survey of Provider Preferences Regarding the Route of Misoprostol for Induction of Labor at Term
por: Towns, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Effect of delayed misoprostol dosing interval for induction of labor: a retrospective study
por: Harman Crowell, Elizabeth H., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Induction of Labor in Primigravid Term Pregnancy with Misoprostol or Dinoprostone: A Comparative Study
por: Arif, Rizwana, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Outpatient vs inpatient induction of labor with oral misoprostol: A retrospective study
por: Hallén, Natalie, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Efficacy of Misoprostol Vaginal Inserts for Induction of Labor in Women with Very Unfavorable Cervices
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study
por: Marsdal, Kjersti Engen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Fetal biometric parameters: Reference charts for a non-selected risk population from Uberaba, Brazil
por: Peixoto, Alberto Borges, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A novel misoprostol delivery system for induction of labor: clinical utility and patient considerations
por: Stephenson, Megan L, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Is Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Safe for the Induction of Labor in High-Risk Pregnancy Obese Women?
por: Varlas, Valentin Nicolae, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Maternal and fetal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor with low dose vaginal misoprostol
por: Shafqat, Tanveer, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Labor induction with combined low-dose oral misoprostol and Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol alone at term gestation—a randomized study
por: Anjali, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy
por: Wang, Xiu, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A critical appraisal of the misoprostol removable, controlled-release vaginal delivery system of labor induction
por: Patte, Charlotte, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Clinical experience with misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a prospective clinical observational study
por: Schmidt, Markus, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A pilot study to compare propranolol and misoprostol versus misoprostol and placebo for induction of labor in primigravidae; a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
por: Abdel Hamid, Ahmed Sherif, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Effect of extra-amniotic Foley’s catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial
por: Osoti, Alfred, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study
por: Ayati, Sedigheh, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparing the effects of vaginal misoprostol, laminaria, and extra amniotic saline infusion on cervical ripening and induction of labor
por: Tabasi, Zohreh, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparative study of dinoprostone and misoprostol for induction of labor in patients with premature rupture of membranes after 35 weeks
por: Sire, Flavie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Women’s experiences and views of outpatient and inpatient induction of labor with oral misoprostol: A secondary qualitative study
por: Hægeland, Hanne A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Outcome of misoprostol and oxytocin in induction of labour
por: Acharya, Trishna, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Nonpharmacological Methods to Reduce Pain During Active Labor in A Real-life Setting
por: Silva, Clarissa Bernardes de Oliveira, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Second trimester cervical length measurement for prediction spontaneous preterm birth in an unselected risk population
por: Peixoto, Alberto Borges, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Sublingual versus Vaginal Misoprostol for the Induction of Labor at Term: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
por: Jahromi, Bahia Namavar, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Intravaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction in Nulliparous Women: A Double-blinded, Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
por: Zhang, Yu, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparison of the effect of oral and vaginal misoprostol on labor induction: updating a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies
por: Rahimi, Maryam, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Misoprostol, Intravenous Oxytocin, and Intravaginal Dinoprostone for Labor Induction in Pakistani Women
por: Wasim, Asad Ullah, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
por: Bolla, Daniele, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_6ts6mbs7n785sekf33e9766mt9