Cargando…

Can the Pessary Use Modify the Vaginal Microbiological Flora? A Cross-sectional Study

Introduction Vaginal pessary is used as a conservative treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Some studies have shown that common complaints of its use may include vaginal discomfort and increased vaginal discharge. Scant information is available about the microflora status after using this devi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coelho, Suelene Costa de Albuquerque, Giraldo, Paulo César, Florentino, Juliana Oquendo, Castro, Edilson Benedito de, Brito, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira, Juliato, Cássia Raquel Teatin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme-Revinter Publicações Ltda 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28399595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1601437
_version_ 1785066441356083200
author Coelho, Suelene Costa de Albuquerque
Giraldo, Paulo César
Florentino, Juliana Oquendo
Castro, Edilson Benedito de
Brito, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira
Juliato, Cássia Raquel Teatin
author_facet Coelho, Suelene Costa de Albuquerque
Giraldo, Paulo César
Florentino, Juliana Oquendo
Castro, Edilson Benedito de
Brito, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira
Juliato, Cássia Raquel Teatin
author_sort Coelho, Suelene Costa de Albuquerque
collection PubMed
description Introduction Vaginal pessary is used as a conservative treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Some studies have shown that common complaints of its use may include vaginal discomfort and increased vaginal discharge. Scant information is available about the microflora status after using this device. Objective To determine if the usage of vaginal pessary can interfere with the vaginal environment. Methods A cross-sectional study was performed from March of 2014 to July of 2015 including 90 women with POP. The study group was composed of 45 women users of vaginal pessary and 45 nom-users. All enrolled women answered a standardized questionnaire and were subjected to a gynecological exam to collect vaginal samples for microbiological evaluation under optic microscopy. Clinical and microbiological data were compared between study and control groups. Results Vaginal discharge was confirmed in 84% of the study group versus 62.2% in the control group (p < 0.01); itching was reported in 20 and 2.2%, respectively (p < .05); genital ulcers were only found in the pessary group (20%). There was no difference with regard to the type of vaginal flora. Bacterial vaginosis was prevalent in the study group (31.1% study group versus 22.2% control group), (p =.34). Conclusion Women using vaginal pessaries for POP treatment presented more vaginal discharge, itching and genital ulcers than non-users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10309420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Thieme-Revinter Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103094202023-07-27 Can the Pessary Use Modify the Vaginal Microbiological Flora? A Cross-sectional Study Coelho, Suelene Costa de Albuquerque Giraldo, Paulo César Florentino, Juliana Oquendo Castro, Edilson Benedito de Brito, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Juliato, Cássia Raquel Teatin Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Introduction Vaginal pessary is used as a conservative treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Some studies have shown that common complaints of its use may include vaginal discomfort and increased vaginal discharge. Scant information is available about the microflora status after using this device. Objective To determine if the usage of vaginal pessary can interfere with the vaginal environment. Methods A cross-sectional study was performed from March of 2014 to July of 2015 including 90 women with POP. The study group was composed of 45 women users of vaginal pessary and 45 nom-users. All enrolled women answered a standardized questionnaire and were subjected to a gynecological exam to collect vaginal samples for microbiological evaluation under optic microscopy. Clinical and microbiological data were compared between study and control groups. Results Vaginal discharge was confirmed in 84% of the study group versus 62.2% in the control group (p < 0.01); itching was reported in 20 and 2.2%, respectively (p < .05); genital ulcers were only found in the pessary group (20%). There was no difference with regard to the type of vaginal flora. Bacterial vaginosis was prevalent in the study group (31.1% study group versus 22.2% control group), (p =.34). Conclusion Women using vaginal pessaries for POP treatment presented more vaginal discharge, itching and genital ulcers than non-users. Thieme-Revinter Publicações Ltda 2017-04-11 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10309420/ /pubmed/28399595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1601437 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Coelho, Suelene Costa de Albuquerque
Giraldo, Paulo César
Florentino, Juliana Oquendo
Castro, Edilson Benedito de
Brito, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira
Juliato, Cássia Raquel Teatin
Can the Pessary Use Modify the Vaginal Microbiological Flora? A Cross-sectional Study
title Can the Pessary Use Modify the Vaginal Microbiological Flora? A Cross-sectional Study
title_full Can the Pessary Use Modify the Vaginal Microbiological Flora? A Cross-sectional Study
title_fullStr Can the Pessary Use Modify the Vaginal Microbiological Flora? A Cross-sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Can the Pessary Use Modify the Vaginal Microbiological Flora? A Cross-sectional Study
title_short Can the Pessary Use Modify the Vaginal Microbiological Flora? A Cross-sectional Study
title_sort can the pessary use modify the vaginal microbiological flora? a cross-sectional study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28399595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1601437
work_keys_str_mv AT coelhosuelenecostadealbuquerque canthepessaryusemodifythevaginalmicrobiologicalfloraacrosssectionalstudy
AT giraldopaulocesar canthepessaryusemodifythevaginalmicrobiologicalfloraacrosssectionalstudy
AT florentinojulianaoquendo canthepessaryusemodifythevaginalmicrobiologicalfloraacrosssectionalstudy
AT castroedilsonbeneditode canthepessaryusemodifythevaginalmicrobiologicalfloraacrosssectionalstudy
AT britoluizgustavooliveira canthepessaryusemodifythevaginalmicrobiologicalfloraacrosssectionalstudy
AT juliatocassiaraquelteatin canthepessaryusemodifythevaginalmicrobiologicalfloraacrosssectionalstudy