Cargando…

Robson Classification System Applied to Induction of Labor

Objective Induction of labor (IL) is a common obstetric procedure, but it is questionable whether or not it results in higher cesarean section (CS) rates. The present study aims to evaluate the impact of IL in the overall CS rates and to analyze these rates according to the method of IL employed and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vargas, Sara, Rego, Susana, Clode, Nuno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30071570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1667340
_version_ 1785066449587404800
author Vargas, Sara
Rego, Susana
Clode, Nuno
author_facet Vargas, Sara
Rego, Susana
Clode, Nuno
author_sort Vargas, Sara
collection PubMed
description Objective Induction of labor (IL) is a common obstetric procedure, but it is questionable whether or not it results in higher cesarean section (CS) rates. The present study aims to evaluate the impact of IL in the overall CS rates and to analyze these rates according to the method of IL employed and to the Robson group in which it was applied. Methods We have conducted a retrospective study including pregnant women whose labor was induced at a tertiary hospital in 2015 and 2016. All women were classified according to the Robson Classification System (RCS). The CS rates were analyzed and compared regarding the method of IL employed. Results A total of 1,166 cases were included. The CS rate after IL was 20.9%, which represented 23.1% of the total of CSs performed in 2015 and 2016. The highest CS rates were recorded in RCS groups 5 (65.2%) and 8 (32.3%). Group 2 was the highest contributor to the overall CS rate, since it represented 56.7% of the population. The intravaginal prostaglandins method was the most used (77%). Transcervical Foley catheter was the preferred method in group 5 and intravaginal prostaglandins in all the other groups. The CS rate was higher when transcervical Foley catheter was used (34.1%). Conclusion Transcervical Foley catheter induction was associated with a higher rate of CS, probably because it was the preferred method used in group 5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10309468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103094682023-07-27 Robson Classification System Applied to Induction of Labor Vargas, Sara Rego, Susana Clode, Nuno Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Objective Induction of labor (IL) is a common obstetric procedure, but it is questionable whether or not it results in higher cesarean section (CS) rates. The present study aims to evaluate the impact of IL in the overall CS rates and to analyze these rates according to the method of IL employed and to the Robson group in which it was applied. Methods We have conducted a retrospective study including pregnant women whose labor was induced at a tertiary hospital in 2015 and 2016. All women were classified according to the Robson Classification System (RCS). The CS rates were analyzed and compared regarding the method of IL employed. Results A total of 1,166 cases were included. The CS rate after IL was 20.9%, which represented 23.1% of the total of CSs performed in 2015 and 2016. The highest CS rates were recorded in RCS groups 5 (65.2%) and 8 (32.3%). Group 2 was the highest contributor to the overall CS rate, since it represented 56.7% of the population. The intravaginal prostaglandins method was the most used (77%). Transcervical Foley catheter was the preferred method in group 5 and intravaginal prostaglandins in all the other groups. The CS rate was higher when transcervical Foley catheter was used (34.1%). Conclusion Transcervical Foley catheter induction was associated with a higher rate of CS, probably because it was the preferred method used in group 5. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2018-08-02 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10309468/ /pubmed/30071570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1667340 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Vargas, Sara
Rego, Susana
Clode, Nuno
Robson Classification System Applied to Induction of Labor
title Robson Classification System Applied to Induction of Labor
title_full Robson Classification System Applied to Induction of Labor
title_fullStr Robson Classification System Applied to Induction of Labor
title_full_unstemmed Robson Classification System Applied to Induction of Labor
title_short Robson Classification System Applied to Induction of Labor
title_sort robson classification system applied to induction of labor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30071570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1667340
work_keys_str_mv AT vargassara robsonclassificationsystemappliedtoinductionoflabor
AT regosusana robsonclassificationsystemappliedtoinductionoflabor
AT clodenuno robsonclassificationsystemappliedtoinductionoflabor