Cargando…

Improving Perinatology Residents' Skills in Breaking Bad News: A Randomized Intervention Study

Objective Breaking bad news (BBN) is particularly difficult in perinatology. Previous research has shown that BBN skills can be learned and improved when taught and practiced. This project evaluated whether a structured training session would enhance perinatology residents' skills in BBN. Metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Setubal, Maria Silvia Vellutini, Antonio, Maria Ângela Reis Goes Monteiro, Amaral, Eliana Martorano, Boulet, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29342495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1621741
_version_ 1785066450302533632
author Setubal, Maria Silvia Vellutini
Antonio, Maria Ângela Reis Goes Monteiro
Amaral, Eliana Martorano
Boulet, John
author_facet Setubal, Maria Silvia Vellutini
Antonio, Maria Ângela Reis Goes Monteiro
Amaral, Eliana Martorano
Boulet, John
author_sort Setubal, Maria Silvia Vellutini
collection PubMed
description Objective Breaking bad news (BBN) is particularly difficult in perinatology. Previous research has shown that BBN skills can be learned and improved when taught and practiced. This project evaluated whether a structured training session would enhance perinatology residents' skills in BBN. Methods This was a randomized controlled intervention study with year 1 to 4 Perinatology residents from a medical school in Brazil, during the 2014/15 school year. A total of 61 out of 100 (61%) eligible residents volunteered to a structured training program involving communicating a perinatal loss to a simulated patient (SP) portraying the mother followed by the SP's immediate feedback, both video recorded. Later, residents were randomly assigned to BBN training based on a setting, perception, invitation, knowledge, emotion and summary (SPIKES) strategy with video reviews (intervention) or no training (control group). All residents returned for a second simulation with the same SP blinded to the intervention and portraying a similar case. Residents' performances were then evaluated by the SP with a checklist. The statistical analysis included a repeated measures analysis of covariance (RM-ANCOVA). Complementarily, the residents provided their perceptions about the simulation with feedback activities. Results Fifty-eight residents completed the program. The simulations lasted on average 12 minutes, feedback 5 minutes and SPIKES training between 1h and 2h30m. There was no significant difference in the residents' performances according to the SPs' evaluations (p = 0.55). The participants rated the simulation with feedback exercises highly. These educational activities might have offset SPIKES training impact. Conclusion The SPIKES training did not significantly impact the residents' performance. The residents endorsed the simulation with feedback as a useful training modality. Further research is needed to determine which modality is more effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10309476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103094762023-07-27 Improving Perinatology Residents' Skills in Breaking Bad News: A Randomized Intervention Study Setubal, Maria Silvia Vellutini Antonio, Maria Ângela Reis Goes Monteiro Amaral, Eliana Martorano Boulet, John Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Objective Breaking bad news (BBN) is particularly difficult in perinatology. Previous research has shown that BBN skills can be learned and improved when taught and practiced. This project evaluated whether a structured training session would enhance perinatology residents' skills in BBN. Methods This was a randomized controlled intervention study with year 1 to 4 Perinatology residents from a medical school in Brazil, during the 2014/15 school year. A total of 61 out of 100 (61%) eligible residents volunteered to a structured training program involving communicating a perinatal loss to a simulated patient (SP) portraying the mother followed by the SP's immediate feedback, both video recorded. Later, residents were randomly assigned to BBN training based on a setting, perception, invitation, knowledge, emotion and summary (SPIKES) strategy with video reviews (intervention) or no training (control group). All residents returned for a second simulation with the same SP blinded to the intervention and portraying a similar case. Residents' performances were then evaluated by the SP with a checklist. The statistical analysis included a repeated measures analysis of covariance (RM-ANCOVA). Complementarily, the residents provided their perceptions about the simulation with feedback activities. Results Fifty-eight residents completed the program. The simulations lasted on average 12 minutes, feedback 5 minutes and SPIKES training between 1h and 2h30m. There was no significant difference in the residents' performances according to the SPs' evaluations (p = 0.55). The participants rated the simulation with feedback exercises highly. These educational activities might have offset SPIKES training impact. Conclusion The SPIKES training did not significantly impact the residents' performance. The residents endorsed the simulation with feedback as a useful training modality. Further research is needed to determine which modality is more effective. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2018-01-17 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10309476/ /pubmed/29342495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1621741 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Setubal, Maria Silvia Vellutini
Antonio, Maria Ângela Reis Goes Monteiro
Amaral, Eliana Martorano
Boulet, John
Improving Perinatology Residents' Skills in Breaking Bad News: A Randomized Intervention Study
title Improving Perinatology Residents' Skills in Breaking Bad News: A Randomized Intervention Study
title_full Improving Perinatology Residents' Skills in Breaking Bad News: A Randomized Intervention Study
title_fullStr Improving Perinatology Residents' Skills in Breaking Bad News: A Randomized Intervention Study
title_full_unstemmed Improving Perinatology Residents' Skills in Breaking Bad News: A Randomized Intervention Study
title_short Improving Perinatology Residents' Skills in Breaking Bad News: A Randomized Intervention Study
title_sort improving perinatology residents' skills in breaking bad news: a randomized intervention study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29342495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1621741
work_keys_str_mv AT setubalmariasilviavellutini improvingperinatologyresidentsskillsinbreakingbadnewsarandomizedinterventionstudy
AT antoniomariaangelareisgoesmonteiro improvingperinatologyresidentsskillsinbreakingbadnewsarandomizedinterventionstudy
AT amaralelianamartorano improvingperinatologyresidentsskillsinbreakingbadnewsarandomizedinterventionstudy
AT bouletjohn improvingperinatologyresidentsskillsinbreakingbadnewsarandomizedinterventionstudy