Cargando…

Single-center initial experience with inner-branch complex EVAR in 44 patients

PURPOSE: The use of inner-branch aortic stent grafts in the treatment of complex aortic pathologies aims at broad applicability and stable bridging stent sealing compared to other endovascular technologies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early outcomes with a single manufacturer cus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kapalla, Marvin, Busch, Albert, Lutz, Brigitta, Nebelung, Heiner, Wolk, Steffen, Reeps, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37396572
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1188501
_version_ 1785066465939947520
author Kapalla, Marvin
Busch, Albert
Lutz, Brigitta
Nebelung, Heiner
Wolk, Steffen
Reeps, Christian
author_facet Kapalla, Marvin
Busch, Albert
Lutz, Brigitta
Nebelung, Heiner
Wolk, Steffen
Reeps, Christian
author_sort Kapalla, Marvin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The use of inner-branch aortic stent grafts in the treatment of complex aortic pathologies aims at broad applicability and stable bridging stent sealing compared to other endovascular technologies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early outcomes with a single manufacturer custom-made and off-the-shelf inner-branched endograft in a mixed patient cohort. METHODS: This retrospective, monocentric study between 2019 and 2022 included 44 patients treated with inner-branched aortic stent grafts (iBEVAR) as custom-made device (CMD) or off-the-shelf device (E-nside) with at least four inner branches. The primary endpoints were technical and clinical success. RESULTS: Overall, 77% (n = 34) and 23% (n = 10) of the patients (mean age 77 ± 6.5 years, n = 36 male) were treated with a custom-made iBEVAR with at least four inner branches and an off-the-shelf graft, respectively. Treatment indications were thoracoabdominal pathologies in 52.2% (n = 23), complex abdominal aneurysms in 25% (n = 11), and type Ia endoleaks in 22.7% (n = 10). Preoperative spinal catheter placement was performed in 27% (n = 12) of patients. Implantation was entirely percutaneous in 75% (n = 33). Technical success was 100%. Target vessel success manifested at 99% (178/180). There was no in-hospital mortality. Permanent paraplegia developed in 6.8% (n = 3) of patients. The mean follow-up was 12 months (range 0–52 months). Three late deaths (6.8%) occurred, one related to an aortic graft infection. Kaplan–Meier estimated 1-year survival manifested at 95% and branch patency at 98% (177/180). Re-intervention was necessary for a total of six patients (13.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Inner-branch aortic stent grafts provide a feasible option for the treatment of complex aortic pathologies, both elective (custom-made) and urgent (off-the-shelf). The technical success rate is high with acceptable short-term outcomes and moderate re-intervention rates comparable to existing platforms. Further follow-up will evaluate long-term outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10309562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103095622023-06-30 Single-center initial experience with inner-branch complex EVAR in 44 patients Kapalla, Marvin Busch, Albert Lutz, Brigitta Nebelung, Heiner Wolk, Steffen Reeps, Christian Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine PURPOSE: The use of inner-branch aortic stent grafts in the treatment of complex aortic pathologies aims at broad applicability and stable bridging stent sealing compared to other endovascular technologies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early outcomes with a single manufacturer custom-made and off-the-shelf inner-branched endograft in a mixed patient cohort. METHODS: This retrospective, monocentric study between 2019 and 2022 included 44 patients treated with inner-branched aortic stent grafts (iBEVAR) as custom-made device (CMD) or off-the-shelf device (E-nside) with at least four inner branches. The primary endpoints were technical and clinical success. RESULTS: Overall, 77% (n = 34) and 23% (n = 10) of the patients (mean age 77 ± 6.5 years, n = 36 male) were treated with a custom-made iBEVAR with at least four inner branches and an off-the-shelf graft, respectively. Treatment indications were thoracoabdominal pathologies in 52.2% (n = 23), complex abdominal aneurysms in 25% (n = 11), and type Ia endoleaks in 22.7% (n = 10). Preoperative spinal catheter placement was performed in 27% (n = 12) of patients. Implantation was entirely percutaneous in 75% (n = 33). Technical success was 100%. Target vessel success manifested at 99% (178/180). There was no in-hospital mortality. Permanent paraplegia developed in 6.8% (n = 3) of patients. The mean follow-up was 12 months (range 0–52 months). Three late deaths (6.8%) occurred, one related to an aortic graft infection. Kaplan–Meier estimated 1-year survival manifested at 95% and branch patency at 98% (177/180). Re-intervention was necessary for a total of six patients (13.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Inner-branch aortic stent grafts provide a feasible option for the treatment of complex aortic pathologies, both elective (custom-made) and urgent (off-the-shelf). The technical success rate is high with acceptable short-term outcomes and moderate re-intervention rates comparable to existing platforms. Further follow-up will evaluate long-term outcomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10309562/ /pubmed/37396572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1188501 Text en © 2023 Kapalla, Busch, Lutz, Nebelung, Wolk and Reeps. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Kapalla, Marvin
Busch, Albert
Lutz, Brigitta
Nebelung, Heiner
Wolk, Steffen
Reeps, Christian
Single-center initial experience with inner-branch complex EVAR in 44 patients
title Single-center initial experience with inner-branch complex EVAR in 44 patients
title_full Single-center initial experience with inner-branch complex EVAR in 44 patients
title_fullStr Single-center initial experience with inner-branch complex EVAR in 44 patients
title_full_unstemmed Single-center initial experience with inner-branch complex EVAR in 44 patients
title_short Single-center initial experience with inner-branch complex EVAR in 44 patients
title_sort single-center initial experience with inner-branch complex evar in 44 patients
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37396572
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1188501
work_keys_str_mv AT kapallamarvin singlecenterinitialexperiencewithinnerbranchcomplexevarin44patients
AT buschalbert singlecenterinitialexperiencewithinnerbranchcomplexevarin44patients
AT lutzbrigitta singlecenterinitialexperiencewithinnerbranchcomplexevarin44patients
AT nebelungheiner singlecenterinitialexperiencewithinnerbranchcomplexevarin44patients
AT wolksteffen singlecenterinitialexperiencewithinnerbranchcomplexevarin44patients
AT reepschristian singlecenterinitialexperiencewithinnerbranchcomplexevarin44patients