Cargando…

Barriers to and facilitators of prostate cancer screening among men in Uganda prisons

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that prostate cancer (PCa) is increasing at a rate of 5.2% per annum in Uganda and as few as 5% of men have ever been screened for PCa in Uganda. The situation may be worse among male prisoners given their ‘vulnerable status’. The goal of this study was to examine the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atuhe, Innocent, Jatho, Alfred, Nalwadda, Babra, Basaza-Ejiri, Annabella Habinka, Atuyambe, Lynn, Orem, Jackson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cancer Intelligence 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10310336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37396102
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2023.1563
_version_ 1785066517301297152
author Atuhe, Innocent
Jatho, Alfred
Nalwadda, Babra
Basaza-Ejiri, Annabella Habinka
Atuyambe, Lynn
Orem, Jackson
author_facet Atuhe, Innocent
Jatho, Alfred
Nalwadda, Babra
Basaza-Ejiri, Annabella Habinka
Atuyambe, Lynn
Orem, Jackson
author_sort Atuhe, Innocent
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that prostate cancer (PCa) is increasing at a rate of 5.2% per annum in Uganda and as few as 5% of men have ever been screened for PCa in Uganda. The situation may be worse among male prisoners given their ‘vulnerable status’. The goal of this study was to examine the perceptions, attitudes and beliefs of men in Ugandan prisons regarding barriers to and facilitators of PCa screening. This would enable the identification of potential interventional strategies to promote PCa screening among men in Ugandan prisons. METHODS: This study applied the explanatory sequential mixed methods study design. We first conducted 20 focus group discussions and 17 key informant interviews. The qualitative data were analysed to enrich a survey among 2,565 prisoners selected using a simple random sampling technique. RESULTS: Qualitatively, the belief that all cancers have no cure was a barrier against most participants considering screening to be of any value, coupled with the fear of screening positive for PCa and the associated stress. In addition, poor PCa knowledge and lack of PCa screening services in prisons were perceived as barriers to PCa screening in prison settings. The quantitative data from the survey of 2,565 participants with a mean age of 50.2 (9.8), indicated that the main barriers to PCa screening were mainly myths, beliefs, lack of screening facilities and technical capacity. The majority believed that creating PCa awareness, conducting screening outreach in prisons, and providing equipment for PCa screening in prisons health facilities will facilitate PCa screening, as well as working with the Uganda prison service to train the prison health staff to perform PCa screen to facilitate Prison Health Centres capacity to screen for PCa. CONCLUSION: There is a need to develop interventions to increase awareness among the inmates in the prison health system, while ensuring that the prison health facilities are equipped with the required screening logistics, backed with outreaches from cancer-specialised hospitals/facilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10310336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cancer Intelligence
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103103362023-06-30 Barriers to and facilitators of prostate cancer screening among men in Uganda prisons Atuhe, Innocent Jatho, Alfred Nalwadda, Babra Basaza-Ejiri, Annabella Habinka Atuyambe, Lynn Orem, Jackson Ecancermedicalscience Research BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that prostate cancer (PCa) is increasing at a rate of 5.2% per annum in Uganda and as few as 5% of men have ever been screened for PCa in Uganda. The situation may be worse among male prisoners given their ‘vulnerable status’. The goal of this study was to examine the perceptions, attitudes and beliefs of men in Ugandan prisons regarding barriers to and facilitators of PCa screening. This would enable the identification of potential interventional strategies to promote PCa screening among men in Ugandan prisons. METHODS: This study applied the explanatory sequential mixed methods study design. We first conducted 20 focus group discussions and 17 key informant interviews. The qualitative data were analysed to enrich a survey among 2,565 prisoners selected using a simple random sampling technique. RESULTS: Qualitatively, the belief that all cancers have no cure was a barrier against most participants considering screening to be of any value, coupled with the fear of screening positive for PCa and the associated stress. In addition, poor PCa knowledge and lack of PCa screening services in prisons were perceived as barriers to PCa screening in prison settings. The quantitative data from the survey of 2,565 participants with a mean age of 50.2 (9.8), indicated that the main barriers to PCa screening were mainly myths, beliefs, lack of screening facilities and technical capacity. The majority believed that creating PCa awareness, conducting screening outreach in prisons, and providing equipment for PCa screening in prisons health facilities will facilitate PCa screening, as well as working with the Uganda prison service to train the prison health staff to perform PCa screen to facilitate Prison Health Centres capacity to screen for PCa. CONCLUSION: There is a need to develop interventions to increase awareness among the inmates in the prison health system, while ensuring that the prison health facilities are equipped with the required screening logistics, backed with outreaches from cancer-specialised hospitals/facilities. Cancer Intelligence 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10310336/ /pubmed/37396102 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2023.1563 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Atuhe, Innocent
Jatho, Alfred
Nalwadda, Babra
Basaza-Ejiri, Annabella Habinka
Atuyambe, Lynn
Orem, Jackson
Barriers to and facilitators of prostate cancer screening among men in Uganda prisons
title Barriers to and facilitators of prostate cancer screening among men in Uganda prisons
title_full Barriers to and facilitators of prostate cancer screening among men in Uganda prisons
title_fullStr Barriers to and facilitators of prostate cancer screening among men in Uganda prisons
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to and facilitators of prostate cancer screening among men in Uganda prisons
title_short Barriers to and facilitators of prostate cancer screening among men in Uganda prisons
title_sort barriers to and facilitators of prostate cancer screening among men in uganda prisons
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10310336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37396102
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2023.1563
work_keys_str_mv AT atuheinnocent barrierstoandfacilitatorsofprostatecancerscreeningamongmeninugandaprisons
AT jathoalfred barrierstoandfacilitatorsofprostatecancerscreeningamongmeninugandaprisons
AT nalwaddababra barrierstoandfacilitatorsofprostatecancerscreeningamongmeninugandaprisons
AT basazaejiriannabellahabinka barrierstoandfacilitatorsofprostatecancerscreeningamongmeninugandaprisons
AT atuyambelynn barrierstoandfacilitatorsofprostatecancerscreeningamongmeninugandaprisons
AT oremjackson barrierstoandfacilitatorsofprostatecancerscreeningamongmeninugandaprisons