Cargando…
Graft Selection Between Tendon Autograft and Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on the Histological Perspective: A Meta-Analysis
Objective: The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare ligament healing on autograft and allograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: The selection of appropriate studies was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10310419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37396080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768618 |
_version_ | 1785066536413691904 |
---|---|
author | Setiawan, Celleen Rei Aryana, I Gusti Ngurah Wien |
author_facet | Setiawan, Celleen Rei Aryana, I Gusti Ngurah Wien |
author_sort | Setiawan, Celleen Rei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare ligament healing on autograft and allograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: The selection of appropriate studies was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We made a statistical analysis using a review manager. Electronic reports were searched using the PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases. The inclusion criteria were animal studies and cellular histology of both grafts as an outcome. Results: The initial search revealed 412 potential articles. After duplicates were removed, 246 articles remained. Then, 14 articles were obtained and screened for relevance and eligibility. The relevant articles were searched manually, checking for eligibility and details in order not to miss included reports. Subsequently, 5 studies were included, with a total of 232 samples, reporting the biopsied results with quantitative histology of ligament healing between allograft and autograft. The biopsy samples in those studies were examined under light or electron microscope, to analyze the cellular distribution area and ligamentization stages in each group. Meta-analyses found significant difference between autograft and allograft (Heterogeneity, I2 = 89%; Mean Difference, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −34.92, −54.90, −14.93; p = 0.0006). There is also a significant difference on both graft in cellular count at over 24 weeks (Heterogeneity, I2 = 26%; Mean Difference, 95% CI = −14.59, −16.24, −12.94; p < 0.00001). Conclusion: In the current meta-analysis, autograft shows a significant difference when compared to allograft, with more cellular accumulation and faster remodeling response on the ligamentization process being noticed in the former. However, a larger clinical trial will be needed to emphasize this literature's result. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10310419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103104192023-06-30 Graft Selection Between Tendon Autograft and Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on the Histological Perspective: A Meta-Analysis Setiawan, Celleen Rei Aryana, I Gusti Ngurah Wien Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Objective: The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare ligament healing on autograft and allograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: The selection of appropriate studies was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We made a statistical analysis using a review manager. Electronic reports were searched using the PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases. The inclusion criteria were animal studies and cellular histology of both grafts as an outcome. Results: The initial search revealed 412 potential articles. After duplicates were removed, 246 articles remained. Then, 14 articles were obtained and screened for relevance and eligibility. The relevant articles were searched manually, checking for eligibility and details in order not to miss included reports. Subsequently, 5 studies were included, with a total of 232 samples, reporting the biopsied results with quantitative histology of ligament healing between allograft and autograft. The biopsy samples in those studies were examined under light or electron microscope, to analyze the cellular distribution area and ligamentization stages in each group. Meta-analyses found significant difference between autograft and allograft (Heterogeneity, I2 = 89%; Mean Difference, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −34.92, −54.90, −14.93; p = 0.0006). There is also a significant difference on both graft in cellular count at over 24 weeks (Heterogeneity, I2 = 26%; Mean Difference, 95% CI = −14.59, −16.24, −12.94; p < 0.00001). Conclusion: In the current meta-analysis, autograft shows a significant difference when compared to allograft, with more cellular accumulation and faster remodeling response on the ligamentization process being noticed in the former. However, a larger clinical trial will be needed to emphasize this literature's result. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10310419/ /pubmed/37396080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768618 Text en Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Setiawan, Celleen Rei Aryana, I Gusti Ngurah Wien Graft Selection Between Tendon Autograft and Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on the Histological Perspective: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Graft Selection Between Tendon Autograft and Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on the Histological Perspective: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Graft Selection Between Tendon Autograft and Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on the Histological Perspective: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Graft Selection Between Tendon Autograft and Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on the Histological Perspective: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Graft Selection Between Tendon Autograft and Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on the Histological Perspective: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Graft Selection Between Tendon Autograft and Allograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on the Histological Perspective: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | graft selection between tendon autograft and allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on the histological perspective: a meta-analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10310419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37396080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768618 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT setiawancelleenrei graftselectionbetweentendonautograftandallograftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionbasedonthehistologicalperspectiveametaanalysis AT aryanaigustingurahwien graftselectionbetweentendonautograftandallograftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionbasedonthehistologicalperspectiveametaanalysis |