Cargando…
Syndecan-1 predicts hemodynamic instability in critically ill patients under intermittent hemodialysis
INTRODUCTION: Up to 70% of intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) sessions in critically ill patients are complicated by hemodynamic instability. Although several clinical characteristics have been associated with hemodynamic instability during IHD, the discriminatory capacity of predicting such events dur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10310513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37398688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad043 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: Up to 70% of intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) sessions in critically ill patients are complicated by hemodynamic instability. Although several clinical characteristics have been associated with hemodynamic instability during IHD, the discriminatory capacity of predicting such events during IHD sessions is less defined. In the present study, we aimed to analyse endothelium-related biomarkers collected before IHD sessions and their capacity to predict hemodynamic instability related to IHD in critically ill patients. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we enrolled adult critically ill patients with acute kidney injury who required fluid removal with IHD. We screened each included patient daily for IHD sessions. Thirty minutes before each IHD session, each patient had a 5-mL blood collection for measurement of endothelial biomarkers—vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), angiopoietin-1 and -2 (AGPT1 and AGPT2) and syndecan-1. Hemodynamic instability during IHD was the main outcome. Analyses were adjusted for variables already known to be associated with hemodynamic instability during IHD. RESULTS: Plasma syndecan-1 was the only endothelium-related biomarker independently associated with hemodynamic instability. The accuracy of syndecan-1 for predicting hemodynamic instability during IHD was moderate [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.68–0.89)]. The addition of syndecan-1 improved the discrimination capacity of a clinical model from 0.67 to 0.82 (P < .001) and improved risk prediction, as measured by net reclassification improvement. CONCLUSION: Syndecan-1 is associated with hemodynamic instability during IHD in critically ill patients. It may be useful to identify patients who are at increased risk for such events and suggests that endothelial glycocalyx derangement is involved in the pathophysiology of IHD-related hemodynamic instability. |
---|