Cargando…
Prior Spontaneous or Induced Abortion Is a Risk Factor for Cervical Dysfunction in Pregnant Women: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
A history of abortion is associated with cervical dysfunction during pregnancy, but there remains uncertainty about whether risk can be stratified by the abortion type, the abortion procedure, or number of previous abortions. The objective of this study was to verify the relationship between cervica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10310603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36781584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-023-01170-7 |
_version_ | 1785066575821275136 |
---|---|
author | Brittain, Julia J. Wahl, Stacey E. Strauss, Jerome F. Romero, Roberto Wolf, Hope M. Murphy, Katherine Cyrus, John W. York, Timothy P. |
author_facet | Brittain, Julia J. Wahl, Stacey E. Strauss, Jerome F. Romero, Roberto Wolf, Hope M. Murphy, Katherine Cyrus, John W. York, Timothy P. |
author_sort | Brittain, Julia J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A history of abortion is associated with cervical dysfunction during pregnancy, but there remains uncertainty about whether risk can be stratified by the abortion type, the abortion procedure, or number of previous abortions. The objective of this study was to verify the relationship between cervical dysfunction measures in pregnancies with and without a history of termination. Embase and Medline databases were searched from 01 January 1960 to 01 March 2022 resulting in a full-text review of 28 studies. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality and risk of bias for non-randomized studies. The meta-analysis consisted of 6 studies that met all inclusion and exclusion criteria and included a combined total of 2,513,044 pregnancies. Cervical dysfunction was defined as either cervical insufficiency/incompetence in 4 of the studies and as short cervix in the others. Results from a random-effects model using reported adjusted odds ratios (aOR) estimated an increase in the odds of 2.71 (95% CI 1.76, 4.16) for cervical dysfunction in the current pregnancy related to a history of induced or spontaneous abortion. Subgroup analyses with only induced abortions (surgical/medical) estimated an aOR of 2.54 (95% CI 1.41, 4.57), while studies limited to surgical abortions had an aOR of 4.08 (95% CI 2.84, 5.86). The risk of cervical dysfunction in the current pregnancy was also found to be dependent on the number of previous abortions. In this meta-analysis, a prior history of abortion, and specifically induced abortions, was associated with cervical dysfunction. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020209723). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10310603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103106032023-07-01 Prior Spontaneous or Induced Abortion Is a Risk Factor for Cervical Dysfunction in Pregnant Women: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Brittain, Julia J. Wahl, Stacey E. Strauss, Jerome F. Romero, Roberto Wolf, Hope M. Murphy, Katherine Cyrus, John W. York, Timothy P. Reprod Sci Review A history of abortion is associated with cervical dysfunction during pregnancy, but there remains uncertainty about whether risk can be stratified by the abortion type, the abortion procedure, or number of previous abortions. The objective of this study was to verify the relationship between cervical dysfunction measures in pregnancies with and without a history of termination. Embase and Medline databases were searched from 01 January 1960 to 01 March 2022 resulting in a full-text review of 28 studies. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality and risk of bias for non-randomized studies. The meta-analysis consisted of 6 studies that met all inclusion and exclusion criteria and included a combined total of 2,513,044 pregnancies. Cervical dysfunction was defined as either cervical insufficiency/incompetence in 4 of the studies and as short cervix in the others. Results from a random-effects model using reported adjusted odds ratios (aOR) estimated an increase in the odds of 2.71 (95% CI 1.76, 4.16) for cervical dysfunction in the current pregnancy related to a history of induced or spontaneous abortion. Subgroup analyses with only induced abortions (surgical/medical) estimated an aOR of 2.54 (95% CI 1.41, 4.57), while studies limited to surgical abortions had an aOR of 4.08 (95% CI 2.84, 5.86). The risk of cervical dysfunction in the current pregnancy was also found to be dependent on the number of previous abortions. In this meta-analysis, a prior history of abortion, and specifically induced abortions, was associated with cervical dysfunction. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020209723). Springer International Publishing 2023-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10310603/ /pubmed/36781584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-023-01170-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Brittain, Julia J. Wahl, Stacey E. Strauss, Jerome F. Romero, Roberto Wolf, Hope M. Murphy, Katherine Cyrus, John W. York, Timothy P. Prior Spontaneous or Induced Abortion Is a Risk Factor for Cervical Dysfunction in Pregnant Women: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Prior Spontaneous or Induced Abortion Is a Risk Factor for Cervical Dysfunction in Pregnant Women: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Prior Spontaneous or Induced Abortion Is a Risk Factor for Cervical Dysfunction in Pregnant Women: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Prior Spontaneous or Induced Abortion Is a Risk Factor for Cervical Dysfunction in Pregnant Women: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prior Spontaneous or Induced Abortion Is a Risk Factor for Cervical Dysfunction in Pregnant Women: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Prior Spontaneous or Induced Abortion Is a Risk Factor for Cervical Dysfunction in Pregnant Women: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | prior spontaneous or induced abortion is a risk factor for cervical dysfunction in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10310603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36781584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43032-023-01170-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brittainjuliaj priorspontaneousorinducedabortionisariskfactorforcervicaldysfunctioninpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wahlstaceye priorspontaneousorinducedabortionisariskfactorforcervicaldysfunctioninpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT straussjeromef priorspontaneousorinducedabortionisariskfactorforcervicaldysfunctioninpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT romeroroberto priorspontaneousorinducedabortionisariskfactorforcervicaldysfunctioninpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wolfhopem priorspontaneousorinducedabortionisariskfactorforcervicaldysfunctioninpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT murphykatherine priorspontaneousorinducedabortionisariskfactorforcervicaldysfunctioninpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cyrusjohnw priorspontaneousorinducedabortionisariskfactorforcervicaldysfunctioninpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yorktimothyp priorspontaneousorinducedabortionisariskfactorforcervicaldysfunctioninpregnantwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |