Cargando…

Response Shift After Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Targeting Severe Fatigue: Explorative Analysis of Three Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an evidence-based intervention for severe fatigue. Changes in patients’ fatigue scores following CBT might reflect not only the intended relief in fatigue but also response shift, a change in the meaning of patients’ self-evaluation. Objectives were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Fabiola, Verdam, Mathilde G. E., Oort, Frans J., Riper, Heleen, van Straten, Annemieke, Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M., Sprangers, Mirjam A. G., Knoop, Hans
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10310616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35869349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-022-10111-8
_version_ 1785066578497241088
author Müller, Fabiola
Verdam, Mathilde G. E.
Oort, Frans J.
Riper, Heleen
van Straten, Annemieke
Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.
Knoop, Hans
author_facet Müller, Fabiola
Verdam, Mathilde G. E.
Oort, Frans J.
Riper, Heleen
van Straten, Annemieke
Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.
Knoop, Hans
author_sort Müller, Fabiola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an evidence-based intervention for severe fatigue. Changes in patients’ fatigue scores following CBT might reflect not only the intended relief in fatigue but also response shift, a change in the meaning of patients’ self-evaluation. Objectives were to (1) identify the occurrence of response shift in patients undergoing CBT, (2) determine the impact of response shift on the intervention effect, and (3) investigate whether changes in fatigue-related cognitions and perceptions, targeted during CBT, are associated with response shift. METHODS: Data of three randomized controlled trials testing the efficacy of CBT in individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS, n = 222), cancer (n = 123), and diabetes (n = 107) were re-analyzed. Fatigue severity was measured with 8 items from the Checklist Individual Strength, a valid and widely used self-report questionnaire. Structural equation modelling was applied to assess lack of longitudinal measurement invariance, as indication of response shift. RESULTS: As expected, in all three trials, response shift was indicated in the CBT groups, not the control groups. Response shift through reprioritization was indicated for the items “Physically, I feel exhausted” (CFS) and “I tire easily” (cancer, diabetes), which became less vs. more important to the measurement of fatigue, respectively. However, this did not affect the intervention effects. Some changes in cognitions and perceptions were associated with the response shifts. CONCLUSIONS: CBT seems to induce response shift through reprioritization across patient groups, but its occurrence does not affect the intervention effect. Future research should corroborate these findings and investigate whether patients indeed change their understanding of fatigue. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12529-022-10111-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10310616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103106162023-07-01 Response Shift After Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Targeting Severe Fatigue: Explorative Analysis of Three Randomized Controlled Trials Müller, Fabiola Verdam, Mathilde G. E. Oort, Frans J. Riper, Heleen van Straten, Annemieke Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M. Sprangers, Mirjam A. G. Knoop, Hans Int J Behav Med Full Length Manuscript BACKGROUND: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an evidence-based intervention for severe fatigue. Changes in patients’ fatigue scores following CBT might reflect not only the intended relief in fatigue but also response shift, a change in the meaning of patients’ self-evaluation. Objectives were to (1) identify the occurrence of response shift in patients undergoing CBT, (2) determine the impact of response shift on the intervention effect, and (3) investigate whether changes in fatigue-related cognitions and perceptions, targeted during CBT, are associated with response shift. METHODS: Data of three randomized controlled trials testing the efficacy of CBT in individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS, n = 222), cancer (n = 123), and diabetes (n = 107) were re-analyzed. Fatigue severity was measured with 8 items from the Checklist Individual Strength, a valid and widely used self-report questionnaire. Structural equation modelling was applied to assess lack of longitudinal measurement invariance, as indication of response shift. RESULTS: As expected, in all three trials, response shift was indicated in the CBT groups, not the control groups. Response shift through reprioritization was indicated for the items “Physically, I feel exhausted” (CFS) and “I tire easily” (cancer, diabetes), which became less vs. more important to the measurement of fatigue, respectively. However, this did not affect the intervention effects. Some changes in cognitions and perceptions were associated with the response shifts. CONCLUSIONS: CBT seems to induce response shift through reprioritization across patient groups, but its occurrence does not affect the intervention effect. Future research should corroborate these findings and investigate whether patients indeed change their understanding of fatigue. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12529-022-10111-8. Springer US 2022-07-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10310616/ /pubmed/35869349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-022-10111-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Full Length Manuscript
Müller, Fabiola
Verdam, Mathilde G. E.
Oort, Frans J.
Riper, Heleen
van Straten, Annemieke
Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.
Knoop, Hans
Response Shift After Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Targeting Severe Fatigue: Explorative Analysis of Three Randomized Controlled Trials
title Response Shift After Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Targeting Severe Fatigue: Explorative Analysis of Three Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Response Shift After Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Targeting Severe Fatigue: Explorative Analysis of Three Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Response Shift After Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Targeting Severe Fatigue: Explorative Analysis of Three Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Response Shift After Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Targeting Severe Fatigue: Explorative Analysis of Three Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Response Shift After Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Targeting Severe Fatigue: Explorative Analysis of Three Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort response shift after cognitive behavioral therapy targeting severe fatigue: explorative analysis of three randomized controlled trials
topic Full Length Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10310616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35869349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-022-10111-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mullerfabiola responseshiftaftercognitivebehavioraltherapytargetingseverefatigueexplorativeanalysisofthreerandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT verdammathildege responseshiftaftercognitivebehavioraltherapytargetingseverefatigueexplorativeanalysisofthreerandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT oortfransj responseshiftaftercognitivebehavioraltherapytargetingseverefatigueexplorativeanalysisofthreerandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT riperheleen responseshiftaftercognitivebehavioraltherapytargetingseverefatigueexplorativeanalysisofthreerandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT vanstratenannemieke responseshiftaftercognitivebehavioraltherapytargetingseverefatigueexplorativeanalysisofthreerandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT verdonckdeleeuwirmam responseshiftaftercognitivebehavioraltherapytargetingseverefatigueexplorativeanalysisofthreerandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sprangersmirjamag responseshiftaftercognitivebehavioraltherapytargetingseverefatigueexplorativeanalysisofthreerandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT knoophans responseshiftaftercognitivebehavioraltherapytargetingseverefatigueexplorativeanalysisofthreerandomizedcontrolledtrials