Cargando…

Mate genetic similarity affects mating behaviour but not maternal investment in mice

Maternal investment can affect the survival and development of offspring. Here we experimentally investigated in mice, whether females alter implantation rates and pup survival after embryo transfer depending on the genetic similarity with their vasectomised mating partner. We selected the MHC genot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Auer, Kerstin E., Primus, Jasmin, Istel, Sonja, Dahlhoff, Maik, Rülicke, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10310752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37547-6
_version_ 1785066600820375552
author Auer, Kerstin E.
Primus, Jasmin
Istel, Sonja
Dahlhoff, Maik
Rülicke, Thomas
author_facet Auer, Kerstin E.
Primus, Jasmin
Istel, Sonja
Dahlhoff, Maik
Rülicke, Thomas
author_sort Auer, Kerstin E.
collection PubMed
description Maternal investment can affect the survival and development of offspring. Here we experimentally investigated in mice, whether females alter implantation rates and pup survival after embryo transfer depending on the genetic similarity with their vasectomised mating partner. We selected the MHC genotype and genetic background of males and paired females either with males that shared the same MHC haplotype and genetic background (CBA/J inbred males, isogenic group), that shared half of the MHC haplotype and genetic background (B6CBAF1 hybrid males, semi-isogenic group), or that had a different MHC haplotype and genetic background (C57BL/6N inbred males, allogenic group). We performed 304 pairings, resulting in 81 vaginal plugs, which confirmed mating. Plug rates were significantly higher in the semi-isogenic group (36.9%) compared to the isogenic group (19.5%), but not the allogenic group (26%). We found no difference in the number of implantation sites, the number of born or surviving pups until weaning, or litter weight or sex ratio between groups. Even though we found a mating bias, we found no difference in maternal investment under laboratory conditions. At least under pathogen-free conditions our study does not provide any evidence for differential maternal investment when females could increase offspring genetic diversity or heterozygosity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10310752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103107522023-07-01 Mate genetic similarity affects mating behaviour but not maternal investment in mice Auer, Kerstin E. Primus, Jasmin Istel, Sonja Dahlhoff, Maik Rülicke, Thomas Sci Rep Article Maternal investment can affect the survival and development of offspring. Here we experimentally investigated in mice, whether females alter implantation rates and pup survival after embryo transfer depending on the genetic similarity with their vasectomised mating partner. We selected the MHC genotype and genetic background of males and paired females either with males that shared the same MHC haplotype and genetic background (CBA/J inbred males, isogenic group), that shared half of the MHC haplotype and genetic background (B6CBAF1 hybrid males, semi-isogenic group), or that had a different MHC haplotype and genetic background (C57BL/6N inbred males, allogenic group). We performed 304 pairings, resulting in 81 vaginal plugs, which confirmed mating. Plug rates were significantly higher in the semi-isogenic group (36.9%) compared to the isogenic group (19.5%), but not the allogenic group (26%). We found no difference in the number of implantation sites, the number of born or surviving pups until weaning, or litter weight or sex ratio between groups. Even though we found a mating bias, we found no difference in maternal investment under laboratory conditions. At least under pathogen-free conditions our study does not provide any evidence for differential maternal investment when females could increase offspring genetic diversity or heterozygosity. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10310752/ /pubmed/37386286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37547-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Auer, Kerstin E.
Primus, Jasmin
Istel, Sonja
Dahlhoff, Maik
Rülicke, Thomas
Mate genetic similarity affects mating behaviour but not maternal investment in mice
title Mate genetic similarity affects mating behaviour but not maternal investment in mice
title_full Mate genetic similarity affects mating behaviour but not maternal investment in mice
title_fullStr Mate genetic similarity affects mating behaviour but not maternal investment in mice
title_full_unstemmed Mate genetic similarity affects mating behaviour but not maternal investment in mice
title_short Mate genetic similarity affects mating behaviour but not maternal investment in mice
title_sort mate genetic similarity affects mating behaviour but not maternal investment in mice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10310752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37547-6
work_keys_str_mv AT auerkerstine mategeneticsimilarityaffectsmatingbehaviourbutnotmaternalinvestmentinmice
AT primusjasmin mategeneticsimilarityaffectsmatingbehaviourbutnotmaternalinvestmentinmice
AT istelsonja mategeneticsimilarityaffectsmatingbehaviourbutnotmaternalinvestmentinmice
AT dahlhoffmaik mategeneticsimilarityaffectsmatingbehaviourbutnotmaternalinvestmentinmice
AT rulickethomas mategeneticsimilarityaffectsmatingbehaviourbutnotmaternalinvestmentinmice