Cargando…
Assessing the impact of protonating acid combinations in e-cigarette liquids: a randomised, crossover study on nicotine pharmacokinetics
The addition of protonating acids to e-cigarette liquid formulations (e-liquids) enhances nicotine bioavailability in e-cigarette use. However, little is known about the impact of different combinations of protonating acid on nicotine pharmacokinetics. The objectives of this study were to compare ph...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10310785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37539-6 |
_version_ | 1785066607363489792 |
---|---|
author | Frosina, Justin McEwan, Michael Ebajemito, James Thissen, Jesse Taluskie, Karen Baxter-Wright, Sarah Hardie, George |
author_facet | Frosina, Justin McEwan, Michael Ebajemito, James Thissen, Jesse Taluskie, Karen Baxter-Wright, Sarah Hardie, George |
author_sort | Frosina, Justin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The addition of protonating acids to e-cigarette liquid formulations (e-liquids) enhances nicotine bioavailability in e-cigarette use. However, little is known about the impact of different combinations of protonating acid on nicotine pharmacokinetics. The objectives of this study were to compare pharmacokinetics of nicotine absorption following use of a closed-system e-cigarette, containing e-liquids with two different nicotine levels and with different ratios of three common protonating acids—lactic, benzoic and levulinic. In a randomised, controlled, crossover study, nicotine pharmacokinetics and product liking were assessed for prototype e-liquids used in a Vuse e-cigarette containing either 3.5% or 5% nicotine and varying ratios of lactic, benzoic and/or levulinic acid. During an 8-day confinement period, 32 healthy adult current cigarette smokers/e-cigarette dual users used a single study e-liquid each day during 10-min fixed and ad libitum use periods after overnight nicotine abstinence. For most comparisons, C(max) and AUC(0–60) following both fixed and ad libitum puffing were significantly higher for e-liquids containing 5% nicotine compared with 3.5% nicotine. However, C(max) and AUC(0–60) were not statistically different for 5% nicotine e-liquids containing varying ratios of lactic, levulinic and benzoic acid when compared to an e-liquid containing lactic acid only. Mean scores for product liking were similar for all e-liquid formulations assessed, regardless of nicotine concentration, acid content, and whether the product was used in a fixed or ad libitum puffing regimen. While e-liquid nicotine concentration significantly affected users’ nicotine uptake, the different combinations of benzoic, levulinic and lactic acid in the e-liquids assessed had limited impact on nicotine pharmacokinetics and product liking scores. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10310785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103107852023-07-01 Assessing the impact of protonating acid combinations in e-cigarette liquids: a randomised, crossover study on nicotine pharmacokinetics Frosina, Justin McEwan, Michael Ebajemito, James Thissen, Jesse Taluskie, Karen Baxter-Wright, Sarah Hardie, George Sci Rep Article The addition of protonating acids to e-cigarette liquid formulations (e-liquids) enhances nicotine bioavailability in e-cigarette use. However, little is known about the impact of different combinations of protonating acid on nicotine pharmacokinetics. The objectives of this study were to compare pharmacokinetics of nicotine absorption following use of a closed-system e-cigarette, containing e-liquids with two different nicotine levels and with different ratios of three common protonating acids—lactic, benzoic and levulinic. In a randomised, controlled, crossover study, nicotine pharmacokinetics and product liking were assessed for prototype e-liquids used in a Vuse e-cigarette containing either 3.5% or 5% nicotine and varying ratios of lactic, benzoic and/or levulinic acid. During an 8-day confinement period, 32 healthy adult current cigarette smokers/e-cigarette dual users used a single study e-liquid each day during 10-min fixed and ad libitum use periods after overnight nicotine abstinence. For most comparisons, C(max) and AUC(0–60) following both fixed and ad libitum puffing were significantly higher for e-liquids containing 5% nicotine compared with 3.5% nicotine. However, C(max) and AUC(0–60) were not statistically different for 5% nicotine e-liquids containing varying ratios of lactic, levulinic and benzoic acid when compared to an e-liquid containing lactic acid only. Mean scores for product liking were similar for all e-liquid formulations assessed, regardless of nicotine concentration, acid content, and whether the product was used in a fixed or ad libitum puffing regimen. While e-liquid nicotine concentration significantly affected users’ nicotine uptake, the different combinations of benzoic, levulinic and lactic acid in the e-liquids assessed had limited impact on nicotine pharmacokinetics and product liking scores. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10310785/ /pubmed/37386281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37539-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Frosina, Justin McEwan, Michael Ebajemito, James Thissen, Jesse Taluskie, Karen Baxter-Wright, Sarah Hardie, George Assessing the impact of protonating acid combinations in e-cigarette liquids: a randomised, crossover study on nicotine pharmacokinetics |
title | Assessing the impact of protonating acid combinations in e-cigarette liquids: a randomised, crossover study on nicotine pharmacokinetics |
title_full | Assessing the impact of protonating acid combinations in e-cigarette liquids: a randomised, crossover study on nicotine pharmacokinetics |
title_fullStr | Assessing the impact of protonating acid combinations in e-cigarette liquids: a randomised, crossover study on nicotine pharmacokinetics |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the impact of protonating acid combinations in e-cigarette liquids: a randomised, crossover study on nicotine pharmacokinetics |
title_short | Assessing the impact of protonating acid combinations in e-cigarette liquids: a randomised, crossover study on nicotine pharmacokinetics |
title_sort | assessing the impact of protonating acid combinations in e-cigarette liquids: a randomised, crossover study on nicotine pharmacokinetics |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10310785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37539-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frosinajustin assessingtheimpactofprotonatingacidcombinationsinecigaretteliquidsarandomisedcrossoverstudyonnicotinepharmacokinetics AT mcewanmichael assessingtheimpactofprotonatingacidcombinationsinecigaretteliquidsarandomisedcrossoverstudyonnicotinepharmacokinetics AT ebajemitojames assessingtheimpactofprotonatingacidcombinationsinecigaretteliquidsarandomisedcrossoverstudyonnicotinepharmacokinetics AT thissenjesse assessingtheimpactofprotonatingacidcombinationsinecigaretteliquidsarandomisedcrossoverstudyonnicotinepharmacokinetics AT taluskiekaren assessingtheimpactofprotonatingacidcombinationsinecigaretteliquidsarandomisedcrossoverstudyonnicotinepharmacokinetics AT baxterwrightsarah assessingtheimpactofprotonatingacidcombinationsinecigaretteliquidsarandomisedcrossoverstudyonnicotinepharmacokinetics AT hardiegeorge assessingtheimpactofprotonatingacidcombinationsinecigaretteliquidsarandomisedcrossoverstudyonnicotinepharmacokinetics |