Cargando…
GAN-based data augmentation for transcriptomics: survey and comparative assessment
MOTIVATION: Transcriptomics data are becoming more accessible due to high-throughput and less costly sequencing methods. However, data scarcity prevents exploiting deep learning models’ full predictive power for phenotypes prediction. Artificially enhancing the training sets, namely data augmentatio...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37387181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad239 |
_version_ | 1785066721488404480 |
---|---|
author | Lacan, Alice Sebag, Michèle Hanczar, Blaise |
author_facet | Lacan, Alice Sebag, Michèle Hanczar, Blaise |
author_sort | Lacan, Alice |
collection | PubMed |
description | MOTIVATION: Transcriptomics data are becoming more accessible due to high-throughput and less costly sequencing methods. However, data scarcity prevents exploiting deep learning models’ full predictive power for phenotypes prediction. Artificially enhancing the training sets, namely data augmentation, is suggested as a regularization strategy. Data augmentation corresponds to label-invariant transformations of the training set (e.g. geometric transformations on images and syntax parsing on text data). Such transformations are, unfortunately, unknown in the transcriptomic field. Therefore, deep generative models such as generative adversarial networks (GANs) have been proposed to generate additional samples. In this article, we analyze GAN-based data augmentation strategies with respect to performance indicators and the classification of cancer phenotypes. RESULTS: This work highlights a significant boost in binary and multiclass classification performances due to augmentation strategies. Without augmentation, training a classifier on only 50 RNA-seq samples yields an accuracy of, respectively, 94% and 70% for binary and tissue classification. In comparison, we achieved 98% and 94% of accuracy when adding 1000 augmented samples. Richer architectures and more expensive training of the GAN return better augmentation performances and generated data quality overall. Further analysis of the generated data shows that several performance indicators are needed to assess its quality correctly. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All data used for this research are publicly available and comes from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Reproducible code is available on the GitLab repository: https://forge.ibisc.univ-evry.fr/alacan/GANs-for-transcriptomics |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10311334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103113342023-07-01 GAN-based data augmentation for transcriptomics: survey and comparative assessment Lacan, Alice Sebag, Michèle Hanczar, Blaise Bioinformatics Biomedical Informatics MOTIVATION: Transcriptomics data are becoming more accessible due to high-throughput and less costly sequencing methods. However, data scarcity prevents exploiting deep learning models’ full predictive power for phenotypes prediction. Artificially enhancing the training sets, namely data augmentation, is suggested as a regularization strategy. Data augmentation corresponds to label-invariant transformations of the training set (e.g. geometric transformations on images and syntax parsing on text data). Such transformations are, unfortunately, unknown in the transcriptomic field. Therefore, deep generative models such as generative adversarial networks (GANs) have been proposed to generate additional samples. In this article, we analyze GAN-based data augmentation strategies with respect to performance indicators and the classification of cancer phenotypes. RESULTS: This work highlights a significant boost in binary and multiclass classification performances due to augmentation strategies. Without augmentation, training a classifier on only 50 RNA-seq samples yields an accuracy of, respectively, 94% and 70% for binary and tissue classification. In comparison, we achieved 98% and 94% of accuracy when adding 1000 augmented samples. Richer architectures and more expensive training of the GAN return better augmentation performances and generated data quality overall. Further analysis of the generated data shows that several performance indicators are needed to assess its quality correctly. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All data used for this research are publicly available and comes from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Reproducible code is available on the GitLab repository: https://forge.ibisc.univ-evry.fr/alacan/GANs-for-transcriptomics Oxford University Press 2023-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10311334/ /pubmed/37387181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad239 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Biomedical Informatics Lacan, Alice Sebag, Michèle Hanczar, Blaise GAN-based data augmentation for transcriptomics: survey and comparative assessment |
title | GAN-based data augmentation for transcriptomics: survey and comparative assessment |
title_full | GAN-based data augmentation for transcriptomics: survey and comparative assessment |
title_fullStr | GAN-based data augmentation for transcriptomics: survey and comparative assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | GAN-based data augmentation for transcriptomics: survey and comparative assessment |
title_short | GAN-based data augmentation for transcriptomics: survey and comparative assessment |
title_sort | gan-based data augmentation for transcriptomics: survey and comparative assessment |
topic | Biomedical Informatics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37387181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btad239 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lacanalice ganbaseddataaugmentationfortranscriptomicssurveyandcomparativeassessment AT sebagmichele ganbaseddataaugmentationfortranscriptomicssurveyandcomparativeassessment AT hanczarblaise ganbaseddataaugmentationfortranscriptomicssurveyandcomparativeassessment |